Advertisement

Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment

, Volume 78, Issue 7, pp 5269–5280 | Cite as

Experimental measurement of permeability evolution in sandstone during hydrostatic compaction and triaxial deformation

  • Jun Yu
  • Weiya Xu
  • Chaojun JiaEmail author
  • Rubin Wang
  • Huanling Wang
Original Paper
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

The permeability of sandstone during hydrostatic compaction and triaxial deformation was measured using a rock triaxial servo-controlled system. The gas permeability was also measured using an integrated permeability and porosity test system to study the difference between gas and water permeability. The experimental results suggested that gas permeability is larger than water permeability by almost one order of magnitude. This phenomenon is due to the slippage effect. The modified permeability is much closer to the water permeability. An empirical exponential relationship can describe the stress-dependent permeability of sandstone, while a power law is suitable to describe the relationship between porosity and effective confining pressure. During triaxial deformation, permeability initially decreases and then begins to increase at an accelerating rate. The peak value of permeability is hysteretic to peak stress. The initial permeability, lowest permeability, peak permeability, and stable value of permeability all decrease with the increase of effective confining pressure. The volumetric strain has a great effect on permeability. The turning point where permeability starts to increase coincides well with the onset of dilatancy.

Keywords

Permeability Hydrostatic compaction Triaxial deformation Strain Effective confining pressure Deviatoric stress 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work presented in this paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 11172090, 51479049, 11272113, 11572110, and 51209075) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant no. BK2012809). They are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Alam AB, Niioka M, Fujii Y, Fukuda D, Kodama J-i (2014) Effects of confining pressure on the permeability of three rock types under compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 65:49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Athy LF (1930) Density, porosity, and compaction of sedimentary rocks. AAPG Bull 14:1–24Google Scholar
  3. Brace WF, Paulding BW Jr, Scholz CH (1966) Dilatancy in the fracture of crystalline rocks. J Geophys Res 71:3939–3953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen L, Liu JF, Wang CP, Liu J, Su R, Wang J (2014) Characterization of damage evolution in granite under compressive stress condition and its effect on permeability. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 71:340–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.07.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Civan F (2010) Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media. Transp Porous Media 82:375–384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-009-9432-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. David C, Wong TF, Zhu WL, Zhang JX (1994) Laboratory measurement of compaction-induced permeability change in porous rocks: implications for the generation and maintenance of pore pressure excess in the crust. Pure Appl Geophys 143:425–456.  https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf00874337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewhurst DN, Aplin AC, Sarda JP, Yang Y (1998) Compaction-driven evolution of porosity and permeability in natural mudstones: an experimental study. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 103:651–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong JJ, Hsu JY, Wu WJ, Shimamoto T, Hung JH, Yeh EC, Wu YH, Sone H (2010) Stress-dependence of the permeability and porosity of sandstone and shale from TCDP Hole-A. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:1141–1157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.06.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duan Z, Davy CA, Agostini F, Jeannin L, Troadec D, Skoczylas F (2014) Gas recovery potential of sandstones from tight gas reservoirs. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 65:75–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans JP, Forster CB, Goddard JV (1997) Permeability of fault-related rocks, and implications for hydraulic structure of fault zones. J Struct Geol 19:1393–1404.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(97)00057-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Florence FA, Rushing J, Newsham KE, Blasingame TA (2007) Improved permeability prediction relations for low permeability sands. In: Proceedings of the Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Technology Symposium, Denver, Colorado, April 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers.  https://doi.org/10.2118/107954-MS
  12. Ghabezloo S, Sulem J, Guédon S, Martineau F (2009) Effective stress law for the permeability of a limestone. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:297–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heid J, McMahon J, Nielsen R, Yuster S (1950) Study of the permeability of rocks to homogeneous fluids. In: Drilling and production practice. American Petroleum Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Heiland J, Raab S (2001) Experimental investigation of the influence of differential stress on permeability of a Lower Permian (Rotliegend) sandstone deformed in the brittle deformation field. Phys Chem Earth A Solid Earth Geodesy 26:33–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1895(01)00019-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoholick JD, Metarko T, Potter PE (1984) Regional variations of porosity and cement: St. Peter and Mount Simon sandstones in Illinois Basin. AAPG Bull 68:753–764Google Scholar
