Failure models of a loess stacked dam: a case study in the Ansai Area (China)
- 65 Downloads
A loess dam is not fully compacted, so there may be a high permeability area in a loess dam. The seepage channel appears inside the dam body, and osmosis damage occurs; these events cause the dam body to be unstable and destroyed. In this paper, the loess dam in the Ansai Area, Yan’an, Shaanxi Province, China, is used as an example monitoring target, and the whole life cycle of the dam is monitored by measuring cracks, liquid level and pore pressure. The timeline regarding multiple instances of damage during the period is used as the basis for subdividing the whole life cycle, and dam damage types are distinguished according to the internal factors and external conditions. By analysing the on-site monitoring data, the dam experienced three obvious types of damage from the onset of monitoring until the dam broke. The triggering factors of the three damage types differ. One factor type is the difference in liquid levels on the two sides of the dam and the seepage channel that is then formed inside the dam. The fine-grained soil in the dam is removed from the seepage channel under the action of hydrodynamic force, the soil at the foot of the dam slope tends to be saturated under the action of osmotic water and the shear strength of the dam slope is reduced. When the soil weight of the upper soil is greater than the shear strength of the soil at the foot of the dam, the first damage type occurs; therefore, it is called “internal erosion damage”. The second type of damage is attributed to the softening of the dam feet under immersion by rainwater, resulting in the dam collapse; it is called “slumping damage”. The third type of damage is due to the infiltration of rainwater through a crack at the top of the dam. The soil at the top of the dam slides along the rainwater intrusion surface, and the width of the dam top is continuously decreased until it completely disappears; therefore, it is called “slippery damage”. On that basis, the loess dam failure modes are proposed due to the difference in hydrodynamic forces on the two sides of the dam and formation of a seepage channel. The fine-grained soil is removed from the seepage channel under the action of hydrodynamic force. The seepage channel is continuously expanded, the soil at the foot of the dam is saturated under the action of seepage water, the soil shear strength is reduced, the dam body becomes unstable and the width of the dam crest is decreased. Under the joint action of infiltration and rainfall, the dam begins the next round of infiltration and erosion and the width of the dam roof continues to decrease. The cycle continues as the width of the dam roof is continuously reduced until overtopping occurs.
KeywordsStacked dam Infiltration Progressive failure
This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41790443 & 41807245), the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2016YFC0802203), the Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (15-KF-05), the Zhejiang Collaborative Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Mountain Geologic Hazards (PCMGH-2017-Z-01) and the Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Depositional Mineralization & Sedimentary Mineral (DMSM2018067).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
- Amnyattalab J, Rezaie H (2018) Study of the effect of seepage through the body of earth dam on its stability by predicting the affecting hydraulic factors using models of Brooks-Corey and van Genuchten (case study of Nazluchay and Shahrchay earth dams). Int J Environ Sci Technol 15(12):2625–2636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen SS, Zhong QM, Cao W (2012) Breach mechanism and numerical simulation for seepage failure of earth-rock dams. Sci China Technol Sci (6):697–703Google Scholar
- Chen SS, Zhong QM, Ren Q (2009) Numerical study on break development due to piping failure for earth-rock dams. Chin J Geotech Eng 31(5):653–657Google Scholar
- Dam Safety Management Center of the Ministry of Water Resources (1995) Dam breach register book of the national reservoirs. Dam Safety Management Center of the Ministry of Water Resources, NanjingGoogle Scholar
- Liang GQ, Zheng MS, Sun BY et al (2003) Analysis model and method of seepage observation data for earth rock-fill dams. J Hydraul Eng 2:83–87Google Scholar
- Liu HJ, Ren J, Yang J et al (2018) The seepage control and three-dimensional numerical analysis of earth-rock dam on deep overburden foundation. J Water Res Water Eng 29(2):219–228Google Scholar
- Li Y, Zhu L, Xuan GX et al (2013) Prediction of failure time of earth-rock dam under condition of overtopping. J Hydroelectr Eng 32(5):174–178Google Scholar
- Luo H, Wu FQ, Chang JY et al (2017) Microstructural constraints on geotechnical properties of Malan Loess: a case study from Zhaojiaan landslide in Shaanxi province, China. Eng Geol 236(26):60–69Google Scholar
- Mei SA, Chen SS, Zhong QM et al (2018) Parametric model for breaching analysis of earth-rock dam. Adv Eng Sci 50(2):60–66Google Scholar
- Qin JH, Wu YX, Gu YC (2018) A seepage pressure prediction model based on the stepwise regression and wavelet neural network for the embankment dam. J Saf Environ 18(5):1670–1674Google Scholar
- Ru NH, Niu YG (2001) Embankment dam incidents and safety of large dam. China Waterpower, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Shi Q, Zhong QM, Lv XQ et al (2018) Numerical model for piping failure of earth-rock dam and its application. J Disaster Prev Mitigation Eng 38(3):511–519Google Scholar
- Wang DX (1995) Reservoir safety design and dam risk. Adv Sci Technol Water Resour 1:17–24Google Scholar
- Xie YJ, Zhu YH, Guo XL (2013) Advances and problems in earth-dam failure research. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 30(4):29–33Google Scholar
- Zhu YH, Liao HZ, Wu ZR (2003) The earth-dam-break model and its development. J Hydroelectr Eng 2:31–38Google Scholar