Advertisement

Survival of the cleanest? Evidence from a plant-level analysis of pollutant emissions in Canadian pulp and paper industry, 2005–2013

  • Jean-Thomas BernardEmail author
  • Jakir Hussain
  • Mishaal Masud Sinha
Research Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

We capitalize on access to plant-level data in examining the changes in emissions of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), and greenhouse gas (GHG) for a set of Canadian pulp and paper mills from 2005 to 2013. In particular, we investigate the roles played by changes in output, emission intensity, allocation of production among surviving plants, and plant closures. Output change is the main factor and improvement of emission intensity by surviving plants—the so-called technique effect—brings a small, yet positive contribution. However, there are no indications that market operations determining plant output and plant survival lead to lower emissions.

Keywords

Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) Total suspended solids (TSS) Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions Technique effect Pulp and paper industry 

JEL classification

Q55 

Notes

References

  1. Adès J, Bernard J-T, González P (2012) Energy use and GHG emissions in the Quebec pulp and paper industry, 1990–2006. Can Public Policy 38(1):71–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldy JE (2016) Frameworks for evaluating policy approaches to address the competitiveness concerns of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, Resources for the Future discussion paper 16-06. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2738759,  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2738759
  3. Bae H (2017) Do plants decrease pollution reduction efforts during a recession? Evidence from Upstate New York chemical plants during the US great recession. Env Res Econ 66(4):671–687.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9967-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunel C (2017) Pollution offshoring and emission reductions in EU and US manufacturing. Env Res Econ 68(3):621–641.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0035-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CIEEDAC (2015) Energy use and related data: canadian paper manufacturing industries, (1990) to 2013, report prepared by Canadian Industrial Energy End-use Data and Analysis Centre, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, for the Forest Products Association of Canada (FPAC). http://www2.cieedac.sfu.ca/media/publications/Pulp_Paper_Analysis_2014__2013__Final-2.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2016
  6. Environment and Climate Change Canada (2012) Status report on the pulp and paper effluent regulations, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 2012. https://ec.gc.ca/Publications/A231D61D-E897-4257-9E4B-F65CF5A8B5AD/780_PPER_Status_Report_e_04.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2016
  7. Environment and Climate Change Canada (2016) Canadian environmental sustainability indicators: managing pulp and paper effluent quality in Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. http://ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/19374730-E0FE-47AA-B8E1-6C846B2CFA3E/ManagingPulpandPaperEffluentQualityinCanada_en.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2016
  8. FAO (2002, 2007 and 2014) Yearbook of forest products, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/forestry/statistics/80570/en/. Accessed 1 Dec 2017
  9. Greenstone M, List JA, Syverson C (2012) The effects of environmental regulation on the competitiveness of US Manufacturing. In: NBER Working Paper, No. 18392, 2012. https://www.nber.org/papers/w18392. Accessed 12 Jan 2016
  10. Hailu A (2003) Pollution abatement and productivity performance of regional Canadian pulp and paper industries. J Forest Econ 9(1):5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Levinson A (2009) Technology, international trade, and pollution from US manufacturing. Am Econ Rev 99(5):2177–2192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levinson A (2015) A Direct estimate of the technique effect: changes in the pollution intensity of US manufacturing, 1990–2008. J Assoc Env Res Econ 2(1):43–56Google Scholar
  13. Natural Resources Canada (2016) The State of Canada’s Forests: Annual Report 2014, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada. http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/35713.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2016
  14. Paillé G (2012) Histoire forestière du Canada. Les Publications du Québec, QuébecGoogle Scholar
  15. Shapiro JS, Walker R (2018) Why is pollution from US manufacturing declining? The roles of environmental regulation, productivity, and trade. Am Econ Rev 108(12):3814–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sinclair WF (1991) Controlling effluent discharges from Canadian pulp and paper manufacturers. Can Public Policy 17(1):86–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Statistics Canada (2016) CANSIM Table 129-0003: sales of natural gas, monthly, CANSIM (database). http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&id=1290003. Accessed 18 Feb 2016

Copyright information

© Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Thomas Bernard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jakir Hussain
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mishaal Masud Sinha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of Finance CanadaGovernment of CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations