Advertisement

New formulas for predicting liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: model tree approach

  • Yasaman Jafari Avval
  • Ali DerakhshaniEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Liquefaction-induced lateral ground spreading is a serious concern of geotechnical engineers because of its hazardous impact on structures. In recent decades, many researchers have focused on developing models which can be used to estimate the amount of lateral spread displacement. In this study, we propose new predictive models using the M5′ model tree algorithm. The models include single sets of formulas on both free face and sloping ground conditions that differ from traditional approaches in which the two topography conditions are considered separately. We demonstrate that the novel equations outperform the traditional ones in terms of accuracy, simplicity and physical interpretability. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to determine the significance of each governing parameter on the output of the new model. The results are used to develop a formula that can be employed for preliminary estimation of the lateral spreading using the most important input parameters. A simple dimensionless model is also derived with an appropriate degree of accuracy.

Keywords

Lateral spreading Liquefaction M5′ algorithm Soft computing 

References

  1. Akkaş E, Akin L, Çubukçu HE, Artuner H (2015) Application of Decision Tree Algorithm for classification and identification of natural minerals using SEM–EDS. Comput Geosci 80:38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardet J-P, Mace N, Tobita T (1999) Liquefaction-induced ground deformation and failure. A report toPEER/PG&E. Task 4A–Phase 1. Civil Engineering Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. https://geotechpedia.com/Publication/Author/8039/Bardet-J--P-
  3. Bardet J-P, Tobita T, Mace N, Hu J (2002) Regional modeling of liquefaction-induced ground deformation. Earthquake Spectra 18:19–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartlett SF, Youd TL (1995) Empirical prediction of liquefaction-induced lateral spread. J Geotech Eng 121:316–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett SF, Youd TL (1993) Consortium UCUSE prediction of liquefaction-induced ground displacement near bridges. In: National Earthquake Conference: Earthquake Hazard Reduction in the Central and Eastern United States: A Time for Examination and Action. US Central United States Earthquake Consortium (CUSEC), Memphis, pp 575–584Google Scholar
  6. Baziar M, Ghorbani A (2005) Evaluation of lateral spreading using artificial neural networks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baziar M, Nilipour N (2003) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using neural-networks and CPT results. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23:631–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baziar M, Saeedi Azizkandi A (2013) Evaluation of lateral spreading utilizing artificial neural network and genetic programming. Int J Civil Eng Trans B Geotech Eng 11(2):100–111Google Scholar
  9. Cubrinovski M, Robinson K, Taylor M, Hughes M, Orense R (2012) Lateral spreading and its impacts in urban areas in the 2010–2011 Christchurch earthquakes. N Z J Geol Geophys 55:255–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Derakhshani A (2017) Estimating uplift capacity of suction caissons in soft clay: A hybrid computational approach based on model tree and GP Ocean Engineering. 146:1–8  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.09.025
  11. Finn W, Ledbetter R, Wu G (1994) Liquefaction in silty soils: design and analysis. In: Ground failures under seismic conditions. ASCE: 51–76Google Scholar
  12. Ghasemi E, Kalhori H, Bagherpour R, Yagiz S (2016) Model tree approach for predicting uniaxial compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 77:331–343  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0931-1
  13. Goh AT (1994) Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks. J Geotech Eng 120:1467–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goh AT, Zhang W (2014) An improvement to MLR model for predicting liquefaction-induced lateral spread using multivariate adaptive regression splines. Eng Geol 170:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamada M, Sato H, Kawakami TA (1994) Consideration of the mechanism for liquefaction-related large ground displacement. In: Proc 5th US–Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures Against Soil Liquefaction. Technical Report NCEER-94-0026. pp 217–232Google Scholar
  16. Hamada M, Yasuda S, Isoyama R, Emoto K (1986) Study on liquefaction induced permanent ground displacements. Report for the Association for the Development of Earthquake Prediction (ADEP). Japan 87Google Scholar
  17. Hoang N-D, Bui DT (2016) Predicting earthquake-induced soil liquefaction based on a hybridization of kernel fisher discriminant analysis and a least squares support vector machine: a multi-dataset study. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 77:191–204  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0924-0
  18. Javadi AA, Rezania M, Nezhad MM (2006) Evaluation of liquefaction induced lateral displacements using genetic programming. Comput Geotech 33:222–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jung N-C, Popescu I, Kelderman P, Solomatine DP, Price RK (2010) Application of model trees and other machine learning techniques for algal growth prediction in Yongdam reservoir, Republic of Korea. J Hydroinfo 12:262–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kutter BL, Gajan S, Manda KK, Balakrishnan A (2004) Effects of layer thickness and density on settlement and lateral spreading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130:603–614Google Scholar
  21. Quinlan JR (1992) Learning with continuous classes. In: Adams, Sterling (eds) 5th Australian joint conference on artificial intelligence. Singapore. In Proceedings AI'92 Singapore: World Scientic pp 343–348Google Scholar
  22. Rauch AF, Martin J III (2000) EPOLLS model for predicting average displacements on lateral spreads. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 126:360–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rezania M, Faramarzi A, Javadi AA (2011) An evolutionary based approach for assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction and lateral displacement. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24:142–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salimi A, Faradonbeh RS, Monjezi M, Moormann C (2016) TBM performance estimation using a classification and regression tree (CART) technique. Bull Eng Geol Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0969-0
  25. Shamoto Y, Zhang J-M, Tokimatsu K (1998) New charts for predicting large residual post-liquefaction ground deformation. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 17:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharp MK, Dobry R, Abdoun T (2003) Liquefaction centrifuge modeling of sands of different permeability. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129:1083–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shen M, Chen Q, Zhang J, Gong W, Hsein Juang C (2016) Predicting liquefaction probability based on shear wave velocity: an update. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:1199–1214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0880-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tokida K, Matsumoto H, Azuma T, Towhata I (1970) Simplified procedure to estimate lateral ground flow by soil liquefaction. Trans Built Environ 3Google Scholar
  29. Towhata I, Sasaki Y, Tokida K, Matsumoto H, Tamari Y, Yamada K (1992) Prediction of permanent displacement of liquefied ground by means of minimum energy principle. Soils Found 32:97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang WYIH (1997) Inducing model trees for predicting continuous classes. In: Proc European Conference on Machine Learning. University of Economics, Prague, pp 128–137Google Scholar
  31. Wang J, Rahman M (1999) A neural network model for liquefaction-induced horizontal ground displacement. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 18:555–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Witten IH, Frank E (2005) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  33. Xue X, Yang X (2016) Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by support vector machines approaches. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:153–162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0741-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yasuda SH, Nagase HK, Uchida Y (1992) The mechanism and a simplified procedure for the analysis of permanent ground displacement due to liquefaction. Soils Found 32:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Youd TL, Hansen CM, Bartlett SF (2002) Revised multilinear regression equations for prediction of lateral spread displacement. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128:1007–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Youd TL, Perkins DM (1987) Mapping of liquefaction severity index. J Geotech Eng 113:1374–1392Google Scholar
  37. Zhang G, Robertson PK, Brachman R (2004) Estimating liquefaction-induced lateral displacements using the standard penetration test or cone penetration test. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130:861–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang J, Zhao JX (2005) Empirical models for estimating liquefaction-induced lateral spread displacement. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 25:439–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringShahed UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations