Advertisement

Regression-based normative data and equivalent scores for Trail Making Test (TMT): an updated Italian normative study

  • Mattia Siciliano
  • Carlo Chiorri
  • Valeria Battini
  • Valeria Sant’Elia
  • Manuela Altieri
  • Luigi Trojano
  • Gabriella Santangelo
Original Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

The Trail Making Test (TMT) is widely used to assess psychomotor speed and attentional set-shifting. Since the regression-based norms and equivalent scores (ESs) for the TMT Italian version trace back to more than 20 years ago, we aimed at providing updated normative data for basic (Part A and Part B) and derived (Score B-A and Score B/A) TMT scores collected in a larger sample with an extended age range.

Methods

Three hundred fifty-five Italian volunteers stratified for sex (166 men), age decades (age range 20–90 years), and educational level (from primary school to university) completed the TMT and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Results

Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that age and educational level significantly influenced performances on basic and derived TMT scores except for B/A, which was associated only with the educational level. From the derived linear equations, correction grids for basic and derived TMT raw scores were developed. Inferential cutoff scores, estimated using a non-parametric technique, and ES were computed. Basic and derived TMT scores showed a good test–retest reliability (all rs ≥ 0.50); Part B (rs = − 0.48, p < 0.001) and Score B-A (rs = − 0.49, p < 0.001) were moderately associated with MoCA total score.

Conclusions

This study confirms the association of basic and derived TMT raw scores with sociodemographic variables and provides updated correction grids and ES for assessing the attentional/executive functions in clinical and research fields.

Keywords

Trail Making Test Norms Executive functions Attention Dementia Assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Paola Falanga, Dr. Ilaria Fornaro, Dr. Maria Rosaria Figliola, Dr. Domenico Vivarelli, Dr. Anita Sportiello, and UNITRE for their contribution in collecting data.

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10072_2018_3673_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (479 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 479 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    US War Department AGsO (1944) The new Army Individual Test of General Mental Ability. Psychol Bull 41:532–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lezak MD (1995) Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spreen O, Strauss E (1998) A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reitan R, Wolfson D (1993) The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: theory and clinical interpretation. Neuropsychology Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crowe SF (1998) The differential contribution of mental tracking, cognitive flexibility, visual search, and motor speed to performance on parts A and B of the Trail Making Test. J Clin Psychol 54:585–591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sánchez-Cubillo I, Periáñez JA, Adrover-Roig D, Rodríguez-Sánchez JM, Ríos-Lago M, Tirapu J, Barceló F (2009) Construct validity of the Trail Making Test: role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 15:438–450.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709090626 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arbuthnott K, Frank J (2000) Trail making test, part B as a measure of executive control: validation using a set-switching paradigm. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 22:518–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bezdicek O, Motak L, Axelrod BN, Preiss M, Nikolai T, Vyhnalek M, Poreh A, Ruzicka E (2012) Czech version of the Trail Making Test: normative data and clinical utility. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 27:906–914.  https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs084 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moll J, de Oliveira-Souza R, Moll FT, Bramati IE, Andreiuolo PA (2002) The cerebral correlates of set-shifting: an fMRI study of the trail making test. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 60:900–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jacobson SC, Blanchard M, Connolly CC, Cannon M, Garavan H (2011) An fMRI investigation of a novel analogue to the Trail-Making Test. Brain Cogn 77:60–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.06.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Armitage SG (1946) An analysis of certain psychological tests used for the evaluation of brain damage. J Gerontol 60:30–34Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reitan RM (1958) Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 8:271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cangoz B, Karakoc E, Selekler K (2009) Trail Making Test: normative data for Turkish elderly population by age, sex and education. J Neurol Sci 283:73–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2009.02.313 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tombaugh TN (2004) Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 19:203–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hester RL, Kinsella GJ, Ong B, McGregor J (2005) Demographic influences on baseline and derived scores from the trail making test in healthy older Australian adults. Clin Neuropsychol 19:45–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steinberg BA, Bieliauskas LA, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ (2005) Mayo’s older Americans normative studies: age- and IQ-adjusted norms for the Trail-Making Test, the Stroop Test, and MAE Controlled Oral Word Association Test. Clin Neuropsychol 19:329–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bornstein RA (1985) Normative data on selected neuropsychological measures from a nonclinical sample. J Clin Psychol 41:651–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arango-Lasprilla JC, Rivera D, Aguayo A, Rodríguez W, Garza MT, Saracho CP, Rodríguez-Agudelo Y, Aliaga A, Weiler G, Luna M, Longoni M, Ocampo-Barba N, Galarza-Del-Angel J, Panyavin I, Guerra A, Esenarro L, García de la Cadena P, Martínez C, Perrin PB (2015) Trail Making Test: normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population. NeuroRehabilitation 37:639–661.  https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-151284 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ardila A, Moreno S (2001) Neuropsychological test performance in Aruaco Indians: an exploratory study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 7:510–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fernández AL, Marcopulos BA (2008) A comparison of normative data for the Trail Making Test from several countries: equivalence of norms and considerations for interpretation. Scand J Psychol 49:239–246.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679450.2008.00637.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cavaco S, Gonçalves A, Pinto C, Almeida E, Gomes F, Moreira I, Fernandes J, Teixeira-Pinto A (2013) Trail Making Test: regression-based norms for the Portuguese population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 28:189–198.  https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs115 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giovagnoli AR, Del Pesce M, Mascheroni S, Simoncelli M, Laiacona M, Capitani E (1996) Trail making test: normative values from 287 normal adult controls. Ital J Neurol Sci 17:305–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Amodio P, Wenin H, Del Piccolo F, Mapelli D, Montagnese S, Pellegrini A, Musto C, Gatta A, Umiltà C (2002) Variability of trail making test, symbol digit test and line trait test in normal people. A normative study taking into account age-dependent decline and sociobiological variables. Aging Clin Exp Res 14:117–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mondini S, Mapelli D, Vestri A, Bisiacchi P (2003) Esame neuropsicologico breve [Brief neuropsychological exam]. Raffaello Cortina Editore, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amodio P, Campagna F, Olianas S, Iannizzi P, Mapelli D, Penzo M, Angeli P, Gatta A (2008) Detection of minimal hepatic encephalopathy: normalization and optimization of the Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score. A neuropsychological and quantified EEG study. J Hepatol 49:346–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2008.04.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bianchi A, Dai Prà M (2008) Twenty years after Spinnler and Tognoni: new instruments in the Italian neuropsychologist's toolbox. Neurol Sci 29:209–217.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-0970-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Capitani E (1997) Normative data and neuropsychological assessment. common problems in clinical practice and research. Neuropsychol Rehabil 7:295–310.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713755543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brugnolo A, De Carli F, Accardo J, Amore M, Bosia LE, Bruzzaniti C, Cappa SF, Cocito L, Colazzo G, Ferrara M, Ghio L, Magi E, Mancardi GL, Nobili F, Pardini M, Rissotto R, Serrati C, Girtler N (2016) An updated Italian normative dataset for the Stroop color word test (SCWT). Neurol Sci 37:365–372.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2428-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Santangelo G, Siciliano M, Pedone R, Vitale C, Falco F, Bisogno R, Siano P, Barone P, Grossi D, Santangelo F, Trojano L (2015) Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci 36:585–591.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1995-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reitan RM (1955) The relation of the Trail Making Test to organic brain damage. J Consult Psychol 19:393–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wilks SS (1941) Determination of samples size for setting tolerance limits. Ann Math Stat 12:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ackermann H (1985) Mehrdimensionale nicht-parametrische Normbereiche. Methodologische und medizinische. Aspekte. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. [Italian standardization and adjustment of neuropsychological tests]. Ital J Neurol Sci 6:8–20Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cohen JW (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 57:289–300.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2346101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bezdicek O, Stepankova H, Axelrod BN, Nikolai T, Sulc Z, Jech R, Růžička E, Kopecek M (2017) Clinimetric validity of the Trail Making Test Czech version in Parkinson's disease and normative data for older adults. Clin Neuropsychol 31:42–60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1324045 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Knight RG, McMahon J, Green TJ, Skeaff CM (2006) Regression equations for predicting scores of persons over 65 on the rey auditory verbal learning test, the mini-mental state examination, the trail making test and semantic fluency measures. Br J Clin Psychol 45:393–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Corrigan JD, Hinkeldey NS (1987) Relationships between parts A and B of the Trail Making Test. J Clin Psychol 43:402–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lamberty GJP, Chatel SH, Bieliauskas DM, Linas A (1994) Derived Trail Making Test indices: a preliminary report. Neuropsy Neuropsy Behav 7:230–234Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O (2006) A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F, Zonato F, Venneri A (2002) Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci 22:443–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pigliautile M, Chiesi F, Rossetti S, Conestabile Della Staffa M, Ricci M, Federici S, Chiloiro D, Primi C, Mecocci P (2015) Normative data for the ACE-R in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci 36:2185–2190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Catricalà E, Gobbi E, Battista P, Miozzo A, Polito C, Boschi V, Esposito V, Cuoco S, Barone P, Sorbi S, Cappa SF, Garrard P (2017) SAND: a screening for aphasia in nurodegeneration. Development and normative data. Neurol Sci 38:1469–1483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Basagni B, Luzzatti C, Navarrete E, Caputo M, Scrocco G, Damora A, Giunchi L, Gemignani P, Caiazzo A, Gambini MG, Avesani R, Mancuso M, Trojano L, De Tanti A (2017) VRT (verbal reasoning test): a new test for assessment of verbal reasoning. Test realization and Italian normative data from a multicentric study. Neurol Sci 38:643–650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Appollonio I, Leone M, Isella V, Piamarta F, Consoli T, Villa ML, Forapani E, Russo A, Nichelli P (2005) The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci 26:108–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mattia Siciliano
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carlo Chiorri
    • 3
  • Valeria Battini
    • 3
  • Valeria Sant’Elia
    • 2
  • Manuela Altieri
    • 2
  • Luigi Trojano
    • 2
    • 4
  • Gabriella Santangelo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences - MRI Research Center SUN-FISMUniversity of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”NaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”CasertaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Educational SciencesUniversity of GenovaGenoaItaly
  4. 4.ICS MaugeriScientific Institute of TeleseTeleseItaly

Personalised recommendations