  16. Jones FO, Owens WW (1980) A laboratory study of low-permeability gas sands. J Pet Technol 32:1631–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klinkenberg L (1941) The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases. In: Drilling and production practice. American Petroleum Institute, New York, pp 200–213Google Scholar
  18. Lion M, Skoczylas F, Ledésert B (2004) Determination of the main hydraulic and poro-elastic properties of a limestone from Bourgogne, France. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:915–925.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu Z, Shao J (2017) Strength behavior, creep failure and permeability change of a tight marble under triaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:529–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu ZB, Xie SY, Shao JF, Conil N (2017) Multi-step triaxial compressive creep behaviour and induced gas permeability change of clay-rich rock. Geotechnique 68:281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loosveldt H, Lafhaj Z, Skoczylas F (2002) Experimental study of gas and liquid permeability of a mortar. Cem Concr Res 32:1357–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00793-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitchell TM, Faulkner DR (2008) Experimental measurements of permeability evolution during triaxial compression of initially intact crystalline rocks and implications for fluid flow in fault zones. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 113(B11).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jb005588
  23. Sampath K, Keighin CW (1982) Factors affecting gas slippage in tight sandstones of cretaceous age in the Uinta basin. J Pet Technol 34:2715–2720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmoker JW, Halley RB (1982) Carbonate porosity versus depth: a predictable relation for south Florida. AAPG Bull 66:2561–2570Google Scholar
  25. Shi YL, Wang CY (1988) Generation of high pore pressures in accretionary prisms: inferences from the Barbados subduction complex. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 93:8893–8910.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JB093iB08p08893 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tanikawa W, Shimamoto T (2009) Comparison of Klinkenberg-corrected gas permeability and water permeability in sedimentary rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang SG, Elsworth D, Liu JS (2013) Permeability evolution during progressive deformation of intact coal and implications for instability in underground coal seams. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 58:34–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang HL, Xu WY, Shao JF (2014a) Experimental researches on hydro-mechanical properties of altered rock under confining pressures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:485–493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0439-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang HL, Xu WY, Zuo J (2014b) Compact rock material gas permeability properties. Physica B Condens Matter 449:10–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2014.04.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang L, Liu JF, Pei JL, Xu HN, Bian Y (2015) Mechanical and permeability characteristics of rock under hydro-mechanical coupling conditions. Environ Earth Sci 73:5987–5996.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4190-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang Y, Agostini F, Skoczylas F, Jeannin L, Portier É (2017) Experimental study of the gas permeability and bulk modulus of tight sandstone and changes in its pore structure. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 91:203–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.11.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu YQ, Zhang ZY (1995) Introduction to rock mass hydraulics. Southwest Jiaotong University Press, ChengduGoogle Scholar
  33. Yuan HF, Agostini F, Duan ZB, Skoczylas F, Talandier J (2017) Measurement of Biot’s coefficient for COx argillite using gas pressure technique. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 92:72–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.12.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhu WL, Wong TF (1996) Permeability reduction in a dilating rock: network modeling of damage and tortuosity. Geophys Res Lett 23:3099–3102.  https://doi.org/10.1029/96gl03078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhu WL, Wong TF (1997) The transition from brittle faulting to cataclastic flow: permeability evolution. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 102:3027–3041.  https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb03282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zoback MD, Byerlee JD (1975) Permeability and effective stress: geologic notes. AAPG Bull 59:154–158Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute of Geotechnical EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Coastal Disaster and Defense, Ministry of EducationHohai UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations