Advertisement

Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment

, Volume 76, Issue 4, pp 1643–1654 | Cite as

Prediction of grout take using rock mass properties

  • A. Rastegar Nia
  • G. R. LashkaripourEmail author
  • M. Ghafoori
Original Paper

Abstract

Seepage through foundation and abutments of a dam can potentially result in waste of the water stored in the dam reservoir, erosion of foundation materials, and development of uplift pressure in the dam foundation which, consequently, threatens the long-term stability of dam. A grouting process, which is carried out based on the results of the Lugeon test, is among the techniques applied for seepage control. In this paper, factors affecting the grouting process were assessed in the Bazoft dam site. Bazoft dam is a hydroelectric supply and double-curvature arch dam with a height of 211 m located in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province of Iran. The bedrock of the dam site consists of Asemari formation (limy marl and marly limestone), in the middle and upper parts of left abutment, and Jahrom formation (limestone and dolomite) in the right abutment, river bed, and lower part of left abutment. As test grouting, two trial grouting programs were applied in the right and left abutment of this dam site. At a first step, using the existing relations and engineering geology reports, Q system, SPI, grouting pressure, joint aperture and grout take were determined for 5 m segments of the trial grouting boreholes. Then, using SPSS software (version 21) the grout take was estimated based on the parameters noted. According to the results, grout take showed good correlation with Q system, grouting pressure and joint aperture. There was no correlation between SPI and grout take. Examination of the necessary assumptions of the model, such as normality, multicollinearity (eigenvalues, condition index, tolerance and VIF), and independence of errors revealed the moderate accuracy of the model obtained.

Keywords

Trial grouting boreholes SPI Q system Grouting pressure Joint aperture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

It is our pleasure to offer our sincere regards to staffs of “Qods Niru Engineering Company” (QNEC) for their cooperation with the work presented in this paper.

References

  1. Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:185–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton N (2006) Rock quality, seismic velocity, attenuation and anisotropy. Taylor & Francis, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6:189–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarck C, Budavari S (1981) Correlation of rock mass classification parameters obtained from borecore and in-situ observation. Eng Geol 17:19–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deere DU (1989) Rock quality designation (RQD) after 20 years. US Army Corps Engineers. Contract Report GL-89-1. Waterways Experimental Station, VicksburgGoogle Scholar
  6. Ewert FK (1997) Permeability, groutability and grouting of rocks related to dam sites; part 4. Groutability and grouting of rock. Dam Eng 8(4):271–325Google Scholar
  7. Foyo A, Sánchez MA, Tomillo C (2005) A proposal for a secondary permeability index obtained from water pressure tests in dam foundations. Eng Geol 77(1):69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Houlsby AC (1990) Construction and design of cement grouting: a guide to grouting in rock foundations, vol 67. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  9. ISRM (1996) International Society for Rock Mechanics—commission on rock grouting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33(8):803–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karagüzel R, Kilic R (2000) the effect of the alteration degree of ophiolitic melange on permeability and grouting. Eng Geol 57(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirlay L (1969) Statistical analysis of fractures (orientation and density). Geol Rundsch 59(1):125–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kutzner C (1996) Grouting of rock and soil. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 271Google Scholar
  13. Qods Niru (2011) Hydro powerhouse Feasibility studies of Bazoft dam site, phase I. Iran Water and Power Resources Development Company (IWPC), Tehran, Iran, p 213Google Scholar
  14. Snow DT (1965) A parallel plate model of fractured permeable media. PhD dissertation, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  15. Sohrabi-Bidar A, Rastegar-Nia A, Zolfaghari A (2016) Estimation of the grout take using empirical relationships (case study: Bakhtiari dam site). Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(2):425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang CP (2004) Estimating cement take and grout efficiency on foundation improvement for Li-Yu-Tan dam. Eng Geol 75(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Rastegar Nia
    • 1
  • G. R. Lashkaripour
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Ghafoori
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geology, Faculty of ScienceFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations