Advertisement

Application of the comprehensive forecast system for water-bearing structures in a karst tunnel: a case study

  • Lin Bu
  • Shucai Li
  • Shaoshuai ShiEmail author
  • Lipin Li
  • Yong Zhao
  • Zongqing Zhou
  • Lichao Nie
  • Huaifeng Sun
Original Paper

Abstract

While tunneling in karst terrains, engineers may encounter unpredictable well-developed karst conduits, which frequently lead to water inrush accidents. Geological processes significantly affect the varieties and characteristics of water-bearing structures. Therefore, a comprehensive system for water-bearing structure prediction is first put forward, and then the geological and hydrogeological engineering conditions of the Yuelongmen tunnel in Southwest China are analyzed. To accurately predict the geometric characteristics of water-bearing structures and their spatial relationship with the tunnel face, the transient electromagnetic method (TEM) and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) were comprehensively applied. Then, the induced polarization method (IP) was utilized separately to detect the three-dimensional position and spatial distribution pattern of the water-rich area. According to the comprehensive forecast conclusion, targeted boreholes were drilled, which were selected to verify the water-bearing structure in the survey area. The drilling and detection results matched. Furthermore, the curtain grouting method was adopted for the treatment of the water-rich area. By establishing a comprehensive prediction technology system with the principle of “from qualitative analysis to quantitative identification, from structure locating to the water-bearing structure discrimination, as well as from far and near,” this comprehensive prediction system was successfully put into practice in the karst tunnel in Sichuan; it can play a guiding role in similar projects.

Keywords

Karst tunnel Water-bearing structures Comprehensive prospecting system for water-bearing structures Curtain grouting method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Much of the work presented in this article was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (grant no. 2013CB036000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51609129), State Key Laboratory for GeoMechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (grant no. SKLGDUEK1515), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (grant no. ZR2014EEQ 002), and Shandong Postdoctoral Innovation Project Special Foundation (grant no. 201502025). Useful suggestions and information were given by ChengLan Railway Co., Ltd. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., and China Railway No. 19 Engineering Group Co., Ltd., are also acknowledged. The authors would like to express appreciation to the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped improve the quality of the article.

