Advertisement

Planning a campaign to fight stroke: an educational pilot project in La Spezia, Italy

  • Elisa GiorliEmail author
  • E. Schirinzi
  • R. Baldi
  • A. Mannironi
  • E. Raggio
  • N. Reale
  • C. Gandolfo
  • M. Del Sette
Original Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Best medical treatments of ischemic stroke are admission to stroke unit, intravenous thrombolysis and, in selected cases, thrombectomy. Time from symptom onset to interventions is the best predictor of clinical outcome. In order to verify the effectiveness of an active education programme of awareness on the knowledge of stroke, we performed a local campaign “on the field”.

Subjects and methods

We selected 101 subjects from the general population who took part in the “stroke awareness campaign” organised by the Italian Association for the fight against stroke (A.L.I.Ce). Mean age was 59 years (50% female; 50% male); 55% of the sample reported a high level of education (> 8 years: high school or university degree). After a short multiple-choice questionnaire, we administered a face-to-face standard educational protocol (15 min). The efficacy of that educational intervention was then verified after a period of 12 months, by telephone interview.

Results

There was improvement both in the definition of stroke (66% vs. 92%, p < .001) and in recognizing symptoms and signs (19% vs. 72%, p < .001). Knowledge of the importance of stroke unit in the acute treatment of stroke did not improve, as it was already high on baseline (92% vs. 97%, p: n.s.). The improvement was evident in particular in younger and higher educated people, without difference in gender. There was no difference based on risk factor profiles of participants.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that a personalised education can improve knowledge on stroke symptoms and signs, independently of gender and personal risk factors. The results should be verified in larger and less selection population.

Keywords

Awareness Stroke Information campaign Educational project 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Financial disclosure

No author has a financial relationship with the company who manufactures any product or equipment discussed in this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Berkhemer A, Fransen PSS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJH, van Walderveen MAA, Staals J, Hofmeijer J, van Oostayen JA, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, Boiten J, Brouwer PA, Emmer BJ, de Bruijn SF, van Dijk LC, Kappelle LJ, Lo RH, van Dijk EJ, de Vries J, de Kort PLM, van Rooij WJJ, van den Berg JSP, van Hasselt BAAM, Aerden LAM, Dallinga RJ, Visser MC, Bot JCJ, Vroomen PC, Eshghi O, Schreuder THCML, Heijboer RJJ, Keizer K, Tielbeek AV, den Hertog HM, Gerrits DG, van den Berg-Vos RM, Karas GB, Steyerberg EW, Flach HZ, Marquering HA, Sprengers MES, Jenniskens SFM, Beenen LFM, van den Berg R, Koudstaal PJ, van Zwam WH, Roos YBWEM, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Majoie CBLM, Dippel DWJ, for the MR CLEAN Investigators* (2015) A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372(1):11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee; ESO Writing Committee (2008) Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 25(5):457–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eissa A et al (2012) Barriers to the utilization of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. J Clin Pharm Ther 37:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    California Acute Stroke Pilot Registry (CASPR) study group (2005) Prioritizing interventions to improve rates of thrombolysis for ischemic stroke. Neurology 64:654–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sozener CB, Barsan WG (2012) Impact of regional pre-hospital emergency medical services in treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1268:51–56.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evenson KR et al (2001) Pre-hospital and in-hospital delays in acute stroke care. Neuroepidemiology 20:65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jorgensen HS et al (1996) Factors delaying hospital admission in acute stroke: the Copenhagen stroke study. Neurology 47:383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bray JE, Finn J, Cameron P, Smith K, Straney L, Cartledge S, Nehme Z, Lim M, Bladin C (2018) Temporal trends in emergency medical services and general practitioner use for acute stroke after Australian public education campaigns. Stroke. 49(12):3078–3080.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caminiti C, Schulz P, Marcomini B, Iezzi E, Riva S, Scoditti U, Zini A, Malferrari G, Zedde ML, Guidetti D, Montanari E, Baratti M, Denti L, Educazione e Ritardo di Ospedalizzazione (E.R.O.I) study group (2017) Development of an education campaign to reduce delays in pre-hospital response to stroke. BMC Emerg Med. 2017 Jun 24; 17(1): 20  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-017-0130-9
  10. 10.
    Denti L, Caminiti C, Scoditti U, Zini A, Malferrari G, Zedde ML, Guidetti D, Baratti M, Vaghi L, Montanari E, Marcomini B, Riva S, Iezzi E, Castellini P, Olivato S, Barbi F, Perticaroli E, Monaco D, Iafelice I, Bigliardi G, Vandelli L, Guareschi A, Artoni A, Zanferrari C, Schulz PJ (2017) Impact on prehospital delay of a stroke preparedness campaign: a SW-RCT (stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial). Stroke. 48(12):3316–3322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Góngora-Rivera F, González-Aquines A, Muruet W, Barrera-Barrera S, Leal-Bailey H, Espinosa-Ortega MA, Patrón-de Treviño A, Jacobo-Saucedo LA, Villarreal-Velazquez HJ, Garcia-Ortiz W, Saucedo-Ostos YY, Cordero-Perez AC, Chavez-Luevanos BE, on behalf of Secretaria de Salud del Estado de Nuevo León and GECEN Investigators (2018) Difference in stroke knowledge between rural and urban communities in a developing country after community-based stroke educational campaigns: results from a cross-sectional study. Neuroepidemiology. 51(3–4):224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rasura M, Baldereschi M, Di Carlo A, Di Lisi F, Patella R, Piccardi B, Polizzi B, Inzitari D. Effectiveness of public stroke educational interventions: a review. Eur J Neurol 2013Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alberts MJ, Wechsler LR, Jensen ME, Latchaw RE, Crocco TJ, George MG, Baranski J, Bass RR, Ruff RL, Huang J, Mancini B, Gregory T, Gress D, Emr M, Warren M, Walker MD (2013) Formation and function of acute stroke-ready hospitals within a stroke system of care recommendations from the brain attack coalition. Stroke. 44(12):3382–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kothari RU, Pancioli A, Liu T, Brott T, Broderick J (1999) Cincinnati pre- hospital stroke scale: reproducibility and validity. Ann Emerg Med 33:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kleindorfer DO, Broderick JP, Khoury J, Flaherty ML, Woo D, Alwell K, Moomaw CJ, Pancioli A, Jauch E, Miller R, Kissela BM (2007) Emergency department arrival times after acute ischemic stroke during the 1990s. Neurocrit Care 7(1):31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Warning signs of stroke. Available at: https://www.strokeassociation.org. Accessed Jan 2014
  17. 17.
    Traverso E, Landini E, Gandolfo C, Reale N, Ferrari A, Del Sette M (2011) Stroke awareness: results of a survey in La Spezia. Neurol. Sci 32(Suppl):S440Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haesebaert J, Nighoghossian N, Mercier C, Termoz A, Porthault S, Derex L, Gueugniaud PY, Bravant E, Rabilloud M, Schott AM (2018) AVC II Trial group. Improving access to thrombolysis and inhospital management times in ischemic stroke: a stepped-wedge randomized trial. Stroke 49(2):405–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Williams O, Hecht MF, DeSorbo AL, Huq S, Noble JM (2014) Effect of a novel video game on stroke knowledge of 9- to 10-year-old, low-income children. Stroke 45(3):889–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lecouturier J, Rodgers H, Murtagh MJ, White M, Ford GA, Thomson RG (2010) Systematic review of mass media interventions designed to improve public recognition of stroke symptoms, emergency response and early treatment. BMC Public Health 10:784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clouston SAP, Manganello JA, Richards M (2017) A life course approach to health literacy: the role of gender, educational attainment and lifetime cognitive capability. Age Ageing 46(3):493–499Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mellon L, Doyle F, Rohde D, Williams D, Hickey A (2015) Stroke warning campaigns: delivering better patient outcomes? A systematic review. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015 Feb 25;6:61–73.  https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S54087.eCollection2015
  23. 23.
    Nishijima H, Kon T, Ueno T, Haga R, Yamazaki K, Yagihashi K, Funamizu Y, Arai A, Suzuki C, Nunomura J, Baba M, Tomiyama M (2016) Effect of educational television commercial on pre-hospital delay in patients with ischemic stroke. Neurol Sci 37(1):105–109.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2372-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baldereschi M, Di Carlo A, Vaccaro C, Polizzi B, Inzitari D (2015) Promotion Implementation of Stroke Care in Italy Project Working Group. Stroke knowledge in Italy. Neurol Sci 36(3):415–421.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1964-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M Baldereschi et al. The Italian stroke-app: ICTUS3R. Neurol Sci 2016Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit of NeurologySt. Andrea HospitalLa SpeziaItaly
  2. 2.A.L.I.Ce. LiguriaAssociazione Lotta all’Ictus CerebraleGenoaItaly
  3. 3.Unit of NeurologyE.O. Ospedali GallieraGenoaItaly
  4. 4.S.S.D. EpidemiologySt. Andrea HospitalLa SpeziaItaly
  5. 5.Department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and GeneticsUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations