Advertisement

Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment

, Volume 78, Issue 8, pp 6221–6234 | Cite as

Ground load on tunnels built using new Austrian tunneling method: study of a tunnel passing through highly weathered sandstone

  • Ben-Guo HeEmail author
  • Xi-Wei Zhang
  • Hong-Pu Li
Original Paper
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

The ground load acting on a tunnel is an important issue in tunnel design, especially when the tunnel passes through highly weathered sandstone. A systematic field-monitoring campaign was performed to investigate the ground loads on a tunnel structure, the behavior of the composite support system, and the deformation of the tunnel boundaries. The monitoring results were analyzed and compared with those of various theories, such as the whole-soil column theory and those of Terzaghi, Bierbaumer, Xie Jiaxiu, and Protodyakonov. The ground load on a highway tunnel in highly weathered sandstone does not conform to current theoretical methodologies. It was confirmed that Terzaghi’s theory is suitable for estimating the peak magnitude of the vertical ground load, but differs from the field-monitoring results for ground load distribution profile. To facilitate tunnel design, a potential profile for ground loads is proposed, in which the vertical load component is ‘mountain’-shaped and the horizontal component adopts a ‘folded-line’ pattern. The roof rockbolts are subjected to compression and should be replaced by pipe grouting that is capable of providing enhanced reinforcement and accelerating the construction schedule. The bending moments acting on the lining were found to form a ‘butterfly’ shape. Supplementary finite-element modeling was undertaken to explore the mechanical behavior of the tunnel lining. These results indicated that steel rebar needs to be pre-installed in both the intrados of the lining roof and extrados of the spandrels to improve the lining tensile strength.

Keywords

Highway tunnel Ground load Weathered sandstone Field monitoring Lining 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC0407006) and the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51809038). Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for critical reading of an early version of this paper and for their insightful comments. We thank Kathryn Sole, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

References

  1. Alija S, Torrijo FJ, Quinta-Ferreira M (2014) Study of the unexpected collapse of the Ampurdan tunnel (Spain) using a finite element model. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:451–463.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0534-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ANSYS Inc. (2009) ANSYS user’s manual revision 12.0. Canonburg, Pennsylvania, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6:189–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01239496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bieniawski ZT (1973) Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Trans S Afr Inst Civ Eng 15:335–344Google Scholar
  5. Bierbaumer AH (1913) Die dimensionierung des tunnel manerwerks. Liepzig, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  6. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group (1997) China railway design handbook: tunnel. China Railway Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  7. Clough GW, Duncan JM (1971) Finite element analyses of retaining wall behavior. J Soil Mech Found Div 97:1657–1673Google Scholar
  8. Dalmalm T (2004) Choice of grouting method for jointed hard rock based on sealing time predictions. Dissertation. Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  9. Duddeck H (1979) Zu den berechnungsmethoden für die neue Österreichische tunnelbauweise. Rock Mech 3–27Google Scholar
  10. EN 1992-1-1 (2004) Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  11. Evelyn OJ (2017) Geotechnical engineering design of a tunnel support system - A case study of Karuma (600 MW) hydropower project. Dissertation, University of Cape Town, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  12. Goel RK, Jethwa JL, Dhar BB (1996) Effect of tunnel size on support pressure. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33:749–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gurocak Z (2011) Analyses of stability and support design for a diversion tunnel at the Kapikaya dam site, Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 70:41–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0258-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hatzor YH, He BG, Feng XT (2017) Scaling rockburst hazard using the DDA and GSI methods. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 70:343–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hjálmarsson EH (2011) Tunnel support, use of lattice girders in sedimentary rock. MSc thesis, University of Iceland, IcelandGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:1165–1186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80069-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. International Tunneling Association Working Group on General Approaches to the Design of Tunnels (1988) Guidelines for the design of tunnels. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 3:237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. JTG D70-2004 (2004) Code for design of road tunnel. China Communications Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim J, Kim J, Kim M, Yoo H (2015) Prediction of ground load by performing back analysis using composite support model in concrete lining design. KSCE J Civ Eng 19:1697–1706.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-1514-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolymbas D (1998) Geotechnik – tunnelbau und tunnelmechanik. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Möller S (2006) Tunnel induced settlements and structural forces in linings. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  22. Mosley B, Bungey J, Hulse R (2007) Reinforced concrete design to Eurocode 2, 6th edn. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Myrianthis ML (1975) Ground deformation associated with tunnelling and deep excavations in clay, with particular reference to London clay. Doctoral Dissertation, Durham University, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  24. Rabcewicz L (1964) The new Austrian tunnelling method. Part I. Water Power 16:453–457Google Scholar
  25. Rolf S, Alfred P, Zhang QW (2009) Design in tunnelling, structural design methods for the inner lining. Geomech Tunn 2:359–368.  https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.200900027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simanjuntak TDYF, Marence M, Mynett AE, Schleiss AJ (2014) Pressure tunnels in non-uniform in situ stress conditions. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 42:227–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singh B, Goel RK, Jethwa JL, Dube AK (1997) Support pressure assessment in arched underground openings through poor rock masses. Eng Geol 48:59–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Song YX, Jia XY, Zhu YQ (2007) Study on vertical earth pressure calculation of metro tunnel. Rock Soil Mech 28:2240–2244Google Scholar
  29. Sun XY (1983) Grouted rock bolt used in underground engineering in soft surrounding rock or in highly stressed regions. In: Stephansson O (ed) Proceedings of the international symposium on rock bolting. Abisko, pp 345–352Google Scholar
  30. Szechy K (1970) The art of tunnelling. Akademiai Kaido, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  31. Taromi M, Eftekhari A, Hamidi JK, Hamidi A (2017) A discrepancy between observed and predicted NATM tunnel behaviors and updating: a case study of the Sabzkuh tunnel. Bull Eng Geol Environ 76:713–729.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0862-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Terzaghi K (1946) Introduction to tunnel geology in rock tunneling with steel supports. Youngstown, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. Vu MN, Broere W (2018) Structural design model for tunnels in soft soils: from construction stages to the long-term. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 78:16–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wood DM (2004) Geotechnical modelling. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang DL, Fang Q, Li PF, Wong LNY (2013) Structural responses of secondary lining of high-speed railway tunnel excavated in loess ground. Adv Struct Eng 16:1371–1379.  https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.8.1371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education on Safe Mining of Deep Metal MinesNortheastern UniversityShenyangChina
  2. 2.Department of Geological and Environmental SciencesBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations