Long-term outcomes after prophylactic use of onlay mesh in midline laparotomy
- 70 Downloads
The prevalence of incisional hernias (IHs) is still high after midline laparotomy (ML). There is an increasing body of evidence that prophylactic mesh placement (PMP) can be safe and efficient in the short-term outcomes, but there still are some concerns about the potential long-term complications of these meshes. This study describes our long-term PMP experience.
Observational and prospective study including all patients undergoing the use of prophylactic onlay large-pore polypropylene meshes for the closure of ML since 2008 to 2014. Outcome measures included demographics, perioperative details, wound complications, recurrences, reoperations and chronic complications.
A cohort of 172 patients was analysed: 75% elective surgery, 25% emergency cases. Mean age was 68 years with mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.6 kg/m2. Wound classification: 6.4% clean; 85% clean-contaminated; 1.2% contaminated and 8.1% dirty. Follow-up of patients was up to 8 years (mean: 5 ± 1.6). Two meshes were removed due to chronic infection in first six postoperative months. Of the 13 patients (9.02%) who developed IH, 5 of them have been reoperated for IH repair without any difficulty related to previous mesh. During follow-up, 8 patients have been reoperated for other reasons and the integrity of abdominal wall was also checked. After the comparative study, higher BMI and emergency surgery were still risk factors for IH despite PMP.
In our setting, the use of polypropylene prophylactic meshes in MLs is safe, efficient and durable.
KeywordsIncisional hernia Prophylactic mesh Midline laparotomy Polypropylene mesh
American Society of Anesthesiologists
Body mass index
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Computed tomographic scan
Prophylactic mesh placement
Quality of life
Randomized controlled trial
Statistical package for the social sciences
Surgical site infection
We would like to thank Dr. Tobby Hammond, from Broomfield Hospital, Mid Essex Hospital Trust, UK, for his careful and extensive revision of the English grammar and composition of this manuscript.
MAGU, LAB and JLM conceived of the presented idea. MAGU, CS and DM designed the study. CS, EJ, CJ and PL collected data from the registry and AR verified the analytical methods. MAGU and EG encouraged CS, DM and EJ to investigate and supervised the findings of this work. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
This study was not funded.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Dr. San Miguel reports no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. Dr. Melero reports no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. Dra. Jiménez E reports no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. Dra. López reports no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. Dr. Robin reports no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. Dr. Blázquez reports having received lecture fees from WL Gore & Associates. Dr. López-Monclús reports having received grants from Gore. Dr. González reports no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. Dra. Jiménez C reports no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. Dr. García-Ureña reports having received lecture fees from Covidien and B Braun, grants from Gore and fees for development of educational presentations from Gore and Medtronic.
Approval from the institutional review board was not required for this study.
Human and animal rights
The study including human participants has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to all surgical procedures.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 141266 KB)
- 3.Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik REGJM, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW et al (2017) Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 390(10094):567–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.STROBE statement (2017) https://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=strobe-home. Accesed 30 Oct 2017
- 32.Gurusamy KS, Allen VB (2013) Wound drains after incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17(12):CD005570Google Scholar
- 34.Plencner M, East B, Tonar Z, Otáhal M, Prosecká E, Rampichová M et al (2014) Abdominal closure reinforcement by using polypropylene mesh functionalized with poly-ε-caprolactone nanofibers and growth factors for prevention of incisional hernia formation. Int J Nanomedicine 9:3263–3277CrossRefGoogle Scholar