Advertisement

Hernia

pp 1–7 | Cite as

Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of inguinal hernia using “two-hooked” core needle apparatus in children

  • H. Yonggang
  • Q. Changfu
  • W. Ping
  • Z. Fangjie
  • W. Hao
  • G. Zicheng
  • G. Guodong
  • Y. JingEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of inguinal hernia using “two-hooked” core needle apparatus in children.

Methods

This study was conducted at Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine between January 2016 and June 2018. Five hundred and eighteen patients under the age of 12 years with inguinal hernias were subjected to single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SPLPEC) using non-absorbable suture by “two-hooked” core needle apparatus. Description of the technique is as follows: Under general anesthesia, a 0.5–0.8 cm trans-umbilical skin incision was done for insertion of a 0.5 cm port. A “two-hooked” core needle apparatus was used for insertion of a non-absorbable suture around internal ring. The suture knot was tied extracorporeally.

Results

Among 518 child patients with inguinal hernias, there were 406 males and 112 females with a mean age of 4.6 ± 3.5 years. One hundred and six cases were subjected to bilateral surgery including 91 cases of contralateral patent processus vaginalis (PPV). Three cases converted to open surgery and additional 0.5 cm port was done in five cases. The mean operative time was 13.2 ± 3.5 min for unilateral hernia repair and 16.9 ± 4.6 min for bilateral cases. All patients achieved full recovery without complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), testicular atrophy, or iatrogenic ascent of the testis. At the mean follow-up time of 18.72 ± 5.27 months, two cases had recurrences (0.39%) and one case had postoperative hydrocele (0.19%).

Conclusion

SPLPEC of inguinal hernia using “two-hooked” core needle apparatus in children is a feasible and reliable minimal invasive procedure. It has the advantages of short operating time, low complication rate, low recurrence rate and better cosmetic result.

Keywords

Pediatric inguinal hernia Single-port laparoscopic surgery Minimally invasive surgery Patent processus vaginalis 

Notes

Author contributions

HY and QC contributed almost the same and mainly do the writing of this paper, language editing and reviewing of related literature together. So these two authors are co-first authors. YJ and GZ collected the data and did the statistical analysis. W Ping and GG are the superior directors who were referred to when managing clinical cases. HY, ZF and WH did most of the operations and did the follow-up.

Funding

This study was funded by Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Youth Programme Code: QML20170307.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

YH, CQ, PW, FZ, GW, ZG, GG, and JY declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by Institutional Review Board approval and the study including human participants had been performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consents were obtained from all patients’ parents or guardians.

References

  1. 1.
    El-Gohary MA (1997) Laparoscopic ligation of inguinal hernia in girls. Pediatr Endosurg Innov Tech 1:185–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clarke S (2010) Pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele: An evidence-based review in the era of minimal access surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(3):305–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan KL, Hui WC, Tam PK (2005) Prospective randomized single-center, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair of pediatric inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 19:927–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takehara H, Yakabe S, Kameoka K (2006) Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia in children: clinical outcome of 972 repairs done in 3 pediatric surgical institutions. J Pediatr Surg 41:1999–2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harrison MR, Lee H, Albanese CT et al (2005) Subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation (SEAL) of the internal ring for repair of inguinal hernias in children: a novel technique. J Pediatr Surg 40:1177–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozgediz D, Roayaie K, Lee H et al (2007) Subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation (SEAL) of the internal ring for repair of inguinal hernias in children: report of a new technique and early results. Surg Endosc 21:1327–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patkowski D, Czernik J, Chrzan R et al (2006) Percutaneous internal ring suturing: a simple minimally invasive technique for inguinal hernia repair in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:513–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bharathi RS, Arora M, Baskaran V (2008) How we “SEAL” internal ring in pediatric inguinal hernias. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:192–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang YT (2010) Technical refinements in single-port laparoscopic surgery of inguinal hernia in infants and children. Diagn Ther Endosc 392847:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/392847 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li B, Nie X, Xie H, Gong D (2012) Modified single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy for pediatric inguinal hernias: based on 1,107 cases in China. Surg Endosc 26:3663–3668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McClain L, Streck C, Lesher A, Cina R, Hebra A (2015) Laparoscopic needle-assisted inguinal hernia repair in 495 children. Surg Endosc 29:781–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li S, Liu X, Wong KKY, Liu L, Li Y (2018) Single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy using a two-hooked cannula device with hydrodissection. J Pediatr Surg 1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.08.009. pii: S0022-3468(18)30515-3.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shalaby R, Ismail M, Shehata S et al (2015) Shalaby technique for efficient single incision laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair. J Pediatr Surg 50(11):1995–2000.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ismail M, Shalaby R (2014) Single instrument intracorporeal knot tying during single port laparoscopic hernia repair in children: a new simplified technique. J Pediatr Surg 49(6):1044–1048.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.02.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davies DA, Rideout DA, Clarke SA (2017) The international pediatric endosurgery group evidence-based guideline on minimal access approaches to the operative management of inguinal hernia in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 31.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0453
  16. 16.
    Zhang Y, Chao M, Zhang X, Wang Z, Fan D, Zhang K, Cai Y, Liang C (2018) Does the laparoscopic treatment of paediatric hydroceles represent a better alternative to the traditional open repair technique? A retrospective study of 1332 surgeries performed at two centers in China. Hernia 22(4):661–669.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1715-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Esposito C, St Peter SD, Escolino M, Juang D, Settimi A, Holcomb GW (2014) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in pediatric patients: A systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:811–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Celebi S, Uysal AI, Inal FY, Yildiz A (2014) A single-blinded, randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open bilateral hernia repair in boys. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:117–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kokorowski PJ, Wang HH, Routh JC, Hubert KC, Nelson CP (2014) Evaluation of the contralateral inguinal ring in clinically unilateral inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 18:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (2010) IPEG Guidelines for Inguinal Hernia and Hydrocele. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(2):x–xiv.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2010.9998 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu W, Wu R, Du G (2014) Single-port laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair of paediatric inguinal hernias and hydroceles by using modified Kirschner pin: a novel technique. Hernia 18(3):345–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li S et al (2015) A modified approach for inguinal hernias in children: hybrid single-incision laparoscopic intraperitoneal ligation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 25(8):689–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yilmaz E, Afsarlar CE, Senel E, Cavusoglu YH, Karaman I, Karaman A, Ozguner IF (2015) A novel technique for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure assisted by an optical forceps. Pediatr Surg Int 31(7):639–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s HospitalZhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations