Advertisement

Neurological Sciences

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 305–310 | Cite as

Prepulse modulation and recovery of trigemino-cervical reflex in normal subjects

  • Meral E. Kızıltan
  • Pınar Bekdik Şirinocak
  • Tuba Akıncı
  • Tuba Cerrahoğlu Şirin
  • Burcu Nuran Arkalı
  • Fatma Candan
  • Ayşegül GündüzEmail author
Original Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

In this study, we analyzed the inhibitory control on the trigemino-cervical reflex (TCR), and whether or not prepulse modulation (PPM) has an effect on TCR. Thus, we studied the PPM of TCR. We hypothesized that TCR would presumably be under the modulatory effect after the prepulse stimulus similar to blink reflex (BR). We also studied the recovery of TCR which was previously shown.

Methods

We included 13 healthy individuals. All subjects underwent recordings of TCR, TCR-PPM, and recovery of TCR. For TCR-PPM, a subthreshold stimulus to second finger 50 or 100 ms before the test stimulus was applied. For recovery of TCR, two stimuli at the infraorbital nerve were applied at 300, 500, and 800 ms interstimulus intervals (ISIs).

Results

There was an inhibition of bilateral late responses of TCR at the ISIs of both 50 ms and 100 ms. There was no change of latencies. Full recovery of TCR did not develop even at the ISI 800 ms.

Discussion

We have provided an evidence for the TCR-PPM in healthy subjects for the first time in this study. The prepulse inhibition is attributed to the functions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus. Our study provides a strong indication that there are connections between pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and trigemino-cervical circuit, which produces TCR.

Keywords

Prepulse modulation (PPM) Trigemino-cervical reflex (TCR) Prepulse inhibition (PPI) Recovery Pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Zeynep Değirmenci, Sibel Kilinc, Vildan Altop, Mecit Sepetcioglu, and Esat Cetinkaya for excellent technical assistance.

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Valls-Sole J, Valldeoriola F, Molinuevo JL, Cossu G, Nobbe F (1999) Prepulse modulation of the startle reaction and the blink reflex in normal human subjects. Exp Brain Res 129:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gómez-Wong E, Valls-Solé J (1996) Effects of a prepulse stimulus on the masseteric inhibitory reflex in humans. Neurosci Lett Apr 208:183–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alvarez-Blanco S, Leon L, Valls-Solé J (2009) The startle reaction to somatosensory inputs: different response pattern to stimuli of upper and lower limbs. Exp Brain Res 195:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown P, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Britton TC, Day BL, Marsden CD (1991) New observations on the normal auditory startle reflex in man. Brain 114:1891–1902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Nardone R, Tartaglione T, Quartarone A, Tonali P, Rothwell JC (1996) Preliminary clinical observations on a new trigeminal reflex: the trigemino-cervical reflex. Neurology 46:479–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ertekin C, Celebisoy N, Uludağ B (2001) Trigeminocervical reflexes elicited by stimulation of the infraorbital nerve: head retraction reflex. J Clin Neurophysiol 18:378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sartucci F, Rossi A, Rossi B (1986) Trigemino cervical reflex in man. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 26:123–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leandri M, Gottlieb A, Cruccu G (2001) Head extensor reflex evoked by trigeminal stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1828–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakashima K, Thompson PD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Stell R, Marsden CD (1989) An exteroceptive reflex in the sternocleidomastoid muscle produced by electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve in normal subjects and patients with spasmodic torticollis. Neurology 39:1354–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Di Lazzaro V, Quartarone A, Higuchi K, Rothwell JC (1995) Short-latency trigemino-cervical reflexes in man. Exp Brain Res 102:474–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Serrao M, Cortese F, Andersen OK, Conte C, Spaich EG, Fragiotta G, Ranavolo A, Coppola G, Perrotta A, Pierelli F (2015) Modular organization of the head retraction responses elicited by electrical painful stimulation of the facial skin in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 126:2306–2313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Serrao M, Rossi P, Parisi L, Perrotta A, Bartolo M, Cardinali P, Amabile G, Pierelli F (2003) Trigemino-cervical-spinal reflexes in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1697–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kızıltan ME, Gunduz A, Kızıltan G, Tekeoğlu A, Sohtaoğlu M (2014) Brainstem and spinal reflex studies in patients with primary progressive freezing of gait. J Neurol Sci 343:51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Serrao M, Coppola G, Di Lorenzo C, Di Fabio R, Padua L, Sandrini G, Pierelli F (2010) Nociceptive trigeminocervical reflexes in healthy subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1563–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Serrao M, Perrotta A, Bartolo M, Fiermonte G, Pauri F, Rossi P, Parisi L, Pierelli F (2005) Enhanced trigemino-cervical-spinal reflex recovery cycle in pain-free migraineurs. Headache 45:1061–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Graham FK Presidential Address, 1974(1975) The more or less startling effects of weak prestimulation. Psycophysiology 12:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prentice SD, Drew T (2001) Contributions of the reticulospinal system to the postural adjustments occurring during voluntary gait modifications. J Neurophysiol 85:679–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Drew T, Prentice S, Schepens B (2004) Cortical and brainstem control of locomotion. Prog Brain Res 143:251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leon-Sarmiento FE, Peckham E, Leon-Ariza DS, Bara-Jimenez W, Hallett M (2015) Auditory and lower limb tactile prepulse inhibition in primary restless legs syndrome: clues to its pathophysiology. J Clin Neurophysiol 32:369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Serrao M, Di Fabio R, Bartolo M, Perrotta A, Tassorelli C, Coppola G, Davassi C, Padua L, Sandrini G, Pierelli F (2011) The contribution of trigemino-cervical reflexes in distinguishing progressive supranuclear palsy from multiple system atrophy. Clin Neurophysiol 122:1812–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meredith MA, Wallace MT, Stein BE (1992) Visual, auditory and somatosensory convergence in output neurons of the cat superior colliculus: multisensory properties of the tecto-reticulo-spinal projection. Exp Brain Res 88:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sasaki S, Yoshimura K, Naito K (2004) The neural control of orienting: role of multiple-branching reticulospinal neurons. Prog Brain Res 143:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ge HY, Collet T, Mørch CD, Arendt-Nielsen L, Andersen OK (2007) Depression of the human nociceptive withdrawal reflex by segmental and heterosegmental intramuscular electrical stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 118(7):1626–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meral E. Kızıltan
    • 1
  • Pınar Bekdik Şirinocak
    • 2
  • Tuba Akıncı
    • 3
  • Tuba Cerrahoğlu Şirin
    • 4
  • Burcu Nuran Arkalı
    • 1
  • Fatma Candan
    • 5
  • Ayşegül Gündüz
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Neurology, Cerrahpaşa School of MedicineIstanbul University-CerrahpaşaIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyKocaeli Derince Education and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyBeylikdüzü State HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Department of NeurologySisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  5. 5.Department of Neurology, Goztepe Education and Research HospitalIstanbul Medeniyet UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations