Comparing the association of widespread pain, multi-joint pain and low back pain with measures of pain sensitization and function in people with knee osteoarthritis
To compare 1. measures of pain sensitization (PS) in people with widespread pain (WSP), multi-joint pain, low back pain (LBP) and knee osteoarthritis (KOA) only, in people with knee OA and 2. results of self-reported function and physical performance tests amongst these sub groups.
Patients with knee OA consulting an orthopaedic surgeon were recruited from three Montreal area hospitals. A body homunculus was used to identify the presence of WSP (Y/N), multi-joint pain using a joint count (≥ 2 joints) and LBP (Y/N). Tests included pressure pain thresholds (PPT), temporal summation (TS), conditioned pain modulation and three physical performance tests. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) assessed self-reported function. Means were compared with Welch’s ANOVA, post hoc tests and multiple regression analysis were performed.
Two hundred twenty-one participants were evaluated (mean age: 63.4 ± 9.9 years, females n = 135 (61.1%)). Those with WSP significantly differed from those with LBP on PPT mean − 1.4, 95%CI (− 2.4, − 0.4), TS 10.3 (2.1, 18.5) and the stair climb test (SCT) 5.6 (1.3, 9.9). Those with WSP significantly differed from those with KOA only on TS 9.5 (1.0, 18.1), SCT 6.3 (2.0, 10.6) and KOOS − 14.2 (− 26.5, − 2.0).
• In people with knee OA and widespread pain, measures of sensitization, self-reported function and physical performance were poorer compared with those with knee OA and LBP, knee OA and multi-joint pain or knee OA only.
• Clinicians can consider these outcomes when planning management for these subgroups planning a comprehensive treatment program for this subgroup.
KeywordsKnee osteoarthritis Low back pain Multi joint pain Pain sensitization Widespread pain
LC received funds for this work from the Quebec Rehabilitation Research Network clinical program grant and from the International Association for the Study of Pain Early Career Grant.
Compliance with ethical standards
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the CIUSSS de l’Est de Montreal and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.
- 1.Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F et al (2017) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 390(10100):1211–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Public Health Agency of Canada. Life with Arthritis in Canada: a personal and public health challenge 2010 [Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cd-mc/arthritis-arthrite/lwaic-vaaac-10/pdf/arthritis-2010-eng.pdf.
- 3.Heidari B (2011) Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian J Int Med 2(2):205Google Scholar
- 18.Carlesso LC, Segal N, Curtis JR, Wise BL, Law LF, Nevitt M et al (2016) Knee pain severity rather than structural damage is a risk factor for incident widespread pain: the Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) Study. Arthritis Care ResGoogle Scholar
- 24.Neogi T, Frey-Law L, Scholz J, Niu J, Arendt-Nielsen L, Woolf C, et al. Sensitivity and sensitisation in relation to pain severity in knee osteoarthritis: trait or state? Ann Rheum Dis. 2013:annrheumdis-2013-204191.Google Scholar