Innovation is widely linked to cognitive ability, brain size, and adaptation to novel conditions. However, successful innovation appears to be influenced by both cognitive factors, such as inhibitory control, and non-cognitive behavioral traits. We used a multi-access box (MAB) paradigm to measure repeated innovation, the number of unique innovations learned across trials, by 10 captive spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). Spotted hyenas are highly innovative in captivity and also display striking variation in behavioral traits, making them good model organisms for examining the relationship between innovation and other behavioral traits. We measured persistence, motor diversity, motivation, activity, efficiency, inhibitory control, and neophobia demonstrated by hyenas while interacting with the MAB. We also independently assessed inhibitory control with a detour cylinder task. Most hyenas were able to solve the MAB at least once, but only four hyenas satisfied learning criteria for all four possible solutions. Interestingly, neither measure of inhibitory control predicted repeated innovation. Instead, repeated innovation was predicted by a proactive syndrome of behavioral traits that included high persistence, high motor diversity, high activity and low neophobia. Our results suggest that this proactive behavioral syndrome may be more important than inhibitory control for successful innovation with the MAB by members of this species.
Innovation Inhibitory control Cognition Problem-solving Behavioral syndromes
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank Courtney Frenchak at the Oak Creek Zoological Conservatory, Heather Genter and the other zookeepers at the Denver Zoo, and undergraduate research assistants Mike Kowalski and Paige Barnes for reliability coding.
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grants OISE 1556407, IOS 1755089, and DEB 1353110 to KEH, and by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to LJU. LJU was also supported by fellowships from the College of Natural Sciences, the Integrative Biology Department, and the program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior at Michigan State University. This work was also supported in part by the BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, funded by National Science Foundation Grant OIA 0939454.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
The data collection procedure followed here was reviewed by Michigan State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee: AUF #04/16-050-00. All procedures were also reviewed and approved for each zoological institution’s ethical guidelines.
Herrmann E, Call J, Hernàndez-Lloreda MV et al (2007) Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science 317:1360–1366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Holekamp KE, Sakai S, Lundrigan B (2007) The spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) as a model system for study of the evolution of intelligence. J Mammal 88:545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller CA, Riemer S, Virányi Z et al (2016) Inhibitory control, but not prolonged object-related experience appears to affect physical problem–solving performance of pet dogs. PLoS ONE 11:e0147753CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E et al (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1373–1379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/