Advertisement

Ecosystems

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Cumulative Effects of Disturbances on Soil Nutrients: Predominance of Antagonistic Short-Term Responses to the Salvage Logging of Insect-Killed Stands

  • Christine Martineau
  • Julien Beguin
  • Armand Séguin
  • David ParéEmail author
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Nutrient cycling generally recovers rapidly following disturbance in forest ecosystems. Concerns have been expressed that the resilience of this function may be altered by enhanced disturbance frequency, and especially by the use of salvage logging. A sudden hemlock looper (Lambdina fiscellaria) outbreak in a boreal forest leading to tree mortality in discrete patches allowed us to evaluate the impact of disturbance type (logging vs insect defoliation) as well as the cumulative effects of both disturbances (that is, salvage logging of defoliated sites) on soil nutrients, providing a rare opportunity to test for interactions between these two disturbances. We assessed, within 2–3 years following treatments, whether both individual disturbances had distinct effects on soils properties and whether their cumulative effects were either additive, synergistic or antagonistic. Defoliation generally increased the soil nutrient concentrations, especially of soluble nitrogen forms, when compared to the undisturbed controls. The spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrient concentrations was also much greater in defoliated stands than in the other treatments. Logging alone had an effect that was less variable and generally of lower amplitude than defoliation. Contrary to what was expected, salvage logging led to soil properties that were more similar to those of undisturbed controls, indicating that antagonistic interactions occurred. Our results showed that, under the conditions of this study, salvage logging could reduce the potential for soil nutrient leaching and lead to more homogenous soil conditions. These results bring new light on the effect of cumulative disturbances and could be useful to guide post-disturbance forest management decisions.

Keywords

hemlock looper insect outbreak insect defoliation cumulative disturbances salvage logging resilience soil carbon soil nitrogen soil nutrients 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Sébastien Dagnault for his contributions. The GIS analysis that he performed as well as the validation that he conducted in the field was very useful to the set-up of the experimental design. We thank Sébastien Dagnault and Fanny Michaud for conducting field and laboratory work and Serge Rousseau for conducting the laboratory analyses. We also wish to thank Sanatan Das Gupta of Northern Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, for insightful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10021_2019_432_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14458 kb)

References

  1. Achat DL, Fortin M, Landmann G, Ringeval B, Augusto L. 2015. Forest soil carbon is threatened by intensive biomass harvesting. Scientific Reports 5:15991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26:32–46.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ. 2006. Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62:245–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke K. 2008. PERMANOVA + for primer: Guide to software and statistical methods. Plymouth, UK: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson MJ, Walsh DCI. 2013. PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: What null hypothesis are you testing? Ecological Monographs 83:557–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. l-M-Arnold A, Grüning M, Simon J, Reinhardt A-B, Lamersdorf N, Thies C. 2016. Forest defoliator pests alter carbon and nitrogen cycles. Royal Society Open Science 3:160361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Attiwill PM. 1994. The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management. Forest Ecology and Management 63:247–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Béland J-M, Bauce É, Cloutier C, Berthiaume R, Hébert C. 2019. Early responses of bark and wood boring beetles to an outbreak of the hemlock looper Lambdina fiscellaria (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in a boreal balsam fir forest of North America. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 0.  https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12347. Last Accessed 24/07/2019
  9. Bergeron Y, Cyr D, Drever CR, Flannigan M, Gauthier S, Kneeshaw D, Lauzon È, Leduc A, Goff HL, Lesieur D, Logan K. 2006. Past, current, and future fire frequencies in Quebec’s commercial forests: implications for the cumulative effects of harvesting and fire on age-class structure and natural disturbance-based management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:2737–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergeron Y, Fenton NJ. 2012. Boreal forests of eastern Canada revisited: old growth, nonfire disturbances, forest succession, and biodiversity. Botany 90:509–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brockerhoff EG, Liebhold AM, Jactel H. 2006. The ecology of forest insect invasions and advances in their management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:263–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buma B, Wessman CA. 2011. Disturbance interactions can impact resilience mechanisms of forests. Ecosphere 2:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cabrera ML, Beare MH. 1993. Alkaline persulfate oxidation for determining total nitrogen in microbial biomass extracts. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57:1007–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carter M, Gregorich E. 2007. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 2nd edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  15. Certini G. 2005. Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia 143:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke N, Gundersen P, Jönsson-Belyazid U, Kjønaas OJ, Persson T, Sigurdsson BD, Stupak I, Vesterdal L. 2015. Influence of different tree-harvesting intensities on forest soil carbon stocks in boreal and northern temperate forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 351:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collins BJ, Rhoades CC, Hubbard RM, Battaglia MA. 2011. Tree regeneration and future stand development after bark beetle infestation and harvesting in Colorado lodgepole pine stands. Forest Ecology and Management 261:2168–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coulombe D, Sirois L, Paré D. 2016. Effect of harvest gap formation and thinning on soil nitrogen cycling at the boreal–temperate interface. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 47:308–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crain CM, Kroeker K, Halpern BS. 2008. Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. Ecology Letters 11:1304–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Development Core Team R. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria http://www.R-project.org/
  21. FAO—IUSS Working Group WRB. 2015. World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports 106.Google Scholar
  22. Fornwalt PJ, Rhoades CC, Hubbard RM, Harris RL, Faist AM, Bowman WD. 2018. Short-term understory plant community responses to salvage logging in beetle-affected lodgepole pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management 409:84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franklin JF, Spies TA, Pelt RV, Carey AB, Thornburgh DA, Berg DR, Lindenmayer DB, Harmon ME, Keeton WS, Shaw DC, Bible K, Chen J. 2002. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. Forest Ecology and Management 155:399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fraterrigo JM, Rusak JA. 2008. Disturbance-driven changes in the variability of ecological patterns and processes. Ecology Letters 11:756–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Griffin JM, Simard M, Turner MG. 2013. Salvage harvest effects on advance tree regeneration, soil nitrogen, and fuels following mountain pine beetle outbreak in lodgepole pine. Forest Ecology and Management 291:228–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grüning MM, Simon J, Rennenberg H, l-M-Arnold A. 2017. Defoliating insect mass outbreak affects soil N fluxes and tree N nutrition in Scots Pine forests. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hébert C, Jobin L. 2001. The hemlock looper. https://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications?id=19572
  28. Houle D, Duchesne L, Boutin R. 2009. Effects of a spruce budworm outbreak on element export below the rooting zone: a case study for a balsam fir forest. Annals of Forest Science 66:707–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hume AM, Chen HYH, Taylor AR. 2018. Intensive forest harvesting increases susceptibility of northern forest soils to carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus loss. Journal of Applied Ecology 55:246–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. James J, Harrison R. 2016. The Effect of Harvest on Forest Soil Carbon: A Meta-Analysis. Forests 7.Google Scholar
  31. Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F, Johnson DW, Minkkinen K, Byrne KA. 2007. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137:253–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson EA. 1992. Fire and vegetation dynamics: studies from the North American boreal forest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/fire-and-vegetation-dynamics/C709E7784F05A02305FACC7F4DE4646F
  33. Kneeshaw D, Gauthier S. 2003. Old growth in the boreal forest: A dynamic perspective at the stand and landscape level. Environmental Reviews 11:S99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. le Mellec A, Gerold G, Michalzik B. 2011. Insect herbivory, organic matter deposition and effects on belowground organic matter fluxes in a central European oak forest. Plant and Soil 342:393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leverkus AB, Lindenmayer DB, Thorn S, Gustafsson L. 2018a. Salvage logging in the world’s forests: Interactions between natural disturbance and logging need recognition. Global Ecology and Biogeography 27:1140–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leverkus AB, Rey Benayas JM, Castro J, Boucher D, Brewer S, Collins BM, Donato D, Fraver S, Kishchuk BE, Lee E-J, Lindenmayer DB, Lingua E, Macdonald E, Marzano R, Rhoades CC, Royo A, Thorn S, Wagenbrenner JW, Waldron K, Wohlgemuth T, Gustafsson L. 2018b. Salvage logging effects on regulating and supporting ecosystem services — a systematic map. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 48:983–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li Q, Allen HL, Wilson CA. 2003. Nitrogen mineralization dynamics following the establishment of a loblolly pine plantation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:364–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindenmayer DB, Foster DR, Franklin JF, Hunter ML, Noss RF, Schmiegelow FA, Perry D. 2004. Salvage harvesting policies after natural disturbance. Science 303:1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lovett GM, Canham CD, Arthur MA, Weathers KC, Fitzhugh RD. 2006. Forest ecosystem responses to exotic pests and pathogens in Eastern North America. BioScience 56:395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lovett GM, Christenson LM, Groffman PM, Jones CG, Hart JE, Mitchell MJ. 2002. Insect defoliation and nitrogen cycling in forests laboratory, plot, and watershed studies indicate that most of the nitrogen released from forest foliage as a result of defoliation by insects is redistributed within the ecosystem, whereas only a small fraction of nitrogen is lost by leaching. BioScience 52:335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mattson LR, Coop JD, Battaglia MA, Cheng AS, Sibold JS, Viner S. 2019. Post-spruce beetle timber salvage drives short-term surface fuel increases and understory vegetation shifts. Forest Ecology and Management 437:348–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maynard DG, Paré D, Thiffault E, Lafleur B, Hogg KE, Kishchuk B. 2014. How do natural disturbances and human activities affect soils and tree nutrition and growth in the Canadian boreal forest? Environmental Reviews 22:161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McArdle BH, Anderson MJ. 2001. Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mobley ML, Yang Y, Yanai RD, Nelson KA, Bacon AR, Heine PR, Richter DD. 2019. How to estimate statistically detectable trends in a time series: a study of soil carbon and nutrient concentrations at the Calhoun LTSE. Soil Science Society of America Journal 5:5.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.09.0335.Google Scholar
  45. Nave LE, Vance ED, Swanston CW, Curtis PS. 2010. Harvest impacts on soil carbon storage in temperate forests. Forest Ecology and Management 259:857–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Petrenko CL, Friedland AJ. 2015. Mineral soil carbon pool responses to forest clearing in Northeastern hardwood forests. GCB Bioenergy 7:1283–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pureswaran DS, De Grandpré L, Paré D, Taylor A, Barrette M, Morin H, Régnière J, Kneeshaw DD. 2015. Climate-induced changes in host tree–insect phenology may drive ecological state-shift in boreal forests. Ecology 96:1480–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rhoades CC, Hubbard RM, Elder K. 2017. A decade of streamwater nitrogen and forest dynamics after a mountain pine beetle outbreak at the Fraser Experimental Forest, Colorado. Ecosystems 20:380–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rhoades CC, McCutchan JH, Cooper LA, Clow D, Detmer TM, Briggs JS, Stednick JD, Veblen TT, Ertz RM, Likens GE, Lewis WM. 2013. Biogeochemistry of beetle-killed forests: Explaining a weak nitrate response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:1756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rhoades CC, Pelz AK, Fornwalt JP, Wolk HB, Cheng SA. 2018. Overlapping bark beetle outbreaks, salvage logging and wildfire restructure a lodgepole pine ecosystem. Forests 9.Google Scholar
  51. Russell CA, Kosola KR, Paul EA, Robertson GP. 2004. Nitrogen cycling in poplar stands defoliated by insects. Biogeochemistry 68:365–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sage L, Smith C, Werner K, Thiffault E, Pare D, Bernier P. 2019. Empirical and predicted boreal forest carbon pools following stem-only harvesting in Quebec, Canada. Soil Science Society of America Journal.Google Scholar
  53. Senez-Gagnon F, Thiffault E, Paré D, Achim A, Bergeron Y. 2018. Dynamics of detrital carbon pools following harvesting of a humid eastern Canadian balsam fir boreal forest. Forest Ecology and Management 430:33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soil Classification Working Group. 1998. The Canadian system of soil classification, 3rd ed. In: Ottawa, ON: NRC Research PressGoogle Scholar
  55. Stadler B, Müller T, Orwig D, Cobb R. 2005. Hemlock woolly adelgid in New England forests: canopy impacts transforming ecosystem processes and landscapes. Ecosystems 8:233–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thiffault E, Paré D, Bélanger N, Munson A, Marquis F. 2006. Harvesting intensity at clear-felling in the boreal forest. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70:691–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thom D, Seidl R. 2015. Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests. Biological Reviews 91:760–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thorn S, Bässler C, Brandl R, Burton PJ, Cahall R, Campbell JL, Castro J, Choi C-Y, Cobb T, Donato DC, Durska E, Fontaine JB, Gauthier S, Hebert C, Hothorn T, Hutto RL, Lee E-J, Leverkus AB, Lindenmayer DB, Obrist MK, Rost J, Seibold S, Seidl R, Thom D, Waldron K, Wermelinger B, Winter M-B, Zmihorski M, Müller J. 2018. Impacts of salvage logging on biodiversity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 55:279–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Titus BD, Prescott CE, Maynard DG, Mitchell AK, Bradley RL, Feller MC, Beese WJ (Bill), Seely WJ, Benton RA, Senyk JP, Hawkins BJ, Koppenaa R. 2006. Post-harvest nitrogen cycling in clearcut and alternative silvicultural systems in a montane forest in coastal British Columbia. The Forestry Chronicle 82:844–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner MG. 2010. Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 91:2833–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zerpa JL, Allen HL, McLaughlin BC, Phelan J, Campbell RG, Hu S. 2014. Postharvest forest floor manipulation effects on nutrient dynamics in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44:1058–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Her majesty the Queen in right of Canada 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Martineau
    • 1
  • Julien Beguin
    • 1
  • Armand Séguin
    • 1
  • David Paré
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Natural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest ServiceStn. Sainte-FoyCanada

Personalised recommendations