Advertisement

The gait deviations of ankylosing spondylitis with hip involvement

  • Guoning Zhang
  • Jia Li
  • Zhengliang Xia
  • Weidong XuEmail author
Original Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the study was to investigate the gait deviations of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with hip involvement.

Methods

Thirty-six subjects, including 18 AS patients with hip involvement (AS group) and 18 healthy people (control subjects, CS group), were enrolled in the study. Three-dimensional gait analysis of the AS group and CS group was performed. Kinematic parameters, kinetic parameters and surface electromyography (sEMG) during the gait cycle were measured.

Results

The AS patients with hip involvement had a lower gait velocity, shorter step length and shorter stride length. In the hip angles, there was significantly decreased flexion, excessive abduction and excessive external rotation; there was excessive flexion in the knee and reduction in plantar flexion of the ankle. AS patients had increased forward trunk flexion, excessive obliquity and restricted rotation of the trunk during the gait cycle. The hip moments of the AS group showed a significant reduction in flexion, abduction and external rotation during the gait cycle. The root mean square amplitude of the sEMG for the rectus femoris in the AS group was higher than that in the CS group.

Conclusion

The gait deviations in AS patients with hip involvement were described in this study. The gait analysis results demonstrated statistically significant alterations regarding the kinematic and kinetic gait parameters for the patients included in the sample. Coordination and balance were impaired by the disease. An efficient physical exercise plan can be formulated according to the results of gait analysis.

Keywords

Ankylosing spondylitis Gait analysis Kinematics Kinetics 

Abbreviations

AS

ankylosing spondylitis

BMI

body mass index

BASDAI

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index

BASFI

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index

BASMI

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index

VAS pain

Visual Analog Scale for Pain

BASRI-h

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Hip Radiology Index

BASRI-SIJ

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index on Sacroiliac Joint

GRF

ground reaction force

PvGRF

peak vertical ground reaction force

sEMG

surface electromyography

IEMG

integrated electromyography

RMS

root mean square amplitude

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the patients and volunteers that participated in the study.

Authors’ contributions

Guoning Zhang, Jia Li and Zhengliang Xia contributed equally to the manuscript; they conceived and designed the study. Guoning Zhang and Jia Li collected the clinical data. Guoning Zhang and Zhengliang Xia conducted the gait analysis and performed the statistical analysis. Weidong Xu approved the final version.

Funding sources

This research was supported by funding from the “Establishment of parachute training computer simulation system for parachute training” (Grant No. BKJ14J004).

Compliance with ethical standards

All patients provided written informed consent. The study was conducted by the orthopaedic department of our hospital and was approved by the clinical research ethics committee of Changhai Hospital (CHEC2013-194).

Disclosures

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Jiménez-Balderas FJ, Mintz G (1993) Ankylosing spondylitis: clinical course in women and men. J Rheumatol 20(12):2069–2072PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yacoub YI, Laatiris A, Hajjaj-Hassouni N (2012) Gender and disease features in Moroccan patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 31(2):293–297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-011-1819-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cruyssen BV, Muñozgomariz E, Font P, Mulero J, Vlam KD, Boonen A, Vazquezmellado J, Flores D, Vastesaeger N, Collantes E (2010) Hip involvement in ankylosing spondylitis: epidemiology and risk factors associated with hip replacement surgery. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49(1):73–81.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kep174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim TJ, Kim TH (2010) Clinical spectrum of ankylosing spondylitis in Korea. Joint Bone Spine 77(3):235–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2009.11.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turner DE, Helliwell PS, Siegel KL, Woodburn J (2008) Biomechanics of the foot in rheumatoid arthritis: identifying abnormal function and the factors associated with localised disease 'impact. Clin Biomech 23(1):93–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broström EW, Esbjörnsson AC, Von HJ, Iversen MD (2012) Gait deviations in individuals with inflammatory joint diseases and osteoarthritis and the usage of three-dimensional gait analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 26(3):409–422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2012.05.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barkham N, Coates LC, Keen H, Hensor E, Fraser A, Redmond A, Cawkwell L, Emery P (2010) Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of etanercept in the prevention of work disability in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 69(11):1926–1928.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.121327 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Din SD, Carraro E, Sawacha Z, Guiotto A, Bonaldo L, Masiero S, Cobelli C (2011) Impaired gait in ankylosing spondylitis. Med Biol Eng Comput 49(7):801–809.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0731-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zebouni L, Helliwell PS, Howe A, Wright V (1992) Gait analysis in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 51(7):898–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Helliwell PS, Smeathers JE, Wright V (1989) Shock absorption by the spinal column in normals and in ankylosing spondylitis. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 203(4):187–190.  https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1989_203_037_01 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sahin N, Ozcan E, Baskent A, Karan A, Kasikcioglu E (2011) Muscular kinetics and fatigue evaluation of knee using by isokinetic dynamometer in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Acta Reumatol Port 36(3):252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turan Y, Duruöz MT, Bal S, Guvenc A, Cerrahoglu L, Gurgan A (2007) Assessment of fatigue in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 27(9):847–852.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-007-0313-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aydog E, Depedibi R, Bal A, Eksioglu E, Unlu E, Cakci A (2005) Dynamic postural balance in ankylosing spondylitis patients. Rheumatology 45(4):445–448.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kei192 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bot SD, Caspers M, Royen BJV, Toussaint HM, Kingma I (1999) Biomechanical analysis of posture in patients with spinal kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis: a pilot study. Rheumatology 38(5):441–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cappozzo A (1984) Gait analysis methodology. Hum Mov Sci 3(1–2):27–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(84)90004-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simon SR (2004) Quantification of human motion: gait analysis—benefits and limitations to its application to clinical problems. J Biomech 37(12):1869–1880.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.047 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chiu M-C, Wang M-J (2007) The effect of gait speed and gender on perceived exertion, muscle activity, joint motion of lower extremity, ground reaction force and heart rate during normal walking. Gait Posture 25(3):385–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Technometrics 31(4):499–500.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1989.104886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Linden SVD, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27(4):361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mackay K, Mack C, Brophy S, Calin A (2010) The bath ankylosing spondylitis radiology index (BASRI): a new, validated approach to disease assessment. Arthritis Rheum 41(12):2263–2270.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199812)41:12<2263::AID-ART23>3.0.CO;2-I CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4):737–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21(12):2286–2291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, O'Hea J, Mallorie P, Jenkinson T (1994) A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 21(12):2281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Feldtkeller E (2008) Proposal of a linear definition of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) and comparison with the 2-step and 10-step definitions. Ann Rheum Dis 67(4):489–493.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.074724 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mccormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S (1988) Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med 18(4):1007–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI (1995) The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 27(1):27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heinrichs K (1998) Introduction to surface electromyography. Pearson Education/Prentice Hall, pp 527–531Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park WH, Kim YH, Lee TR, Sung PS (2012) Factors affecting shoulder–pelvic integration during axial trunk rotation in subjects with recurrent low back pain. Eur Spine J 21(7):1316–1323.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2280-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Camomilla V, Cereatti A, Cutti AG, Fantozzi S, Stagni R, Vannozzi G (2017) Methodological factors affecting joint moments estimation in clinical gait analysis: a systematic review. Biomed Eng Online 16(1):106.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0396-x. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mangone M, Scettri P, Paoloni M, Procaccianti R, Spadaro A, Santilli V (2011) Pelvis-shoulder coordination during level walking in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Gait Posture. 34(1):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carroll M, Parmar P, Dalbeth N, Boocock M, Rome K (2015) Gait characteristics associated with the foot and ankle in inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:134.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0596-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    He C, He X, Tong W, Zheng W, Zhang T, Zhao J, Xu W (2016) The effect of total hip replacement on employment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 35(12):2975–2981.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-016-3431-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jeong H, Eun YH, Kim IY, Kim H, Lee J, Koh EM, Cha HS (2017) Characteristics of hip involvement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in Korea. Korean J Intern Med 32(1):158–164.  https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2015.229 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Perry J, Burnfield J M, Cabico L M(2010) Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. SlackGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Burnfield JM, Josephson KR, Powers CM, Rubenstein LZ (2000) The influence of lower extremity joint torque on gait characteristics in elderly men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81(9):1153–1157.  https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.7174 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rasch A, Byström AH, Dalén N, Martinezcarranza N, Berg HE (2009) Persisting muscle atrophy two years after replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 91(5):583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beaulieu ML, Lamontagne MBeaule PE (2010) Lower limb biomechanics during gait do not return to normal following total hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 32(2):269–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.05.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vigotsky AD, Halperin I, Lehman GJ, Trajano GS, Vieira TM (2017) Interpreting signal amplitudes in surface electromyography studies in sport and rehabilitation sciences. Front Physiol 8:985.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00985 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsTongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of OrthopedicsChanghai Hospital Affiliated to the Second Military Medical UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.School of KinesiologyShanghai University of SportShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations