Advertisement

Virtual Reality

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 229–234 | Cite as

A comparative study between a virtual reality heart anatomy system and traditional medical teaching modalities

  • Salsabeel F. M. AlfalahEmail author
  • Jannat F. M. Falah
  • Tasneem Alfalah
  • Mutasem Elfalah
  • Nadia Muhaidat
  • Orwa Falah
S.I. : Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality and Commerce
  • 219 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of using virtual reality (VR) as a medical training tool is to offer additional means to teach students and to improve the quality of medical skills. A novel system was developed to fulfil the requirements of modern medical education and overcome the challenges faced by both students and lecturers in the process of knowledge transfer. A heart three-dimensional model presented in a virtual reality (VR) environment has been implemented in order to facilitate a new educational modality. This paper reports the outcome of a comparative study between traditional medical teaching modalities and virtual reality technology. This study was conducted in the Faculty of Medicine in the University of Jordan. The participants were asked to perform system trials and experiment with the system by navigating through the system interfaces, as well as being exposed to the traditional physical model of the human heart that is currently used in the faculty during practical anatomy sessions. Afterwards, they were asked to provide feedback via a comparative questionnaire. The participants’ replies to the questions regarding the Physical Heart Model and VR heart anatomy system were assessed for reliability using Cronbach’s alpha. The first group’s (Physical Heart Model questions) α value was 0.689. The second group’s (VR heart anatomy system questions) α value was 0.791. Comparing students’ experience results between the traditional method (Physical Heart Model) and the VR heart anatomy system, the mean scores showed a distinct increase in the values. This indicates that the developed system enhanced their experience in anatomy learning and the provided tools improved their understanding of heart anatomy. Results demonstrated the usefulness of the system by showing a higher satisfaction rate for the provided tools regarding structure and visualisation.

Keywords

Medical education Virtual reality Anatomy Heart Comparative study 

References

  1. Alfalah SF, Harrison DK, Charissis V, Evans D (2013a) An investigation of a healthcare management system with the use of multimodal interaction and 3D simulation: a technical note. J Enterp Inf Manag 26:183–197. ISSN: 1741-0398.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39420-1_1
  2. Alfalah SF, Harrison DK, Charissis V (2013b) Gait analysis management and diagnosis in a prototype virtual reality environment. In: Virtual, augmented and mixed reality. Systems and applications, Springer, Berlin, pp 3–11. ISSN: 0302-9743.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39420-1_1
  3. Charissis V, Papanastasiou S (2010) Human–machine collaboration through vehicle head up display interface. Cognit Technol Work 12(1):41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cronbach LJ, Furby L (1970) How should we measure “change”- or should we? Psychol Bull 74:68–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engum SA, Jeffries P, Fisher L (2003) Intravenous catheter training system: computer-based education versus traditional learning methods. Am J Surg 186(1):67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Falah J, Harrison DK, Wood B, Evans D (2012) The characterisation of an IT system to reduce the gap between information technology and medical education. In: International conference on manufacturing research (ICMR). vol. 2, pp 360–365. ISBN: 9781905866601Google Scholar
  8. Falah J, Harrison DK, Charissis V, Wood BM (2013) The characterisation of a virtual reality system to improve the quality and to reduce the gap between information technology and medical education. In: Virtual, augmented and mixed reality. systems and applications, vol 2. Springer, Berlin. pp 122–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39420-1_14
  9. Falah J, Khan S, Alfalah T, Alfalah SFM, Chan W, Harrison DK, Charissis V (2014) Virtual reality medical training system for anatomy education. In: Science and information conference (SAI). IEEE. pp 752–758.  https://doi.org/10.1109/sai.2014.6918271
  10. Falah J, Charissis V, Khan S, Chan W, Alfalah SF, Harrison DK (2015) Development and evaluation of virtual reality medical training system for anatomy education. In: Chen L, Kapoor S, Bhatia R (eds) Intelligent systems in science and information. Springer, Berlin, pp 369–383.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14654-6_23 Google Scholar
  11. Gallo L, Minutolo A, De Pietro G (2010) A user interface for VR-ready 3D medical imaging by off-the-shelf input devices. Comput Biol Med 40(3):350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Onyesolu M (2009) Virtual reality laboratories: an ideal solution to the problems facing laboratory setup and management. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science, San Francisco, USA. 1. ISBN: 978-988-17012-6-8Google Scholar
  13. Peterson D, Robertson C (2013) Utilizing virtual reality in teaching and training: progress toward virtual surgical simulations. In: INTED2013 proceedings. pp 3285–3291Google Scholar
  14. Sakellariou S, Ward BM, Charissis V, Chanock D, Anderson P (2009) Design and implementation of augmented reality environment for complex anatomy training: inguinal canal case study. In: Virtual and mixed reality, Springer, Berlin, pp 605–614, 0302–9743.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02771-0_67
  15. Sakellariou S, Charissis V, Grant S, Turner J, Kelly D, Christomanos C (2011) Virtual reality as knowledge enhancement tool for musculoskeletal pathology. In: Virtual and mixed reality-systems and applications, Springer, Berlin, pp 54–63. ISSN: 0302-9743.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22024-1_7
  16. Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2012) Research methods for business student, Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate Harlow, England, pp 430–436. ISBN: 9780273750758Google Scholar
  17. Vozenilek J, Huff JS, Reznek M, Gordon JA (2004) See one, do one, teach one: advanced technology in medical education. Acad Emerg Med 11(11):1149–1154.  https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Information SystemsThe University of JordanAmmanJordan
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science Al-Balqa` Applied UniversityAmmanJordan
  3. 3.Department of Business AdministrationApplied Science UniversityAmmanJordan
  4. 4.Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of MedicineThe University of JordanAmmanJordan
  5. 5.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of MedicineThe University of JordanAmmanJordan
  6. 6.Department of Vascular SurgeryThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations