Advertisement

Antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with proliferative and membranous lupus nephritis

  • Xiaokai Ding
  • Chaosheng Chen
  • Ji Zhang
  • Guoyuan LuEmail author
Brief Report

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in patients with proliferative and membranous lupus nephritis (LN). Patients hospitalized with LN from July 2014 to December 2017 were selected. Levels of serum IgG, IgA, and IgM anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies, anti-β2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2-GPI) antibodies, and lupus anticoagulant (LAC) were measured. Other clinical and pathological data were obtained at the time of hospitalization for diagnosis. Overall, 75 patients with proliferative LN and 31 patients with membranous LN were analyzed. Significant differences were found between the two groups in the detection rates of aCL antibodies (45.3% vs 22.7%, p = 0.029) and IgG-aCL antibodies (40% vs 12.9%, p = 0.007). The aCL antibody–positive proliferative LN patients (n = 34) had lower serum complement C3 and C4 levels (p = 0.010 and p = 0.021, respectively) and higher intensity of complement C1q deposition in kidney tissue than the aCL antibody–negative proliferative LN patients (n = 41) (p = 0.003). Our work suggests that aCL antibodies, especially IgG-aCL antibodies, may play a role in the damage caused by proliferative LN, and this process may involve the classical pathway of complement activation.

Key Points

• Classes III + V and IV + V LN, which have both proliferative and membranous LN features, were excluded.

• The proliferative LN group had significantly higher detection rates of aCL and IgG-aCL than the membranous LN group.

• aCL antibodies, especially IgG-aCL antibodies, may play a role in the damage caused by proliferative LN, and this process may involve the classical pathway of complement activation.

Keywords

Anti-aCL antibodies Complement activation Lupus nephritis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. LY15H050008).

Compliance with ethical standards

This study was approved by the Wenzhou Medical University Research Ethics Committee. All patients provided verbal consent to participate in the study.

Disclosures

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Levine JS, Branch DW, Rauch J (2002) The antiphospholipid syndrome. N Engl J Med 346:752–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T et al (2006) International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost 4:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petri M (2000) Epidemiology of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. J Autoimmun 15:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taraborelli M, Leuenberger L, Zhang W et al (2014) The effect of clinically significant antiphospholipid antibody positivity on organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 66:8–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levy Y, Gearge J, Ziporen L et al (1998) Massive proteinuria as a main manifestation of primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Pathobiology 66:49–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moroni G, Ventura D, Riva P, Panzeri P, Quaglini S, Banfi G, Simonini P, Bader R, Meroni PL, Ponticelli C (2004) Antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with an increased risk for chronic renal insufficiency in patients with lupus nephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 43:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsuruta Y, Uchida K, Itabashi M et al (2009) Antiphospholipid antibodies and renal outcomes in patients with lupus nephritis. Inter Med 48:1875–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fofi C, Cuadrado MJ, Godfrey T, Abbs I, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR (2001) Lack of association between antiphospholipid antibody and WHO classification in lupus nephritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 19:75–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Naiker IP, Rughubar KN, Duursma J et al (2000) Anticardiolipin antibodies in South African patients with lupus nephritis: a clinical and renal pathological study. Am J Nephrol 20:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pierangeli SS, Vega-Ostertag M, Liu X et al (2005) Complement activation: a novel pathogenic mechanism in the antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1051:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ruiz-Irastorza G, Crowther M, Branch W, Khamashta MA (2010) Antiphospholipid syndrome. Lancet 376:1498–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hochberg MC (1997) Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 40:1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM et al (2004) The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zheng H, Chen Y, Ao W et al (2009) Antiphospholipid antibody profiles in lupus nephritis with glomerular microthrombosis: a prospective study of 124 cases. Arthritis Res Ther 11:R93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tsokos GC (2011) Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 365:2110–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parodis I, Arnaud L, Gerhardsson J, Zickert A, Sundelin B, Malmström V, Svenungsson E, Gunnarsson I (2016) Antiphospholipid antibodies in lupus nephritis. PLoS One 11(6):e0158076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buttgereit F, Grünewald T, Schüler-Maué W, Burmester GR, Hiepe F (1997) Value of anticardiolipin antibodies for monitoring disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus and other rheumatic diseases. Clin Rheumatol 16:562–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sarabi ZS, Sahebari M, Rezaie AE et al (2018) The relationship between systemic lupus erythematosus activity and persistent positive antiphospholipid antibodies. Curr Rheumatol Rev 14:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shen Y, Chen XW, Sun CY et al (2010) Association between anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies and renal glomerular C4d deposition in lupus nephritis patients with glomerular microthrombosis: a prospective study of 155 cases. Lupus 19:1195–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Watanabe H, Sugimoto M, Asano T, Sato S, Suzuki E, Takahashi A, Katakura K, Kobayashi H, Ohira H (2015) Relationship of complement activation route with clinical manifestations in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective observational study. Mod Rheumatol 25:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pierangeli SS, Girardi G, Vega Ostertag M et al (2005) Requirement of activation of complement C3 and C5 for antipho8pholipid antibody-mediated thrombophilia. Arthritis Rheum 52:2120–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garabet L, Gilboe IM, Mowinckel MC, Jacobsen AF, Mollnes TE, Sandset PM, Jacobsen EM (2016) Antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with low levels of complement C3 and C4 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Immunol 84:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lood C, Tydén H, Gullstrand B et al (2014) Platelet activation and antiphospholipid antibodies collaborate in the activation of the complement system on platelets in systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS One 9:e99386CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NephrologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of NephrologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhouChina

Personalised recommendations