Advertisement

Structural characteristics and its influencing factors of typical loess

  • Huie Chen
  • Yaling Jiang
  • Yue Gao
  • Xiaoqing Yuan
Original Paper
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the influences of water content, calcium carbonate (CaCO3) content, and dry density on the structural characteristics of typical loess, using comprehensive structure potential (CSP) as the structural parameter. Oedometer testing was conducted on undisturbed, saturated, and disturbed loess samples under various conditions of water content, CaCO3 content, and dry density to obtain the deformation data. Based on the collected data, we calculated the CSP and analyzed the structural properties of the samples. The weight of each influencing factor was quantified using a variation coefficient method. To analyze the evolution mechanism of soil structural properties, we determined the microstructure of the samples by scanning electron microscopy studies and mercury intrusion porosimetry. The results showed that the CSP increased with decreasing water content, increasing CaCO3 content, and decreasing dry density. Water content had the greatest effect on the CSP, and CaCO3 content had the least effect. There were two kinds of changes in the structural properties of samples under different conditions: strengthening and weakening. Large pores exerted a significant influence on soil structural properties.

Keywords

Typical loess Structural properties Water content CaCO3 content Dry density Microstructure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41472242 and 41602285), and Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province, China (No. 20180520064JH).

References

  1. Airey DW, Carter JP, Liu MD (2011) Sydney soil model. II: experimental validation. Int J Geomech 11:225–238.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baudet B, Stallebrass S (2004) A constitutive model for structured clays. Geotechnique 54:269–278.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.54.4.269.36354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai J, Dong BY (2011) Micro-structure study on collapsibility loess with SEM method. Appl Mech Mater 52-54:1279–1283.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.52-54.1279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen HE, Jiang YL, Niu CC, Leng GJ, Tian GL (2017) Dynamic characteristics of saturated loess under different confining pressures: a microscopic analysis. Bull Eng Geol Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1101-9
  5. Cheng DW, Luo YS, Chen Q, Guo H (2011) Loess constitutive loss. J Northwest Agric For Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 39:224–234Google Scholar
  6. Deng J, Wang LM, Zhang ZZ, Bing H (2010) Microstructure characteristics and forming environment of late quaternary period loess in the loess plateau of China. Environ Earth Sci 59:1807–1817.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0162-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derbyshire E, Meng X, Wang J, Zhou Z, Li B (1995) Collapsible loess on the loess plateau of China. In: Derbyshire E, Dijkstra, Smalley IJ (eds) Genesis and properties of collapsible soils. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp 267–293.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0097-7_14
  8. Hu RL, Yeung MR, Lee CF, Wang SJ (2001) Mechanical behavior and microstructural variation of loess under dynamic compaction. Eng Geol 59:203–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00074-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koliji A, Vulliet L, Laloui L (2010) Structural characterization of unsaturated aggregated soil. Can Geotech J 47:297–311.  https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li XA, Li LC (2017) Quantification of the pore structures of Malan loess and the effects on loess permeability and environmental significance, Shaanxi Province, China: an experimental study. Environ Earth Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6855-7
  11. Li YR, Zhang WW, Aydin A, Deng XH (2017) Formation of calcareous nodules in loess-paleosol sequences: reviews of existing models with a proposed new “per evapotranspiration model”. J Asian Earth Sci 154:8–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li YR, Mao JR, Xiang XQ, Mo P (2018a) Factors influencing development of cracking–sliding failures of loess across the eastern Huangtu plateau of China. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18:1223–1231.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1223-2018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li YR, Zhang T, Zhang YB, Xu Q (2018b) Geometrical appearance and spatial arrangement of structural blocks of the Malan loess in NW China and the implications for the formation of loess columns. J Asian Earth Sci 158:18–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu MD, Carter JP (1999) Virgin compression of structured soils. Geotechnique 49:43–57.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.1.43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu MD, Carter JP (2003) A structured cam clay model research. Report No. R814. The University of Sydney, SidneyGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu MD, Carter JP, Airey DW (2011) Sydney soil model. I: theoretical formulation. Int J Geomech 11:211–224.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu Z, Liu FY, Ma FL, Wang M, Bai XH, Zheng YL, Yin H, Zhang GP (2016) Collapsibility, composition, and microstructure of loess in China. Can Geotech J 53:673–686.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luo YS, Xie DY, Li P (2005) Main influence factors on structural property changes of unsaturated loess. Bull Soil Water Conserv 25:36–39.Google Scholar
  19. Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  20. Ng CWW, Sadeghi H, Hossen SKB, Chiu CF, Alonso EE, Baghbanrezvan S (2016) Water retention and volumetric characteristics of intact and re-compacted loess. Can Geotech J 53:1258–1269.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osipov BH (1985) The natural features on strength and deformation of clayey soil and rocks. Press House of Geology, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  22. Robin V, Javadi AA, Cuisinier O, Masrouri F (2015) An effective constitutive model for lime treated soils. Comput Geotech 66:189–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shao SJ, Zhou FF, Long JY (2004) Structural properties of loess and its quantitative parameter. Chin J Geotech Eng 26:532–536Google Scholar
  24. Suebsuk J, Horpibulsuk S, Liu MD (2010) Modified structured cam clay: a generalised critical state model for destructured, naturally structured and artificially structured clays. Comput Geotech 37:956–968.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Suebsuk J, Horpibulsuk S, Liu MD (2011) A critical state model for overconsolidated structured clays. Comput Geotech 38:648–658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tan XH, Huang XF, Yao ZH, Xin JP, Wu RZ (2012) Experimental study on structural properties of unsaturated loess based on soil confined compression. Geotech Invest Surv 26:16–21Google Scholar
  27. Tao H, Shao SJ, Li XL, Ma XT (2012) Experimental study of the characteristic parameters and structural behavior of loess. Chin Civil Eng J 45:148–154Google Scholar
  28. Terzaghi K, Peck RB (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang HB, Zhou B, Wu SR, Shi JS, Li B (2011) Characteristic analysis of large-scale loess landslides: a case study in Baoji City of loess plateau of Northwest China. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1829–1837.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-1829-2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang Q, Chen JP, Wang M (1991) A preliminary study on collapsibility of loess-like soil in Changchun. Jilin Geol 3:51–56Google Scholar
  31. Xia J, Han AM (2009) Cyclic variability in microstructure and physio-mechanical properties of the Xiashu loess–palaeosol sequence in Nanjing, China. Eng Geol 104:263–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xie DY, Qi JL (1999) Soil structure characteristics and new approach in research on its quantitative parameter. Chin J Geotech Eng 21:651–656Google Scholar
  33. Zhang MH, Xie YL, Liu BJ (2007) Analysis of compression deformation characteristics of loess during moistening and demoistening process. J Hunan Univ Sci Tech 22:50–55Google Scholar
  34. Zhang XG, Wu H, Fang C, Yi NP (2005) Experimental research on Ca2+ and Mg2+ contributions to structural strength in soil body hydrochemistry environment. Earth Environ 33:58–64Google Scholar
  35. Zourmpakis A, Boardman DI, Rogers CDF, Jefferson I, Gunn DA, Jackson PD, Northmore KJ, Entwisle DC, Nelder LM, Dixon N (2006) Case study of a loess collapse field trial in Kent, SE England. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 39:131–150.  https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/04-046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Construction EngineeringJilin UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations