Advertisement

Vastus lateralis myofascial free flap for tongue reconstruction and hypoglossal-femoral anastomosis: neurophysiological study

  • Edvina Galiè
  • Veronica VillaniEmail author
  • Fabio Ferreli
  • Andrea Pace
  • Raul Pellini
Original Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Total or nearly glossectomy with laryngeal preservation may lead to development of dysfunction speech, chewing, and swallowing with orally disabled. Pellini et al. analyze the feasibility of vastus lateralis myofascial free flap (VLMFF) in tongue reconstruction and demonstrated that this treatment offers a better cosmetic result in tongue reconstruction, an adequate bulk when needed, a mass reduction of neo-tongue after 30 days post-surgery of 20–30%, an optimal functional results, and an obliteration of dead space and with thus preventing fistulas and infections with minimal morbidity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the innervation of tongue reconstruction performed with nerve anastomosis between the unilateral hypoglossal nerve and branch for vastus lateralis muscle of femoral nerve with neurophysiological study.

Results

We performed a neurophysiological evaluation of four patients who underwent surgery and observed a reinnervation of tongue flap by the anastomosis hypoglossal-femoral nerve for the reconstruction of neo-tongue with vastus lateralis myofascial free flap. The reconstruction of neo-tongue with vastus lateralis myofascial free flap may be represent a valid surgery for patients with cancer tongue.

Keywords

Tongue Reconstruction Neurophysiological study Cancer 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

Edvina Galié and Raoul Pellini study concepts and design, draft/revise the manuscript, analyze or interpret the data, accept responsibility for conduct of research and final approval, and acquire the data. Ferreli and Villani acquire the data, revise the manuscript, and accept responsibility for conduct of research and final approval. A Pace analyzes or interprets the data and accepts responsibility for conduct of research and final approval.

Compliance with ethical standards

The local Institutional Review Board approved the study, and each patient provided a valid informed consent before enrollment.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Shah NG, Trivedi TI, Tankshali RA, Goswami JA, Shah JS, Jetly DH, Kobawala TP, Patel KC, Shukla SN, Shah PM, Verma RJ (2007) Molecular alterations in oral carcinogenesis: significant risk predictors in malignant transformation and tumor progression. Int J Biol Markers 22:132–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Engel H, Huang JJ, Lin CY, Lam W, Kao HK, Gazyakan E, Cheng MH (2010) A strategic approach for tongue reconstruction to achieve predictable and improved functional and aesthetic outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1967–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chien CY, Su CY, Hwang CF, Chuang HC, Jeng SF, Chen YC (2006) Ablation of advanced tongue or base of tongue cancer and reconstruction with free flap: functional outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:353–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Connell DA, Reiger J, Dziegielewski PT, Tang JL, Wolfaardt J, Harris JR, Mlynarek A, Seikaly H (2009) Effect of lingual and hypoglossal nerve reconstruction on swallowing function in head and neck surgery: prospective functional outcomes study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 38:246–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyd B, Mulholland S, Gullane P, Irish J, Kelly L, Rotstein L, Brown D (1994) Reinnervated lateral antebrachial cutaneous neurosome flaps in oral reconstruction: are we making sense? Plast Reconstr Surg 93:1350–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pellini R, De Virgilio A, Mercante G, Pichi B, Manciocco V, Marchesi P, Ferreli F, Spriano G (2016) Vastus lateralis myofascial free flap in tongue reconstruction. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 36:321–325PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crary MA, Mann GD, Groher ME (2005 Aug) Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86(8):151615–151620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yun IS, Lee DW, Lee WJ, Lew DH, Choi EC, Rah DK (2010) Correlation of neotongue volume changes with functional outcomes after long-term follow-up of total glossectomy. J Craniofac Surg 21:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pazardzhikliev DD, Shipkov CD, Yovchev IP, Khater RH, Kamishev IS (2012) Functional reconstruction of subtotal glossectomy defects with radial forearm free flap: case report and review of literature. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 54:606–605Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang CH, Chen HC, Huang YL, Mardini S, Feng GM (2004) Comparison of the radial forearm flap and the thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap for reconstruction of tongue defects: an evaluation of donor-site morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1704–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu P (2004) Reinnervated anterolateral thigh flap for tongue reconstruction. Head Neck 26:1038–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Navarro X, Verdú E, Rodríguez F et al (2001) Artificial nerve graft for the repair of peripheral nerve injuries. Neurol Sci 22(Suppl 1):S7–S13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martinez-Dubarbie F, Herrera-Calvo G, Drake-Pérez M, Riancho J (2018) Unilateral isolated hypoglossal neuropathy associated to jugular paraganglioma. Neurol Sci 39:971–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu P, Robb GL (2005) Reconstruction for total and near-total glossectomy defects. Clin Plast Surg 32(3):411–419 vii CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katou F, Shirai N, Kamakura S, Ohki H, Motegi K, Andoh N, Date F, Nagura H (1995) Intraoral reconstruction with innervated forearm flap: a comparison of sensibility and reinnervation in innervated versus noninnervated forearm flap. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:638–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nordgren M, Hammerlid E, Bjordal K, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Boysen M, Jannert M (2008) Quality of life in oral carcinoma: a 5-year prospective study. Head Neck 30:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hanasono MM, Matros E, Disa JJ (2014) Important aspects of head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(6):968e–980eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loewen IJ, Boliek CA, Harris J, Seikaly H, Rieger JM (2010) Oral sensation and function: a comparison of patients with innervated radial forearm free flap reconstruction to healthy matched controls. Head Neck 32:85–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brown FW, Charles FB, Aminoff MJ: Neuromuscular function and disease: basic, clinical and electrodiagnostic aspects. Saunders edition 2002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neuroncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer InstituteRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryIRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer InstituteRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations