Shear velocity-based uncertainty quantification for rock joint shear strength

  • Gaurav TiwariEmail author
  • Gali Madhavi Latha
Original Paper


The shear strength of rock joints is an important property required in order to analyze the stability of rock slopes and tunnels. However, estimation of the shear strength of rock joints for in situ conditions is a complex task due to various influencing factors present in the field. Among these factors, the shear velocity or the shear displacement rate along the rock joints are important parameters which are relatively less studied since their effect is considered to be of second order compared to other factors. However, some recent studies in the literature suggest that shear velocity has a significant influence on the shear strength of rock joints, and hence the shear strength of joints estimated at low shear velocities in laboratories cannot be used under in situ conditions where the possibility of higher shear velocities exist due to the presence of different factors, such as blasting, excavation, and thermal and seismic loads. In this paper, we have addressed these issues in three steps. In the first step, an experimental study on jointed rock specimens is presented to investigate the influence of the displacement rate on the shear strength of rock joints. In the second step, a probabilistic method is developed based on the experimental results and the compiled data from the literature to estimate the in situ shear strength of joints under higher displacement rate conditions, i.e., blasting, excavation, and seismic loads from laboratory-estimated shear strength at the International Society for Rock Mechanics suggested low displacement rates. In the third step, a case study of a Himalayan rock tunnel was used to demonstrate the described approach. It was observed that the shear strength of discontinuities reduced with ncreasing shear velocity and that the rate dependency was higher for low-density rocks and under high confining stress. Further, a considerable effect was observed on the probability of failure of the rock tunnel when the effect of shear velocity was considered in the stability analysis.


Rock discontinuity Shear strength Systematic uncertainty Displacement rate Uncertainty analysis 


  1. Ang AHS, Tang WH (1984) Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 333–400Google Scholar
  2. Atapour H, Moosavi M (2013) Some effects of shearing velocity on the shear stress deformation behaviour of hard–soft artificial material interfaces. Geotech Geol Eng 31(5):1603–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atapour H, Moosavi M (2014) The influence of shearing velocity on shear behavior of artificial joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1745–1761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton NR, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10(1-2):1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byerlee JD, Brace WF (1968) Stick slip, stable sliding, and earthquakes-effect of rock type, pressure, strain rate, and stiffness. J Geophys Res 73:6031–6037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawford AM, Curran JH (1981) The influence of shear velocity on the frictional resistance of rock discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 18:505–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curran JH, Leong PK (1983) Influence of shear velocity on rock joint strength. Proc. of Int. Cong. Rock Mechanics, ISRM, Melbourne, 1: 235-240Google Scholar
  8. Dieterich JH (1972) Time-dependent friction in rocks. J Geophys Res 77(20):3690–3697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dieterich JH (1978) Time-dependent friction and the mechanics of stick–slip. Pure Appl Geophys 116:790–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duzgun HSB, Yucemen MS, Karpuz C (2002) A probabilistic model for the assessment of uncertainties in the shear strength of rock discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:743–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoang TTN, Barbier MG, Sulem J, Marache A, Riss J (2010). Mechanical behavior of natural marble discontinuities. In: Proceedings of conference on Rock Mechanics in Civil and Environmental Engineering-2010, Lausanne, p 215–218Google Scholar
  12. Indraratna B (1990) Development and applications of a synthetic material to simulate soft sedimentary rocks. Geotechnique 40(2):189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Indraratna B, Jayanathan M, Brown ET (2008) Shear strength model for over consolidated clay-infilledidealised rock joints. Geotechnique 58(1):55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ISRM (1981) Rock characterizition, testing and monitoring. In: Brown ET (ed) ISRM suggested methods-1981. Pergamon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Jafari MK, Pellet F, Boulon M, Hosseini K (2004) Experimental study of mechanical behaviour of rock joints under cyclic loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng 37(1):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleepmek M (2014) Effects of shear velocity on fracture shear strength of rocks under confinements. Ph.D. Thesis, 2014, Suranaree University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  17. Lajtai EZ (1991) Time-dependent behaviour of the rock mass. Geotech Geol Eng 9:109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li B, Jiang Y, Wang G (2012) Evaluation of shear velocity dependency of rock fractures by using repeated shear tests. In: Proceeding of 12th ISRM Congress, Harmonising Rock Engineering and the Environment-2012, Beijing, p 699-702Google Scholar
  19. Meemun P (2014) Shear strength testing of rock fractures under constant normal load and constant normal stiffness as affected by displacement rates. Ph.D. Thesis, 2014, Suranaree University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  20. Mehrishal S, Sharifzadeh M, Shahriar K, Song JJ (2016) An experimental study on normal stress and shear rate dependency of basic friction coefficient in dry and wet limestone joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:4607–4629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mirzaghorbanali A, Nemcik J, Aziz N (2014) Effects of shear rate on cyclic loading shear behaviour of rock joints under constant normal stiffness conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(5):1931–1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramamurthy T (2010) Engineering in rocks for slopes foundations and tunnels. Prentice-Hall of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  23. Rocscience (2014) Unwedge version 4.013, underground wedge stability analysis. In: Rocscience Inc. , Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  24. Schneider HJ (1977) The time dependence of friction of rock joints. Bull IAEG 16:235–239Google Scholar
  25. Scholz CH, Engelder JT (1976) The role of asperity indentation and ploughing in rock friction-I. Asperity creep and stick-slip. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 13:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Swolfs JS (1971) Influence of pore-fluid chemistry and temperature on fracture on sandstone under confining pressure. Ph.D. Thesis, College station, Texas A&MGoogle Scholar
  27. Tang ZC, Wong LNY (2016) Influences of normal loading rate and shear velocity on the shear behavior of artificial rock joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(6):2165–2172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tang WH, Yucemen MS, Ang AHS (1976) Probability-based short term design of soil slopes. Can Geotech J 13:201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Teufel LW (1976) The measurement of contact areas and temperature during frictional sliding of Tennessee sandstone, M.Sc. thesis, Texas A&M UniversityGoogle Scholar
  30. Teufel LW, Logan JM (1977) Effect of shortening rate on the real area of contact and temperatures generated during frictional sliding. Pure Appl Geophys 116:840–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang W, Scholz CH (1994) Micromechanics of the velocity and normal stress dependence of rock friction. Pure Appl Geophys 143:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang G, Zhang X, Jiang Y, Wu X, Wang S (2016) Rate-dependent mechanical behavior of rough rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 83:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIITKanpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations