Advertisement

Speed–accuracy trade-off, detour reaching and response to PHA in Carib grackles

  • Simon DucatezEmail author
  • Jean-Nicolas Audet
  • Louis Lefebvre
Original Paper

Abstract

Performance on different cognitive tasks varies between individuals within species. Recent evidence suggests that, in some species, this variation reflects the existence of coherent cognitive strategies bringing together positive and negative relationships between tasks. For example, Carib grackles show a speed–accuracy trade-off, where individuals that are fast at solving novel problems make more errors at discrimination learning than individuals that are slow solvers. Pathogens are thought to play a major role in shaping variation in cognition, either because different cognitive strategies lead to differential exposure to pathogens, or because investment in cognitive abilities is costly, limiting the ability to invest in anti-pathogen responses. In both cases, immunocompetence is expected to co-vary with cognition. Here, using wild-caught Carib grackles, we tested whether performance on reversal learning and detour-reaching tasks is associated with the speed–accuracy trade-off found in a previous study. In parallel, we measured the response of individuals to a phytohemagglutinin (PHA) injection, an immunoecological technique that assesses general immunity. Performance on two problem-solving tasks and two learning tasks was characterized by a speed–accuracy trade-off, reversal learning and discrimination learning performance being better in individuals with slower problem-solving performance. Detour-reaching performance was independent from this trade-off. Finally, our results show that PHA response was higher in accurate but slow grackles, and higher in grackles with better detour-reaching performance. Investigating the emergence and maintenance of variation in cognition in a framework integrating variation in physiology and life history is likely a major step towards a better understanding of the evolution of cognition.

Keywords

Cognitive strategy Cognitive styles Detour reaching Pace of life syndrome Phytohemagglutinin Quiscalus lugubris fortirostris 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Rowe for his help in building the aviaries at the Bellairs Research Institute, and L. Jacquin for helpful discussions.

Funding

This work was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Fondation Fyssen to S.D., a FQRNT doctoral scholarship to J.N.A and an NSERC Discovery Grant to L.L.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The three authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All our procedures were approved by the McGill University Animal Care Committee (Animal Use Protocol 2013–7140) as well as the Natural Heritage Department of the Barbados Ministry of Environment and Drainage (permit 8434/56), and all applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

10071_2019_1258_MOESM1_ESM.docx (27 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 26 KB)
10071_2019_1258_MOESM2_ESM.wmv (14.2 mb)
Movie showing a grackle performing on the detour-reaching task. The first 55 seconds show different moments of the bird’s first trial as it is trying to get the food by directly pecking at the Plexiglas divider, until it finally makes the detour to reach the food. The last 10 seconds show a successful trial, whereby the bird directly makes the detour, without first pecking at the Plexiglas divider (WMV 14560 KB)
10071_2019_1258_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 12 KB)

References

  1. Anderson RC, Searcy WA, Peters S et al (2017) Song learning and cognitive ability are not consistently related in a songbird. Anim Cogn 20:309–320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1053-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audet J-N, Ducatez S, Lefebvre L (2016) The town bird and the country bird: problem solving and immunocompetence vary with urbanization. Behav Ecol 27:637–644.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avrameas S (1991) Natural autoantibodies: from ‘horror autotoxicus’ to ‘gnothi seauton’. Immunol Today 12:154–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5699(05)80045-3 Google Scholar
  4. Bell A (2013) Randomized or fixed order for studies of behavioral syndromes? Behav Ecol 24:16–20.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beran MJ (2015) The comparative science of “self-control”: what are we talking about? Front Psychol 6:51Google Scholar
  6. Boes M (2000) Role of natural and immune IgM antibodies in immune responses. Mol Immunol 37:1141–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bókony V, Lendvai ÁZ, Vágási CI et al (2014) Necessity or capacity? Physiological state predicts problem-solving performance in house sparrows. Behav Ecol 25:124–135.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond AB, Kamil AC, Balda RP (2007) Serial reversal learning and the evolution of behavioral flexibility in three species of North American corvids (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus, Nucifraga columbiana, Aphelocoma californica). J Comp Psychol 121:372–379.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boogert NJ, Giraldeau L-A, Lefebvre L (2008) Song complexity correlates with learning ability in zebra finch males. Anim Behav 76:1735–1741.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boogert NJ, Anderson RC, Peters S et al (2011) Song repertoire size in male song sparrows correlates with detour reaching, but not with other cognitive measures. Anim Behav 81:1209–1216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boughton RK, Joop G, Armitage SAO (2011) Outdoor immunology: methodological considerations for ecologists. Funct Ecol 25:81–100.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01817.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burkart JM, Schubiger MN, van Schaik CP (2016) The evolution of general intelligence. Behav Brain Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000959 Google Scholar
  13. Cauchard L (2015) Variations interindividuelles des performances cognitives et conséquences évolutives chez une population naturelle de Mésange charbonnière. Université de Montréal, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  14. Cauchard L, Angers B, Boogert NJ, Doligez B (2016) Effect of an anti-malaria drug on behavioural performance on a problem-solving task: An experiment in wild great tits. Behav Process 133:24–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chittka L, Dyer AG, Bock F, Dornhaus A (2003) Psychophysics: bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy. Nature 424:388–388.  https://doi.org/10.1038/424388a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chittka L, Skorupski P, Raine NE (2009) Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol Evol 24:400–407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deaner RO, Schaik CP van, Johnson V (2006) Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies. Evol Psychol 4:147470490600400130.  https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490600400114 Google Scholar
  18. Devoogd TJ, Krebs JR, Healy SD, Purvis A (1993) Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song: comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 254:75–82.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1993.0129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dosmann A, Brooks KC, Mateo JM (2015) Evidence for a mechanism of phenotypic integration of behaviour and innate immunity in a wild rodent: implications for animal personality and ecological immunology. Anim Behav 101:179–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.12.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ducatez S, Audet JN, Lefebvre L (2015a) Problem-solving and learning in Carib grackles: individuals show a consistent speed–accuracy trade-off. Anim Cogn 18:485–496.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0817-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ducatez S, Clavel J, Lefebvre L (2015b) Ecological generalism and behavioural innovation in birds: technical intelligence or the simple incorporation of new foods? J Anim Ecol 84:79–89.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ducatez S, Overington S, Audet J et al (2018) Carib grackles—field and lab work on a tame, opportunistic island icterid. In: Bueno-Guerra N, Amici F (eds) Field and laboratory methods in animal cognition—a comparative guide. Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunn JC, Cole EF, Quinn JL (2011) Personality and parasites: sex-dependent associations between avian malaria infection and multiple behavioural traits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1459–1471.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1156-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garamszegi LZ, Erritzøe J, Møller AP (2007) Feeding innovations and parasitism in birds. Biol J Linn Soc 90:441–455.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00733.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Griffin AS, Guez D, Lermite F, Patience M (2013) Tracking changing environments: innovators are fast, but not flexible learners. PLoS One 8:e84907.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson-Ulrich L, Johnson-Ulrich Z, Holekamp K (2018) Proactive behavior, but not inhibitory control, predicts repeated innovation by spotted hyenas tested with a multi-access box. Anim Cogn 21:379–392.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1174-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kluen E, Siitari H, Brommer JE (2013) Testing for between individual correlations of personality and physiological traits in a wild bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:205–213.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1635-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koolhaas JM (2008) Coping style and immunity in animals: making sense of individual variation. Brain Behav Immun 22:662–667.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2007.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kotrschal A, Kolm N, Penn DJ (2016) Selection for brain size impairs innate, but not adaptive immune responses. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 283:20152857.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krams I, Vrublevska J, Cirule D et al (2013) Stress, behaviour and immunity in wild-caught wintering great tits (Parus major). Ethology 119:397–406.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lefebvre L, Templeton J, Brown K, Koelle M (1997) Carib grackles imitate conspecific and zenaida dove tutors. Behaviour 134:1003–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156853997X00368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lefebvre L, Ducatez S, Audet J-N (2016) Feeding innovations in a nested phylogeny of Neotropical passerines. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 371:20150188.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MacLean EL, Hare B, Nunn CL et al (2014) The evolution of self-control. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:E2140–E2148.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323533111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malá H, Andersen LG, Christensen RF et al (2015) Prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in behavioural flexibility and posttraumatic functional recovery: reversal learning and set-shifting in rats. Brain Res Bull 116:34–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2015.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin LB, Han P, Lewittes J et al (2006) Phytohemagglutinin-induced skin swelling in birds: histological support for a classic immunoecological technique. Funct Ecol 20:290–299.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01094.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin TE, Arriero E, Majewska A (2011) A trade-off between embryonic development rate and immune function of avian offspring is revealed by considering embryonic temperature. Biol Lett rsbl20101031.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.1031 Google Scholar
  37. McCabe CM, Reader SM, Nunn CL (2015) Infectious disease, behavioural flexibility and the evolution of culture in primates. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 282:20140862.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0862 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Overington SE, Cauchard L, Côté K-A, Lefebvre L (2011) Innovative foraging behaviour in birds: What characterizes an innovator? Behav Process 87:274–285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Palacios MG, Martin TE (2006) Incubation period and immune function: a comparative field study among coexisting birds. Oecologia 146:505–512.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0220-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reader SM, Hager Y, Laland KN (2011) The evolution of primate general and cultural intelligence. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 366:1017–1027.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Réale D, Garant D, Humphries MM et al (2010) Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:4051–4063.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ricklefs RE, Wikelski M (2002) The physiology/life-history nexus. Trends Ecol Evol 17:462–468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02578-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rothbart MK, Posner MI, Hartlage L, Telzrow CF (1985) Temperament and the development of selfregulation. In: The neuropsychology of individual differences: a developmental perspective. Plenum, New-York, pp 93–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rowe C, Healy SD (2014) Measuring variation in cognition. Behav Ecol 25:1287–1292.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seferta A, Guay P-J, Marzinotto E, Lefebvre L (2001) Learning differences between feral pigeons and zenaida doves: the role of neophobia and human proximity. Ethology 107:281–293.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00658.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sih A, Del Giudice M (2012) Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:2762–2772.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sild E, Sepp T, Hõrak P (2011) Behavioural trait covaries with immune responsiveness in a wild passerine. Brain Behav Immun 25:1349–1354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2011.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sol D, Sayol F, Ducatez S, Lefebvre L (2016) The life-history basis of behavioural innovations. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 371:20150187.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Soler JJ, Peralta-Sánchez JM, Martín-Vivaldi M et al (2011) Cognitive skills and bacterial load: comparative evidence of costs of cognitive proficiency in birds. Naturwissenschaften 99:111–122.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0875-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sommer-Trembo C, Plath M (2018) Consistent individual differences in associative learning speed are not linked to boldness in female Atlantic mollies. Anim Cogn 21:661–670.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1201-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thornton A, Lukas D (2012) Individual variation in cognitive performance: developmental and evolutionary perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 367:2773–2783.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thornton A, Isden J, Madden JR (2014) Toward wild psychometrics: linking individual cognitive differences to fitness. Behav Ecol 25:1299–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vas Z, Lefebvre L, Johnson KP et al (2011) Clever birds are lousy: Co-variation between avian innovation and the taxonomic richness of their amblyceran lice. Int J Parasitol 41:1295–1300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang M-Y, Brennan CH, Lachlan RF, Chittka L (2015) Speed–accuracy trade-offs and individually consistent decision making by individuals and dyads of zebrafish in a colour discrimination task. Anim Behav 103:277–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Webster SJ, Lefebvre L (2001) Problem solving and neophobia in a columbiform–passeriform assemblage in Barbados. Anim Behav 62:23–32.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wickelgren WA (1977) Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychol (Amst) 41:67–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations