Effect of randomly distributed fibre on triaxial shear behavior of loess

  • Baoqin Lian
  • Jianbing PengEmail author
  • Hongbin ZhanEmail author
  • Xinsheng Cui
Original Paper


Soil reinforcement using randomly distributed fibres to improve the shear strength has been identified as an effective and environment-friendly technique in engineering applications. Loess used in geotechnical constructions can suffer from cracking due to shear failure. To increase loess shear strength, triaxial compression tests were carried out to evaluate the effect of randomly distributed fibre reinforcement on the mechanical response of loess soil to load. In the present investigation, five groups of loess specimens were prepared with three fibre contents (i.e., 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1% by weight of dry loess) and two different fibre lengths (i.e., 9 mm and 18 mm). The experimental results indicate that the addition of fibre to soil significantly improves the failure stress and shear strength parameters of the loess compared with unreinforced loess specimens. As fibre content increases up to 0.75%, the cohesion of reinforced soil is greatly improved, whereas the amount of increase of the internal friction angle is much less significant. However, the cohesion decreases with the fibre content exceeding 0.75%, as the excessive fibre content may influence the formation of homogeneous mixture, resulting in interfacial mechanical interactions between the fibre surface and soil to be impaired. Loess specimens reinforced with longer fibre exhibited a greater cohesion than those reinforced with shorter fibre, while the internal friction angle is nearly insensitive to the fibre length. As the fibre length increases from 9 to 18 mm, the cohesion increases by 23.2%. In addition, the macro-morphology of fibre-reinforced specimens after triaxial shear tests suggests that an appropriate choice of fibre has the potential to increase soil cracking resistance capacity.


Triaxial compression test Fibre reinforcement Reinforced loess Shear strength 



The authors thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which improve the quality of the manuscript greatly.

Funding information

Financial support of the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 41790440) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2019T120871) are gratefully acknowledged. The support provided by China Scholarship Council (CSC) during a visit of the first author (Lian) to Texas A&M University is sincerely acknowledged.


  1. Ali M (2011) Coconut fibre: a versatile material and its applications in engineering. J Civil Eng Constr Technol 2:189–197Google Scholar
  2. ASTM (2011) Method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils. D 7181, Annual Book of Standards 4:1–11.Google Scholar
  3. Babu GS, Vasudevan A, Haldar S (2008) Numerical simulation of fiber-reinforced sand behavior. Geotext Geomembr 26:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakir N, Abbeche K, Panczer G (2017) Experimental study of the effect of the glass fibers on reducing collapse of collapsible soil. Geomech Eng 12:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekyarova E, Thostenson E, Yu A, Kim H, Gao J, Tang J, Hahn H, Chou T-W, Itkis M, Haddon R (2007) Multiscale carbon nanotube− carbon fiber reinforcement for advanced epoxy composites. Langmuir 23:3970–3974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai S, Xu H, Jiang Q, Yang Y (2013) Novel 3D electrospun scaffolds with fibers oriented randomly and evenly in three dimensions to closely mimic the unique architectures of extracellular matrices in soft tissues: fabrication and mechanism study. Langmuir 29:2311–2318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chakraborty TK, Dasgupta SP (1996) Randomly reinforced fly ash foundation material. In Indian geotechnical conference 1:231–235Google Scholar
  8. Chu J, Leroueil S, Leong W (2003) Unstable behaviour of sand and its implication for slope instability. Can Geotech J 40:873–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Consoli NC, Prietto PD, Ulbrich LA (1998) Influence of fiber and cement addition on behavior of sandy soil. J Geotech Geoenviron 124:1211–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Derbyshire E (2001) Geological hazards in loess terrain, with particular reference to the loess regions of China. Earth Sci Rev 54:231–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. GB/T50123 (1999) Standard for soil test method. Ministry of Construction of People’s Republic of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  12. Hejazi SM, Sheikhzadeh M, Abtahi SM, Zadhoush A (2012) A simple review of soil reinforcement by using natural and synthetic fibers. Constr Build Mater 30:100–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holbery J, Houston D (2006) Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications. Jom 58:80–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang H, Cai Y, Liu J (2010) Engineering properties of soils reinforced by short discrete polypropylene fiber. J Mater Civ Eng 22:1315–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones CJ (2013) Earth reinforcement and soil structures. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaniraj SR, Havanagi VG (2001) Behavior of cement-stabilized fiber-reinforced fly ash-soil mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron 127:574–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar A, Walia BS, Mohan J (2006) Compressive strength of fiber reinforced highly compressible clay. Constr Build Mater 20:1063–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Labuz JF, Zang A (2012) Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:975–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Langroudi AA, Jefferson I (2013) Collapsibility in calcareous clayey loess: a factor of stress-hydraulic history. Int J Geomate Geotech Constr Mater Environ 5:620–626Google Scholar
  20. Li, C., 2005. Mechanical response of fiber-reinforced soil.Google Scholar
  21. Li J, Tang C, Wang D, Pei X, Shi B (2014) Effect of discrete fibre reinforcement on soil tensile strength. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ma Q, Yang Y, Xiao H, Xing W (2018) Studying shear performance of flax fiber-reinforced clay by triaxial test. Adv Civil Eng:2018Google Scholar
  23. Maher M, Ho Y (1994) Mechanical properties of kaolinite/fiber soil composite. J Geotech Eng 120:1381–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maher MH, Gray DH (1990) Static response of sands reinforced with randomly distributed fibers. J Geotech Eng 116:1661–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maher MH, Woods RD (1990) Dynamic response of sand reinforced with randomly distributed fibers. J Geotech Eng 116:1116–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Masoud AA, Aal AKA (2019) Three-dimensional geotechnical modeling of the soils in Riyadh city, KSA. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Michalowski RL, C̆ermák J (2002) Strength anisotropy of fiber-reinforced sand. Comput Geotech 29:279–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Picarelli L (2009) Understanding to predict. In Landslides–Disaster Risk Reduction (pp. 63-88). Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  29. Prabakar J, Sridhar R (2002) Effect of random inclusion of sisal fibre on strength behaviour of soil. Constr Build Mater 16:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ranjan G, Vasan R, Charan H (1996) Probabilistic analysis of randomly distributed fiber-reinforced soil. J Geotech Eng 122:419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Şenol A (2012) Effect of fly ash and polypropylene fibres content on the soft soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shi H, Shao M (2000) Soil and water loss from the Loess Plateau in China. J Arid Environ 45:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shukla S, Sivakugan N, Singh A (2010) Analytical model for fiber-reinforced granular soils under high confining stresses. J Mater Civ Eng 22:935–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shukla SK (2014) Core principles of soil mechanics. Ice Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Shukla SK (2017) Fundamentals of fibre-reinforced soil engineering. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  36. Stevens J (1982) Unified soil classification system. Civil Eng—ASCE 52:61–62Google Scholar
  37. Tang C, Shi B, Gao W, Chen F, Cai Y (2007) Strength and mechanical behavior of short polypropylene fiber reinforced and cement stabilized clayey soil. Geotext Geomembr 25:194–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tanko A, Ijimdiya T, Osinubi K (2018) Effect of inclusion of randomly oriented sisal fibre on some geotechnical properties of lateritic soil. Geotech Geol Eng 36:3203–3209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang Y-X, Guo P-P, Ren W-X, Yuan B-X, Yuan H-P, Zhao Y-L, Shan S-B, Cao P (2017) Laboratory investigation on strength characteristics of expansive soil treated with jute fiber reinforcement. Int J Geomech 17:04017101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu L, Dai F, Tham L, Zhou Y, Wu C (2012) Investigating landslide-related cracks along the edge of two loess platforms in northwest China. Earth Surf Process Landf 37:1023–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang B-H, Weng X-Z, Liu J-Z, Kou Y-N, Jiang L, Li H-L, Yan X-C (2017) Strength characteristics of modified polypropylene fiber and cement-reinforced loess. J Cent South Univ 24:560–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yetimoglu T, Salbas O (2003) A study on shear strength of sands reinforced with randomly distributed discrete fibers. Geotext Geomembr 21:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yuan C, Moscariello M, Cuomo S, Chareyre B (2019) Numerical simulation of wetting-induced collapse in partially saturated granular soils. Granul Matter 21:64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou Jx, Chun yun Z, Jing ming Z, Xiao hui W, Zhou hong L (2002) Landslide disaster in the loess area of China. J For Res 13:157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Western China Mineral Resources and Geological Engineering, College of Geological Engineering and SurveyingChang’an UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Department of Geology and GeophysicsTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations