Ventral hernia repair outcomes predicted by a 5-item modified frailty index using NSQIP variables
- 185 Downloads
Frailty is a decrease in physiologic reserve that is separate from the normal aging process. Previously, an 11-item modified frailty index (mFI) using NSQIP variables predicted outcomes for surgical patients. We aim to validate a condensed 5-item mFI in ventral hernia patients and determine outcomes and the relative impact of each frailty variable.
The NSQIP database was queried from 2011 to 2016 for patients undergoing VHR. Spearman’s rho correlation was used to determine the degree of correlation between 11-item and 5-item mFI raw frailty scores. Chi squared testing was used to determine odds ratios (95% CI) for accumulating frailty variables in both indices with regard to complications vs a baseline of zero variables present on the 11-item scale. Complications were defined by the Clavien–Dindo (CD) classification. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on each frailty variable to determine their relative weighted impacts on outcomes.
97,905 patients (99.45%) had all five frailty variables recorded. Only 11,549 patients (11.73%) had all variables from the 11-item mFI. No difference existed between groups for the five mutually shared frailty variables, BMI, emergent vs non-emergent procedures, operative time, or operative approach. For accumulating variables in both indices, the 5-item mFI predicts incidence of any complications, major complications, and discharge not to home similarly to the 11-item mFI. The most significantly weighted variable for complications and discharge not to home is functional status.
A 5-item mFI accurately predicts outcomes similar to the validated 11-item mFI and captures more patients for analysis.
KeywordsFrailty Ventral hernia NSQIP Modified frailty index Outcomes
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interests or other disclosures.
Approval from the institutional review board was not required for this study.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors given its retrospective nature.
Given the retrospective nature of this review, formal consent is not required.
- 3.NSQIP (2018) NSQIP query for ventral hernia repair in the United States 2011–2016. Query published 2018Google Scholar
- 14.Rogmark P, Petersson U, Bringman S et al (2013) Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: a randomized multicenter controlled trial: the ProLOVE (prospective randomized trial on open versus laparoscopic operation of ventral eventrations) trial. Ann Surg 258(1):37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Albright EL, Davenport DL, Roth JS (2012) Preoperative functional health status impacts outcomes after ventral hernia repair. Am Surg 78(2):230–234Google Scholar
- 18.Bieniek J, Wilczyński K, Szewieczek J (2016) Fried frailty phenotype assessment components as applied to geriatric inpatients. Clin Intervent Aging 11:453–459Google Scholar