References

  1. Alija S, Torrijo FJ, Ferreira MQ (2013) Geological engineering problems associatedwith tunnel construction in karst rock masses: the case of Gavarres tunnel (Spain). Eng Geol 157:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alimoradi A, Moradzadeh A, Naderi R, Salehi MZ, Etemadi A (2008) Prediction of geological hazardous zones in front of a tunnel face using TSP-203 and artificial neural networks. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 23:711–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An ZG, Di QY, Wu FQ et al (2012) Geophysical exploration for a long deep tunnel to divert water from the Yangtze to the Yellow River, China. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asprion U, Aigner T (1997) Aquifer architecture analysis using ground-penetrating radar: Triassic and Quaternary examples (S. Germany). Environ Geol 31:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson AK (1995) Applications of ground penetrating radar in assessing some geological hazards: examples of groundwater contamination, faults, cavities. J Appl Geophys 33:177–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doolittle JA, Jenkinson B, Hopkins D, Ulmer M, Tuttle W (2006) Hydropedological investigations with ground-penetrating radar (GPR): estimating water-table depths and local ground-water flow pattern in areas of coarse-textured soils. Geoderma 131:317–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao Y et al (2009) Application of geological radar to geological forecast in karst tunnel. J Shandong Univ (Engineer Science) 39(4):82–86 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  8. Ghorbani A, Cosenza P, Revil A, Zamora M, Schmutz M, Florsch N, Jougnot D (2009) Non-invasive monitoring of water content and textural changes in clayrocks using spectral induced polarization: a laboratory investigation. Appl Clay Sci 43(3):493–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hördt A, Blaschek R, Kemna A, Zisser N (2007) Hydraulic conductivity estimation from induced polarisation data at the field scale—the Krauthausen case history. J Appl Geophys 62(1):33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li SC, Xue YG, Zhang QS et al (2008) Key technology study on comprehensive prediction and early-warning of geological hazards during tunnel construction in high-risk karst areas. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 27:1297–1307 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  11. Li LP, Li SC, Zhang QS (2010a) Study of mechanism of water inrush induced by hydraulic fracturing in karst tunnels. Rock Soil Mech 31:523–528 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  12. Li SC, Li SC, Zhang QS et al (2010b) Predicting geological hazards during tunnel construction. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2:232–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li SC, Liu B, Li SC et al (2011) study of advanced detection for tunnel water-bearing geological structures with induced polarization method. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30:1297-1039 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  14. Li SC, Liu B, Nie LC et al (2015a) Detecting and monitoring of water inrush in tunnels and coal mines using direct current resistivity method: a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 7:469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li SC, Zhou ZQ, Ye ZH et al (2015b) Comprehensive geophysical prediction and treatment measures of karst caves in deep buried tunnel. J Appl Geophys 116:247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li S-C, Song J, Zhang J, et al (2016) A new comprehensive geological prediction method based on constrained inversion and integrated interpretation for water-bearing tunnel structures. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 20:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li S, Liu B et al (2017) An overview of ahead geological prospecting in tunneling. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 63:69–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu B, Li S-S et al (2009) Study of application of complex signal analysis to predicting karst-fractured ground water with GPR. Rock Soil Mech 7:2191–2196Google Scholar
  19. Maury S, Tiwari RK, Balaji S (2016) Joint application of satellite remote sensing, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and resistivity techniques for targeting ground water in fractured Ophiolites of South Andaman Island, India. Environ Earth Sci 75:237–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nie L-C, Li S-C, Liu B et al (2012) An advanced detection study of frequency domain induced polarization method for water-bearing structure of tunnel. Rock Soil Mech 33:1151–1160 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  21. Qu HF, Liu ZG, Zhu HH (2006) Technique of synthetic geologic prediction ahead in tunnel informational construction. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 25:1246–1251Google Scholar
  22. Raiche AP, Jupp D, Rutter H, Vozoff K (1985) The joint use of coincident loop transient electromagnetic and Schlumberger sounding to resolve layered structures. Geophysics 50:1618–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sattel G, Sander BK, Amberg F, Kashiwa T (1996) Tunnel seismic prediction TSP-some case histories. Tunnels Tunn 4:24–30Google Scholar
  24. Schepers R, Rafat G, Gelbke C, Lehmann B (2001) Application of borehole logging, core imaging and tomography to geotechnical exploration. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(6):867–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi S-S, Li S-C, Li L-P et al (2010) Comprehensive geological prediction and management of underground river in karst areas. Rock Soil Mech 33:227–232 (in chinese) Google Scholar
  26. Shi S-S, Li S-C, Li L-P et al (2014) Advance optimized classification and application of surrounding rock based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and tunnel seismic prediction. Automat Constr 37:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun H-F, Li S-C, Su MX, Xue YG (2011a) SEG San Antonio 2011 Annual Meeting 761–765Google Scholar
  28. Sun H-F, Li S-C, Su MX, Xue YG (2011b) Practice of TEM tunnel prediction in Tsingtao subsea tunnel. SEG San Antonio 2011 Annual MeetingGoogle Scholar
  29. Titov K, Kemna A, Tarasov A, Vereecken H (2004) Induced polarization of unsaturated sands determined through time domain measurements. Vadose Zone J 3(4):1160–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Travassosa JM, Menezes PTL (2004) GPR exploration for groundwater in a crystalline rock terrain. J Appl Geophys 55:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vozoff K, Jupp DLB (1975) Joint inversion of geophysical data. Geophys J Int 42:977–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang MS (2004) Hydrologic and geological forecast of tunnel construction in the karst district. Railroad Survey 1:7–9 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  33. Wang JS, Wang L, Cao ZG, Liu ZG, Wang L, Zhu H (2007) Practice on synthetic geological prediction ahead of construction of Xiamen subsea tunnel. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 26:2309–2317 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  34. Wang Z, W-f Cheng, Liu Y, Zhang Y-H (2010) Synthetic advanced forecast technique based on geological logging for tunnel face and ground penetrating radar. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29(3):549-3 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  35. Wang YC, Jing HW, Yu LY, Su H, Luo N (2016) Set pair analysis for risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi: 10.1007/s10064-016-0918-y Google Scholar
  36. Xue GQ, Yan Y, Li X, Di Y (2007) Transient electromagnetic S-inversion in tunnel prediction. Geophys Res Lett 34:L18403–L18408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xue GQ, Qin KZ, Li X et al (2012) Discovery of a large-scale porphyry molybdenum deposit in Tibet through a modified TEM exploration method. J Environ Eng Geoph 17:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang DK, Oldenburg DW (2012) Three-dimensional inversion of airborne time-domain electromagnetic data with applications to a porphyry deposit. Geophysics 77:B23–B34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang GM, Zhang K, Wang LJ, Wu Y (2014) Mechanism of water inrush and quicksand movement induced by a borehole and measures for prevention and remediation. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi: 10.1007/s10064-014-0714-5 Google Scholar
  40. Zhao Y, Li PF, Tian SM (2013) Prevention and treatment technologies of railway tunnel water inrush and mud gushing in China. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5:468–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lin Bu
    • 1
  • Shucai Li
    • 1
  • Shaoshuai Shi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lipin Li
    • 1
  • Yong Zhao
    • 3
  • Zongqing Zhou
    • 1
  • Lichao Nie
    • 1
  • Huaifeng Sun
    • 1
  1. 1.Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research CenterShandong UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground EngineeringChina University of Mining and TechnologyXuzhouChina
  3. 3.Project Design and Approval Center of Ministry of RailwaysBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations