Neurology and the Internet: a review

  • Marcello Moccia
  • Francesco Brigo
  • Gioacchino Tedeschi
  • Simona Bonavita
  • Luigi Lavorgna
Review Article

Abstract

Nowadays, the Internet is the major source to obtain information about diseases and their treatments. The Internet is gaining relevance in the neurological setting, considering the possibility of timely social interaction, contributing to general public awareness on otherwise less-well-known neurological conditions, promoting health equity and improving the health-related coping. Neurological patients can easily find several online opportunities for peer interactions and learning. On the other hand, neurologist can analyze user-generated data to better understand patient needs and to run epidemiological studies. Indeed, analyses of queries from Internet search engines on certain neurological diseases have shown a strict temporal and spatial correlation with the “real world.” In this narrative review, we will discuss how the Internet is radically affecting the healthcare of people with neurological disorders and, most importantly, is shifting the paradigm of care from the hands of those who deliver care, into the hands of those who receive it. Besides, we will review possible limitations, such as safety concerns, financial issues, and the need for easy-to-access platforms.

Keywords

Health policy Infodemiology Internet Neurological disorders Online searches 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A preliminary draft of this paper has been written on the occasion of the Italian Conference of Neurology (Naples, October 14–17, 2017) where a special session on the Internet in Neurology entitled “DIGITAL HEALTH, WEB E SOCIAL MEDIA IN NEUROLOGIA” was held. We hereby thank chairs and speakers of that session (F. Ruggiero, L. Leocani, L. Gabaglio) and all those who attended and contributed to an inspiring discussion.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No funding was received related to the preparation of this article.

F.B. has received speakers’ honoraria from Eisai and PeerVoice, payment for consultancy from Eisai, and travel support from Eisai, ITALFARMACO, and UCB Pharma.

Other co-authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Somera L, Lee H, Badowski G, Cassel K (2016) Health information seeking, source trust and culture: comparative analysis of health information trends and needs between Guam and the U.S. J Health Commun 21:469–478CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hone T, Palladino R, Filippidis FT (2016) Association of searching for health-related information online with self-rated health in the European Union. Eur J Pub Health 26:748–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mueller J, Jay C, Harper S, Davies A, Vega J, Todd C (2017) Web use for symptom appraisal of physical health conditions: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 19:e202CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tallner A, Pfeifer K, Mäurer M (2016) Web-based interventions in multiple sclerosis: the potential of tele-rehabilitation. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 9:327–335CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Graetz I, Gordon N, Fung V, Hamity C, Reed ME (2016) The digital divide and patient portals. Med Care 54:772–779CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nguyen A, Mosadeghi S, Almario CV (2017) Persistent digital divide in access to and use of the internet as a resource for health information: results from a California population-based study. Int J Med Inform 103:49–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tennant B, Stellefson M, Dodd V et al (2015) eHealth literacy and web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults. J Med Internet Res 17:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brigo F, Igwe SC, Nardone R, Lochner P, Tezzon F, Otte WM (2015) Wikipedia and neurological disorders. J Clin Neurosci 22:1170–1172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larner A (2006) Searching the internet for medical information: frequency over time and by age and gender in an outpatient population in the UK. J Telemed Telecare 12:186–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moccia M, Palladino R, Falco A, Saccà F, Lanzillo R, Brescia Morra V (2016) Google trends: new evidence for seasonality of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 87:1028–1029CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Müller KI, Alstadhaug KB, Bekkelund SI (2016) Acceptability, feasibility, and cost of telemedicine for nonacute headaches: a randomized study comparing video and traditional consultations. J Med Internet Res 18:e140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Munneke M, Nijkrake M, Keus S, Kwakkel G, Berendse HW, Roos RA, Borm GF, Adang EM, Overeem S, Bloem BR, ParkinsonNet Trial Study Group (2010) Efficacy of community-based physiotherapy networks for patients with Parkinson’s disease: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 9:46–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nijkrake M, Keus S, Overeem S, Oostendorp R et al (2010) The ParkinsonNet concept: development, implementation and initial experience. Mov Disord 25:823–829CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomson A, Raciborska D, Baker D, Giovannoni G (2017) How to start a blog. Pract Neurol 17:224–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lavorgna L, De Stefano M, Buonanno D et al (2014) Social media and multiple sclerosis: an Italian experience. Neurology 82:S49004Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lavorgna L, Ippolito D, Esposito S, Tedeschi G, Bonavita S (2017) A disease in the age of web: how to help people with multiple sclerosis in social media interaction. Mult Scler Relat Disord 17:38–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dhand A, Luke DA, Lang CE, Lee JM (2016) Social networks and neurological illness. Nat Rev Neurol 12:05–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kalichman SC, Benotsch EG, Weinhardt L, Austin J, Webster L, Chauncey C (2003) Health-related internet use, coping, social support, and health indicators in people living with HIV/AIDS: preliminary results from a community survey. Health Psychol 22:11–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giovannoni G, Lee AJ, Hardy J (2015) Web-based assessment of Parkinson’s prodromal markers identifies GBA variants. Mov Disord 30:1002–1003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bjornsdottir G (1990) Online social support for individuals concerned with heart disease: observing gender differences. Proc AMIS Annu Symp 681:681–685Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moccia M, Lavorgna L, Lanzillo R, Brescia Morra V, Tedeschi G, Bonavita S (2016) The dress: transforming a web viral event into a scientific survey. Mult Scler Relat Disord 7:41–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baker D, Pepper G, Yauner F, Giovannoni G (2014) MSer—a new, neutral descriptor for someone with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 3:31–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frandsen M, Thow M, Ferguson SG (2016) The effectiveness of social media (Facebook) compared with more traditional advertising methods for recruiting eligible participants to Health Research studies: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. JMIR Res Protoc 5:e161CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lavorgna L, Moccia M, Russo A, Palladino R, Riccio L, Lanzillo R, Brescia Morra V, Tedeschi G, Bonavita S (2017) Health-care disparities stemming from sexual orientation of Italian patients with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional web-based study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 13:28–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Picillo M, Kou N, Barone P, Fasano A (2015) Recruitment strategies and patient selection in clinical trials for Parkinson’s disease: going viral and keeping science and ethics at the highest standards. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 21:1041–1048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Afshin A, Babalola D, Mclean M, Yu Z, Ma W, Chen CY, Arabi M, Mozaffarian D (2016) Information technology and lifestyle: a systematic evaluation of internet and mobile interventions for improving diet, physical activity, obesity, tobacco, and alcohol use. J Am Heart Assoc 5:e003058CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu S, Feng W, Chhatbar PY, Liu Y, Ji X, Ovbiagele B (2017) Mobile health as a viable strategy to enhance stroke risk factor control: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 378:140–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tallner A, Streber R, Hentschke C, Morgott M, Geidl W, Mäurer M, Pfeifer K (2016) Internet-Supported Physical Exercise Training for Persons with Multiple Sclerosis-A Randomised, Controlled Study. Int J Mol Sci 17(10).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17101667
  29. 29.
    Ye Y-Y, Chen N-K, Chen J, Liu J, Lin L, Liu YZ, Lang Y, Li XJ, Yang XJ, Jiang XJ (2016) Internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia (ICBT-i): a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 6:e010707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boeschoten RE, Dekker J, Uitdehaag BM et al (2012) Internet-based self-help treatment for depression in multiple sclerosis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 12:137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meyer B, Weiss M, Holtkamp M, Arnold S, Brückner K, Schröder J, Scheibe F, Nestoriuc Y (2017) Protocol for the ENCODE trial: evaluating a novel online depression intervention for persons with epilepsy. BMC Psychiatry 17:55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fischer A, Schröder J, Vettorazzi E, Wolf OT, Pöttgen J, Lau S, Heesen C, Moritz S, Gold SM (2015) An online programme to reduce depression in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2:217–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Won E, Doshi AM (2016) Assessing the content of YouTube videos in educating patients regarding common imaging examinations. J Am Coll Radiol 13:1509–1513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Larner A (2002) Use of internet medical websites and NHS direct by neurology outpatients before consultation. Int J Clin Pr 56:219–221Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guéguen A, Maillart E, Gallice T, Allaf B (2016) Evaluation of French-language internet sites dealing with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2:1–11Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kräenbring J, Penza TM, Gutmann J et al (2014) Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Wikipedia: a comparison with standard textbooks of pharmacology. PLoS One 9:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ozdoba C (2011) Wikipedia a good address for neuroradiologists? Clin Neuroradiol 21:181–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fragoso YD, Fragoso SD, Finkelsztejn A, Brooks JBB, Rebs RR (2012) Systematic review versus internet search: considerations about availability and reliability of medical information regarding pregnancy in women with multiple sclerosis. Rev Bras Epidemiol 15:896–903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lavi-Blau T, Ekstein D, Neufeld MY, Eyal S (2016) Use of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy and lactation: type of information provided by searching Google. Epilepsy Behav 55:113–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wong VSS, Stevenson M, Selwa L (2013) The presentation of seizures and epilepsy in YouTube videos. Epilepsy Behav 27:247–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gupta HV, Lee RW, Raina SK, Behrle BL, Hinduja A, Mittal MK (2016) Analysis of YouTube as a source of information for peripheral neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 53:27–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK (2015) Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics J 21:173–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stamelou M, Edwards MJ, Espay AJ, Fung VSC, Hallett M, Lang AE, Tijssen MAJ, Bhatia KP (2011) Movement disorders on YouTube—caveat spectator. N Engl J Med 365:1160–1161CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Muhammed L, Adcock JE, Sen A (2014) YouTube as a potential learning tool to help distinguish tonic–clonic seizures from nonepileptic attacks. Epilepsy Behav 37:221–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ghahari S, Forwell SJ (2016) Social media representation of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency intervention for multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care 18:49–57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mazanderani F, O’Neill B, Powell J (2013) “People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy. Patient Educ Couns 93:420–425CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brigo F, Erro R (2015) The readability of the English Wikipedia article on Parkinsons disease. Neurol Sci 36:1045–1046CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Brigo F, Otte WM, Igwe SC, Ausserer H, Nardone R, Tezzon F, Trinka E (2015) Information-seeking behaviour for epilepsy: an infodemiological study of searches for Wikipedia articles. Epileptic Disord 17:460–466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Moccia M, Carotenuto A, Massarelli M, Lanzillo R, Brescia Morra V (2016) Can people with multiple sclerosis actually understand what they read in the internet age? J Clin Neurosci 25:167–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Punia V, Dagar A, Agarwal N, He W, Hillen M (2014) Comparison of neurological healthcare oriented educational resources for patients on the internet. J Clin Neurosci 21:2179–2183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Eysenbach (2009) Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the internet. J Med Internet Res 11:e11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Brigo F, Tezzon F, Lochner P, Nardone R (2014) Magic Google in my hand, who is the sickest in my land? Can J Neurol Sci 41:542–544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bragazzi NL, Bacigaluppi S, Robba C, Siri A, Canepa G, Brigo F (2015) Infodemiological data of West-Nile virus disease in Italy in the study period 2004–2015. Data Brief 9:839–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bragazzi NL (2013) Infodemiology and infoveillance of multiple sclerosis in Italy. Mult Scler Int 013:924029Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Brigo F, Lochner P, Tezzon F, Nardone R (2014) Web search behavior for multiple sclerosis: an infodemiological study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 3:440–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    JJ K, Jalalpour M, Levin S, Washington RE, Pines JM, Rothman RE, Dugas AF (2016) Google flu trends spatial variability validated against emergency department influenza-related visits. J Med Internet Res e175:18Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brigo F, Ausserer H (2014) A Google fight between seizure and syncope. Seizure 23:86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ganzeboom KS, Mairuhu G, Reitsma JB, Linzer M, Wieling W, van Dijk N (2006) Lifetime cumulative incidence of syncope in the general population: a study of 549 Dutch subjects aged 35–60 years. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 17:1172–1176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hauser WA, Annegers JF, Kurland LT (1993) Incidence of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures in Rochester, Minnesota; 1935–1984. Epilepsia 34:453–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Forsgren L, Bucht G, Eriksson S, Bergmark L (1996) Incidence and clinical characterization of unprovoked seizures in adults: a prospective population-based study. Epilepsia 37:224–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Brigo F, Erro R (2016) Why do people google movement disorders? An infodemiological study of information seeking behaviors. Neurol Sci 37:781–787CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Brigo F (2015) Impact of news of celebrity illness on online search behavior: the ‘Robin Williams’ phenomenon. J Public Health (Oxf) 37:555–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Brigo F, Otte WM, Igwe SC, Tezzon F, Nardone R (2015) Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 44:35–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gafson AR, Giovannoni G (2014) CCSVI-A. A call to clinicans and scientists to vocalise in an internet age. Mult Scler Relat Disord 3:143–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bragazzi N, Martini M, Igwe S, Vecchio I, Barberis I, Tornali C, Licata M, Borromeo F, Cardinale A, Adawi M, Brigo F (2017) Has the ice bucket challenge really increased people’s awareness of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? Insights and ethical implications from Google trends and Wikipedia: a 2 years-follow up. Acta Medica Mediterr 33:8–2Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Landen R (2014) Ice bucket challenge offers invigorating fundraising lessons. Mod Healthc 44:12Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Brigo F, Igwe SC, Nardone R, Orioli A, Otte WM (2016) Cancer information disparities on the internet: an infodemiological study. J Cancer Policy 8:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Jongstra S, Beishuizen C, Andrieu S, Barbera M, van Dorp M, van de Groep B, Guillemont J, Mangialasche F, van Middelaar T, Moll van Charante E, Soininen H, Kivipelto M, Richard E (2017) Development and validation of an interactive internet platform for older people: the Healthy Ageing Through Internet Counselling in the Elderly study. Telemed e-Health 23:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Koo YS, Yang KS, Seok HY, Lee SK, Lee IK, Cho YW, Lee JH, Hwang H, Kim KJ, Jung KY (2012) Characteristics of patients with epilepsy who use a website providing healthcare information about epilepsy in South Korea. Epilepsy Behav 25:156–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Pramuka M, Hendrickson R, Van Cott AC (2010) Survey results of internet and computer usage in veterans with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 17:366–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Masukume G, Kipersztok L, Das D, Shafee TMA, Laurent MR, Heilman JM (2016) Medical journals and Wikipedia: a global health matter. Lancet Glob Health 4:e791CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
  73. 73.
    Lavorgna L, Russo A, De Stefano M, Lanzillo R, Esposito S, Moshtari F et al (2017) Health-related coping and social interaction in people with multiple sclerosis supported by a social network: pilot study with a new methodological approach. Interact J Med Res 6:e10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Betton V, Borschmann R, Docherty M, Coleman S, Brown M, Henderson C (2015) The role of social media in reducing stigma and discrimination. Br J Psychiatry 206:443–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Welch V, Petkovic J, Pardo Pardo J, Rader T, Tugwell P (2016) Interactive social media interventions to promote health equity: an overview of reviews. Heal Promot Chronic Dis Prev Canada 36:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Widmer RJ, Engler NB, Geske JB, Klarich KW, Timimi FK (2016) An academic healthcare twitter account: the Mayo Clinic experience. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 19:360–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeuroscienceFederico II University of NaplesNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement SciencesUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyFranz Tappeiner HospitalMeranoItaly
  4. 4.1st Clinic of NeurologyUniversity of CampaniaNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations