Advertisement

Reply to: “Diagnostic test accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in the detection of post-stroke cognitive impairment under different stages and cutoffs: a systematic review and meta-analysis”

  • Elise MilosevichEmail author
  • Sarah Pendlebury
  • Nele Demeyere
Letter to the Editor
  • 39 Downloads

Dear Editor-in-Chief,

We read the review by Shi et al. [1] with interest and agree that early detection of post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is very important, both for clinicians and patients since accurate detection of cognitive deficits post-stroke can facilitate appropriate rehabilitation and discharge planning. The authors aimed to systematically review the literature to identify and quantify studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [2] in stroke survivors, assess the sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA, provide optimal cutoffs, and compare the MoCA with other available screening tools. These aims together with the suggestion at the start of the discussion that “a brief and sensitive screening tool is urgently needed,” prompted us to highlight a significant oversight. The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS) [3] was specifically developed as a brief cognitive screen for use post-stroke and although the OCS was used in the study by...

Keywords

Cognitive Stroke Post-stroke cognitive impairment Cognitive assessment Neuropsychology OCS MoCA MMSE 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

This “Letter to the Editor” has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration and the authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Shi D, Chen X, Li Z (2018) Diagnostic test accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in the detection of post-stroke cognitive impairment under different stages and cutoffs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 39:705–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V et al (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:695–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Demeyere N, Riddoch MJ, Slavkova ED, Bickerton WL, Humphreys GW (2015) The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS): validation of a stroke-specific short cognitive screening tool. Psychol Assess 27(3):883–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mancuso M, Demeyere N, Abbruzzese L et al (2018) Using the Oxford Cognitive Screen to detect cognitive impairment in stroke patients: a comparison with the mini-mental state examination. Front Neurol 9(101):1–9Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Demeyere N, Riddoch MJ, Slavkova ED, Jones K, Reckless I, Mathieson P, Humphreys GW (2016) Domain-specific versus generalized cognitive screening in acute stroke. J Neurol 263:306–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013). Stroke rehabilitation in adults (Nice Guideline CG162). Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg162
  7. 7.
    Rudd AG, Bowen A, Young GR, James MA (2017). National clinical guidelines for stroke: 5th edition. Clinical Medicine (Royal College of Physicians, London). Available at: https://www.strokeaudit.org/Guideline/Full-Guideline.aspx
  8. 8.
    Folsetin MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pendlebury ST, Markwick A, de Jager CA, Zamboni G, Wilcock GK, Rothwell PM (2012) Differences in cognitive profile between TIA, stroke and elderly memory research subjects: a comparison of the MMSE and MoCA. Cerebrovasc Dis 34(1):48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, Arnold R, Hodges JR (2006) The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revisided (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 21:1078–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pendlebury ST, Mariz J, Bull L, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM (2012) MoCA, ACE-R, and MMSE versus the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and stroke-Canadian stroke network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards neuropsychological battery after TIA and stroke. Stroke 43:464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pendlebury ST, Klaus SP, Thomson RJ, Mehta Z, Wharton RM, Rothwell PM, for the Oxford Vascular Study (2015) Methodological factors in determining risk of dementia after transient ischemic attack and stroke: (III) applicability of cognitive tests. Stroke 46:3067–3073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Godefroy O, Yaïche H, Taillia H et al (2018) GRECogVASC study group. Who should undergo a comprehensive cognitive assessment after a stroke? A cognitive risk score. Neurology 91(21):e1979–e1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zietemann V, Georgakis MK, Dondaine T et al. (2018). Early MoCA predicts long-term cognitive and functional outcome and mortality after stroke. Neurology;91(20):e1838-31850Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe HospitalUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations