Optimising Seagrass Conservation for Ecological Functions
Animals are central to numerous ecological processes that shape the structure and function of ecosystems. It follows that species that are strongly linked to specific functions can represent these functions spatially and hence be useful in conservation planning. Here we test this notion of ‘functional species surrogacy’ for the conservation of seagrass meadows that have been impacted by stressors. We measured algal herbivory and herbivorous fish assemblages across a range of seagrass meadows in the Moreton Bay Marine Park, Queensland, Australia. We determined the suitability of herbivorous fish to act as a surrogate for the function of algal herbivory and modelled the abundance of this surrogate, and thus herbivory, in seagrass meadows to compare the spatial distribution of this function within existing reserves. We used underwater video systems to determine the abundance of all herbivorous fish species in seagrass meadows. The abundance of the dusky rabbitfish (Siganus fuscescens) was the best predictor of algal herbivory in seagrass meadows, supporting the suitability of this species as a functional surrogate. The distribution of dusky rabbitfish, and therefore the ecological function of herbivory, was not well represented in the Moreton Bay Marine Park protected areas. Only 7% of the equivalent area of seagrass meadows protected in marine reserves were found to have high abundances of dusky rabbitfish. We demonstrate that the abundance of functionally important herbivores can be suitable as a surrogate for herbivory in seagrass conservation. Our findings show that data on the spatial distribution of ecological functions can alter priorities for reserve design, and we suggest that our functional approach to species surrogacy is likely to improve conservation performance in seagrass ecosystems.
Keywordscoastal ecosystems conservation prioritisation herbivory seagrass surrogate species fish
We thank the three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their comments on this manuscript. We thank the staff of the Moreton Bay Research Station and K. Finlayson, E. Bell, N. Harcla-Goody, and B. Meteyard for field assistance. The Australian Rivers Institute and the Griffith University School of Environment funded the project.
Data for this paper are archived in the University of the Sunshine Coast Research Bank.
- Bartoń K. 2013. MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.9. 13. The comprehensive R archive network (CRAN). Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
- Bennett J, Fisk G, Abal E, Stevens TF, Connolly R, Schlacher TA, Udy N, Rissik D, Zeller B, Winning M, Deacon G. 2009. Towards understanding the ecological health and character of Moreton Bay. In: 2nd Queensland Coastal Conference. Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
- Caro T. 2010. Conservation by proxy: indicator, umbrella, keystone, flagship, and other surrogate species. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
- EHMP. 2016. Healthy waterways and catchments: ecosystem health monitoring program. Available at: http://healthywaterways.org.
- Gibbes B, Grinham A, Neil D, Olds A, Maxwell P, Connolly R, Weber T, Udy N, Udy J. 2014. Moreton Bay and its estuaries: a sub-tropical system under pressure from rapid population growth. In: Wolanski E, Ed. Estuaries of Australia in 2050 and beyond. Estuaries of the World. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hunter M Jr, Westgate M, Barton P, Calhoun A, Pierson J, Tulloch A, Beger M, Branquinho C, Caro T, Gross J, Heino J, Lane P, Longo C, Martin K, McDowell WH, Mellin C, Salo H, Lindenmayer D. 2016. Two roles for ecological surrogacy: Indicator surrogates and management surrogates. Ecol Indic 63:121–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lindenmayer D, Pierson J, Barton P, Beger M, Branquinho C, Calhoun A, Caro T, Greig H, Gross J, Heino J, Hunter M, Lane P, Longo C, Martin K, McDowell WH, Mellin C, Salo H, Tulloch A, Westgate M. 2015. A new framework for selecting environmental surrogates. Sci Total Environ 538:1029–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maxwell PS, Eklöf JS, van Katwijk MM, O’brien KR, de la Torre-Castro M, Boström C, Bouma TJ, Krause-Jensen D, Unsworth RK, van Tussenbroek BI. 2017. The fundamental role of ecological feedback mechanisms for the adaptive management of seagrass ecosystems—a review. Biol Rev 92:1521–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Olds AD, Nagelkerken I, Huijbers CM, Gilby BL, Pittman SJ, Schlacher TA. 2017. Connectivity in coastal seascapes. Seascape ecology. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Wood S. 2012. gamm4: generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4. R package version 0.1-6.Google Scholar