Advertisement

Hydrogeology Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 2303–2304 | Cite as

Correction: Solute transport performance analysis of equivalent apertures in a single undisturbed basaltic fracture

  • Murilo LucasEmail author
  • Gabriel Dias Cantareira
  • Edson Wendland
Correction
  • 187 Downloads

Erratum: Analyse de la performance des ouvertures équivalentes sur le transport de soluté dans une fracture basaltique unique et intacte

Erratum: Análisis del comportamiento del transporte de solutos de aberturas equivalentes en una sola fractura basáltica no perturbada

勘误: 单条未扰动玄武岩裂缝中等效开度的溶质运移效果分析

Erratum: Análise de desempenho do transporte de soluto de aberturas equivalentes em uma única fratura basáltica indeformada

Correction: Hydrogeol J

 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-01960-x

There was an error during production which resulted in the alpha symbol (α) being omitted from the article in some locations. Presented here are the correct Table 2 and text.
Table 2

Results of longitudinal dispersivity and statistical performance of the transport simulations

Experiment

Longitudinal dispersivity (cm)

MAE (mg L-1)

d r c

α L-m a

α L-h a

α L-l a

MAEmb

MAEhb

MAElb

d r-m c

d r-h c

d r-l c

1

0.4

8.2

10.0

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.94

0.54

0.48

2

0.1

10.0

10.0

0.15

0.17

0.19

0.93

0.47

0.43

3

0.1

8.7

10.0

0.08

0.10

0.11

0.79

0.57

0.54

4

0.1

10.0

10.0

0.10

0.13

0.14

0.79

0.55

0.51

aαL-m, αL-h and αL-l = longitudinal dispersivity based on am, ah and al, respectively.

bMAEm, MAEh and MAEl = Mean absolute error of simulated concentration based on am, ah and al, respectively.

cdr-m, dr-h and dr-l = index of agreement based on am, ah and al, respectively.

Effect of equivalent apetures on solute transport simulation

The solute transport simulation was performed using an analytical solution of the ADE (Eq. 10), where longitudinal dispersivity (αL) was considered as the adjustable parameter to fit the breakthrough curves. Mean flow velocity was chosen according to the calculated equivalent apertures (Table 1). The results demonstrated that fitted αL values based on Vm did not change abruptly (i.e. same order of magnitude) varying from 0.4 cm in the first experiment (Q = 3.0 mL h-1) to 0.1 cm in the other three experiments (Table 2). The αL values based on Vh and Vl converged to 10 cm in most experiments. Overall, αL values tend to get closer to each other, considering the same equivalent aperture even though Q increases (Table 2).

The original article has been corrected.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Murilo Lucas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gabriel Dias Cantareira
    • 2
  • Edson Wendland
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringFederal University of Technology – ParanáPato BrancoBrazil
  2. 2.Institute of Mathematics and Computer SciencesUniversity of São PauloSão CarlosBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Hydraulics and Sanitary EngineeringUniversity of São PauloSão CarlosBrazil

Personalised recommendations