Advertisement

Assessment of the impact of case parameters affecting abrasion and brittleness factors in alluviums of line 2 of theTabriz subway, Iran

  • Masoud MostafaeiEmail author
  • Amir Hassan Rezaei Far
  • Ahmad Rastegarnia
Original Paper
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

Drilling long tunnels is usually done in a mechanized form and using tunnel-boring machines (TBM). One of the most important factors in drilling these tunnels is the abrasive effect of soil and rubble on cutting machines and other parts of TBM, which can result in a significant reduction in efficiency of drilling project. Numerous methods have been presented to examine soil and rubble abrasion in drilling sections by researchers. One of the tests in this field is the LCPC test. Different factors can cause abrasion in drilling machines, which have been investigated by researchers. In this study, case factors (moisture, lithology, grain size, and foam of drilling) affecting the abrasion and brittleness coefficient of alluviums of the tunnel route of line 2 of Tabriz Subway from west to east shaft are investigated. To this end, the moisture of 20 samples, lithology of 15 samples, the grain size of 20 samples, and foam effect of 24 samples from the tunnel route of line 2 of Tabriz Subway were prepared. To asses the effect of moisture on abrasion, three types of andesite, sandstone, and conglomerate of the route, examinations were done from dried state to 30% moisture. In two types of sandstone and conglomerate, an increase in moisture led to an increase in abrasion; however, in andesite the abrasion was reduced with a moiture level over 20%; the brittleness coefficient decreased with increased moisture, and in terms of the effect of mineralogy, the conglomerate had the most effect on abrasion. In terms of brittleness, andesite was the most brittle. With regard to the effect of grain size, increased size of grains could lead to more abrasion and less brittleness. The effect of foam on abrasion was such that the abrasion decreased when the foam was moisturized, but excessive levels of foam increasedit.

Keywords

Abrasive Brittleness LCPC test Grain size Moisture Foam 

References

  1. Alavi Gharahbagh E, Rostami J, Palomino AM (2011) New soil abrasion testing method for soft ground tunneling applications. Tunn Undergr Space Technol J 26(5):604–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alavi Gharahbagh E, Rostami J, Talebi K, Ibarra J (2013) Experimental and practical study of impact of soil conditioning on soil abrasion and cutter wear of EPB TBMs. In: RETC Conference June 23–26, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Amoun S, Sharifzadeh M, Shahriar K, Rostami J (2015) Soil abrasiveness for EPB -TBM along Tehran metro tunnel line 7, Iran. World Tunneling Congress, ITAWTC, DubrovnikGoogle Scholar
  4. Amoun S, Sharifzadeh M, Shahriar K, Rostami J, Azali ST (2017) Evaluation of tool wear in EPB tunneling of Tehran metro, line 7 expansion. Tunn Undergr Space Technol J 61:233–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakar MZA, Iqbal MM, Majeed Y, Zahoor MK, Fowell RJ (2014) Reduced propeller speed effects on LCPC rock abrasivity test. Pak J Sci 66(1):25–28Google Scholar
  6. Barzegari G, Uromeihy A, Zhao J (2013) A newly developed soil abrasion testing method for tunnelling using shield machines. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 46(1):63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barzegari G, Uromeihy A, Zhao J (2015) Parametric study of soil abrasivity for predicting wear issue in TBM tunneling projects. Tunn Undergr Space Technol J 48:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Büchi E, Mathier JF, Wyss C (1995) Rock abrasivity — a significant cost factor for mechanical tunneling in loose and hard rock. Tunnel 5:38–44Google Scholar
  9. Dahl F, Bruland A, Jakobsen PD, Nilsen B, Grov E (2012) Classifications of properties influencing the drillability of rocks, based on the NTNU/SINTEF test method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 28:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dullmann J, Alber M, Plinninger RJ (2014) Determining soil abrasiveness by use of index tests versus using intrinsic soil parameters. Geomech Tunn 7(1):87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Er S, Tuğrul A (2016) Estimation of Cerchar abrasivity index of granitic rocks in Turkey by geological properties using regression analysis. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(3):1325–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grødal C, Equey S, Armada S, Espallargas N (2012) Effect of soil and rock composition on the wear process of cutter tool steel used in tunnel boring machines. In: Presented at the Nord Trib Conference, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  13. Gwildis UG, Sass I, Rostami J, Gilbert MB (2010) Soil abrasion effects on TBM tunneling. World Tunneling Congress, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  14. Hashemnejad A, Ghafoori M, Azali ST (2016) Utilizing water, mineralogy and sedimentary properties to predict LCPC abrasivity coefficient. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(2):841–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jakobsen PD, Lohne J (2013) Challenges of methods and approaches for estimating soil abrasivity in soft ground TBM tunneling. Wear 308(1–2):166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jakobsen PD, Bruland A, Dahl F (2013) Review and assessment of the NTNU/SINTEF soil abrasion test (SATTM) for determination of abrasiveness of soil and soft ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 37:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahraman S, Fener M, Käsling H, Thuro K (2016) The influences of textural parameters of grains on the LCPC abrasivity of coarse-grained igneous rocks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 58:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Käsling H, Thuro K (2010) Determining abrasivity of rock and soil in the laboratory. In: Williams AL, Pinches GM, Chin CY, McMorran TJ, Massey CI (Eds.) Geologically active: proceedings of the 11th IAEG Congress. Auckland, New Zealand, 5-10 September 2010. CRC Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Ko TY, Kim TK, Son Y, Jeon S (2016) Effect of geomechanical properties on Cerchar Abrasivity Index (CAI) and its application to TBM tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 57:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Köhler M, Maidl U, Martak L (2011) Abrasiveness and tool wear in shield tunneling in soil. Geomechanics and Tunneling 4:36–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Majeed Y, Bakar MA (2016) Statistical evaluation of CERCHAR Abrasivity index (CAI) measurement methods and dependence on petrographic and mechanical properties of selected rocks of Pakistan. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(3):1341–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mirmehrabi H, Ghafoori M, Lashkaripour GH (2016) Impact of some geological parameters on soil abrasiveness. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(4):1717–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohammadi SD, Firuzi M, Kaljahi EA (2016) Geological–geotechnical risk in the use of EPB-TBM, case study: Tabriz metro. Iran Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(4):1571–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nilsen B, Dahl F, Holzhäuser J, Raleigh P, (2006) Abrasivity testing for rock and soils. Tunnels & Tunnelling International 4:47–49Google Scholar
  25. Normalisation Française P18-579 (1990) Granulats: essai d’abrasivité et de broyabilité. AFNOR Association française de normalisation, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. Oparin VN, Tanaino AS (2015) A new method to test rock abrasiveness based on physico-mechanical and structural properties of rocks. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 7:250–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plinninger R J (2010) Hard rock abrasivity investigation using the Rock Abrasivity index. Proceedings of 16th Congress of the International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3445–3452Google Scholar
  28. Rostami J, Alavi Gharahbagh E, Palomino AM, Mosleh M (2012) Development of soil abrasivity testing for soft ground tunneling using shield machines. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 28:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tarigh Azali S, Moammeri H (2012) EPB-TBM tunneling in abrasive ground, Esfahan Metro Line 1. In: Phienwej, N., Boonyatee, T. (Eds.), ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress (WTC), BangkokGoogle Scholar
  30. Thuro K, Käsling H (2009) Classification of the abrasiveness of soil and rock. Geomech Tunn 2(2):179–188Google Scholar
  31. Thuro K, Singer J, Kasling H, Bauer M (2006) Soil abrasivity assessment using the LCPC testing device. Felsbau 24(6):37–45Google Scholar
  32. Thuro K, Singer J, Kasling H, Bauer M (2011) Determining abrasiveness with the LCPC test. Proceedings of the 1st Canada–US Rock Mechanics Symposium, Vancouver. American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria, VAGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang L, Li H, Zhao X, Zhang Q (2017) Development of a prediction model for the wear evolution of disc cutters on rock TBM cutter head. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 67:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yaralı O, Duru H (2016) Investigation into effect of scratch length and surface condition on Cerchar abrasivity index. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 60:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yaralı O, Yasar E, Bacak G, Ranjith PG (2008) A study of rock abrasivity and tool wear in coal measures rocks. Int J Coal Geol 74:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masoud Mostafaei
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amir Hassan Rezaei Far
    • 1
  • Ahmad Rastegarnia
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringAzarbaijan Shahid Madani UniversityTabrizIran
  2. 2.Department of Geology, Faculty of ScienceFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations