Psychometric properties of the Berg balance scale in idiopathic Parkinson’ disease in the drug off-phase
- 86 Downloads
Having an appropriate tool for assessment of the balance status during the drug off-phase in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) is relevant for clinical and research settings. Our objective was to assess the clinimetric properties of the Berg balance scale (BBS) during drug off-phase in PD.
Balance of 98 PD patients (mean age ± SD, 59.19 ± 10.88 years) was evaluated with the BBS. Other assessments in the study included the Fall Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), Functional Reach Test (FRT), Section II of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-3.0, Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), and Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale. All evaluations took place during the drug off-phase. Internal consistency and inter- and intra-rater reliability were evaluated by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. Dimensionality was explored by factor analysis. Discriminative validity was tested by comparing BBS score between PD patients with and without a history of falling.
Internal consistency was high (α = 0.98), as were intra- and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98 and 0.95, respectively). Factor analysis identified only one dimension for the BBS, whose convergent validity with FES-I, FRT, and domain mobility of the PDQ-39 were moderate or high (rS = |0.60–0.74|). Correlation of BBS with functional scales and PDQ-39 Summary Index was moderate (rS = |0.45–0.62|). Finally, the BBS showed a moderate strength to discriminate between PD patients with and without a history of falling.
Our study suggests that BBS has satisfactory internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity for measuring functional balance in people with PD during the drug off-phase.
KeywordsPsychometric properties Berg balance scale Parkinson’ disease Drug off-phase
This research was funded by Student Research Center of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. We have to express our appreciation to the patients and their family for their participation and cooperation through this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Student Research Center at Iran University of Medical Sciences (number, IR.IUMS.REC.1394.94-01-19-25617). All patients signed an informed consent for participation to the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- 1.Šumec R et al (2015) Psychological benefits of nonpharmacological methods aimed for improving balance in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Behav Neurol:2015Google Scholar
- 3.Rodríguez-Molinero A, Samà A, Pérez-López C, Rodríguez-Martín D, Alcaine S, Mestre B, Quispe P, Giuliani B, Vainstein G, Browne P, Sweeney D, Quinlan LR, Moreno Arostegui JM, Bayes À, Lewy H, Costa A, Annicchiarico R, Counihan T, Laighin GÒ, Cabestany J (2017) Analysis of correlation between an accelerometer-based algorithm for detecting Parkinsonian gait and UPDRS subscales. Front Neurol 8:431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Bloem BR, Marinus J, Almeida Q, Dibble L, Nieuwboer A, Post B, Ruzicka E, Goetz C, Stebbins G, Martinez-Martin P, Schrag A, for the Movement Disorders Society Rating Scales Committee (2016) Measurement instruments to assess posture, gait, and balance in Parkinson’s disease: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord 31(9):1342–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Babaei-Ghazani, A., et al. (2016) Reliability and validity of the Persian translation of Berg balance scale in Parkinson disease. Aging clinical and experimental researchGoogle Scholar
- 18.Baharlouei H, Salavati M, Akhbari B, Mosallanezhad Z, Mazaheri M, Negahban H (2013) Cross-cultural validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) using self-report and interview-based questionnaires among Persian-speaking elderly adults. Arch Gerontol and Geriatr 57 (3):339–344Google Scholar
- 21.Martinez-Martin, P., et al., (2013) Expanded and independent validation of the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). J Neurol p. 1–9Google Scholar
- 26.Piedmont, R. L. (2014) Inter-item correlations, in Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer. p. 3303–3304Google Scholar
- 28.Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J (2008) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
- 30.Landis, J. R. and G. G. Koch (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics p. 159–174Google Scholar
- 33.Rooney, R. (2006) Statistical evidence in medical trials: what do the data really tell us? Stephen D. Simon. OUP, 2006.£ 65. ISBN 0 19 856760 X, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- 35.Gibbons JD and Chakraborti S (2011) Nonparametric statistical inference, in International encyclopedia of statistical science. Springer. p. 977–979Google Scholar
- 41.Brusse KJ et al (2005) Testing functional performance in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 85(2):134–141Google Scholar