Advertisement

The cost of floods in developing countries’ megacities: a hedonic price analysis of the Jakarta housing market, Indonesia

  • José Armando Cobián ÁlvarezEmail author
  • Budy P. Resosudarmo
Research Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Although many megacities in developing countries experience floods annually that affect a large number of people, relatively few empirical studies have evaluated the associated costs. This paper estimates such costs by conducting a hedonic price analysis—providing evidence regarding the impacts of floods on the housing market. A robust regression technique on a simple linear transformation model, and a maximum likelihood estimation technique on the spatial lag version of the simple linear transformation model, are utilised to estimate the correlation between the level of the 2007 floods and monthly housing rental prices in Jakarta, Indonesia. This paper sheds light on the fact that in developing countries’ megacities, the total cost of floods among households is significantly lower compared to the total amount of funding needed to permanently eliminate floods in these megacities. Hence, a constant exposure of the urban areas in developing countries to flood damage will most likely keep happening.

Keywords

Environmental economics Hedonic price analysis Spatial analysis Flood 

JEL classification

Q51 Q54 R32 O21 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank M. Agung Widodo for managing the IFLS data set for this paper. Some financial supports were received from the Australia Indonesia Centre (AIC). All mistakes are the authors’ responsibility.

References

  1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atreya A, Ferreira S, Kriesel W (2013) Forgetting the flood?: an analysis of the flood risk discount over time. Land Econ 89(4):577–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker J (2011) Climate change, disaster risk, and the urban poor: cities building resilience for a changing world. World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bappenas (2007) Laporan Perkiraan Kerusakan dan Kerugian Pasca Bencana Banjir Awal Februari 2007 di Wilayah JABODETABEK (Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, dan Bekasi). Technical report, Kementerian Negara Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/BAPPENAS, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu S, Thibodeau TG (1998) Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in house prices. J Real Estate Finance Econ 17:61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bin O, Landry C (2013) Changes in implicit flood risk premiums: empirical evidence from the housing market. J Environ Econ Manag 65(3):361–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bin O, Polasky S (2004) Effects of flood hazards on property values: evidence before and after hurricane Floyd. Land Econ 80(4):490–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bin O, Crawford T, Kruse J, Landry C (2008a) Viewscapes and flood hazard: coastal housing market response to amenities and risk. Land Econ 84(3):434–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bin O, Kruse J, Landry C (2008b) Flood hazards, insurance rates and amenities: evidence from the coastal housing market. J Risk Insur 75(1):63–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brasington DM, Hite D (2005) Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35(1):57–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Budiyono Y, Aerts JCJH, Brinkman J, Marfai MA, Ward PJ (2015) Flood risk assessment for delta mega–cities: a case study of Jakarta. Nat Hazards 75:389–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Budiyono Y, Aerts JCJH, Tollenaar D, Ward PJ (2016) River flood risk in Jakarta under scenarios of future change. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 16:757–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carbone J, Hallstrom D, Smith V (2006) Can natural experiments measure behavioural responses to environmental risks? Environ Resour Econ 33(3):273–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CEIC Data (2017) see CEIC Data Company LimitedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cho S, Clark C, Park W, Kim S (2009) Spatial and temporal variation in the housing market values of lot size and open space. Land Econ 85(1):51–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen B (2004) Urban growth in developing countries: a review of current trends and a caution regarding existing forecasts. World Dev 32(1):23–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daniel V, Florax R, Rietveld P (2007) Long term divergence between ex-ante and ex-post hedonic prices of the Meuse River flooding in The Netherlands. Discussion Paper, European Regional Science Association. http://www.tbm.tudelft.nl/fileadmin/Faculteit/CiTG/Over_de_faculteit/Afdelingen/Afdeling_Waterbouwkunde/sectie_waterbouwkunde/people/personal/gelder/publications/citations/doc/citatie_806.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2016
  18. Follain J, Malpezzi S (1980) Estimates of housing inflation for thirty-nine SMSAs: An alternative to the consumer price index. Annal Reg Sci 14(3):41–56Google Scholar
  19. Garschagen M, Harb M, Surtiari G (2018) Is Jakarta’s new flood risk reduction strategy transformational? Sustainability 10(2934):1–18Google Scholar
  20. Gujarati DN (1995) Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill International Editions, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Halvorsen R, Pollakowski HO (1981) Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations. J Urban Econ 10(1):37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jha K, Bloch R, Lamond J (2012) Cities and flooding: a guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century. World Bank, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kousky C (2010) Learning from extreme events: risk perceptions after the flood. Land Econ 86(3):395–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kousky C, Walls M (2014) Floodplain conservation as a flood mitigation strategy: examining costs and benefits. Ecol Econ 104:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74(2):132–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leggett C, Bockstael NE (2000) Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices. J Environ Econ Manag 39(2):121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malpezzi S (2002) Hedonic pricing models: a selective and applied review. The Center for Urban Land Economics Research, University of Wisconsin, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  28. Perticone A, Coveney C (2017) The effects from public transportation on property values: a closer look at Scituate, Hanover, and Norwell, Massachusetts. J Environ Resour Econ Colby 4(1):1–16 (article 4) Google Scholar
  29. Pope J (2008) Do seller disclosures affect property values? buyer information and the hedonic model. Land Econ 84(4):551–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rabassa MJ, Zoloa JI (2016) Flooding risks and housing markets: a spatial hedonic analysis for La Plata City. Environment and Development Economics. http://www.saerargentina.com.ar/trabajos/8%20-%20Zoloa%20–%20Flooding%20risk%20La%20Plata.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2016
  31. Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Polit Econ 82(1):34–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Samarasinghe O, Sharp B (2010) Flood prone risk and amenity values: a spatial hedonic analysis: a spatial hedonic analysis. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 54(4):457–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skantz T, Strickland T (1987) House prices and a flood event—an empirical investigation of market efficiency. J Real Estate Res 2(2):75–83Google Scholar
  34. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the stern review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tambun L, Lumanauw N, Marhaenjati B (2015) ‘Jakarta’s flood problem totally solvable, for $9,2b. Jakarta GlobeGoogle Scholar
  36. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2016
  37. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2002) Guidelines for reducing flood losses. http://www.unisdr.org/files/558_7639.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2016
  38. United Nations & World Bank (2010) Natural hazards, unnatural disasters: the economics of effective prevention. World Bank, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wahab R, Tiong R (2017) Multi-variate residential flood loss estimation model for Jakarta: an approach based on a combination of statistical techniques. Nat Hazards 86:779–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wijayanti P, Zhu Tiong R, Hellegers P, Budiyono Y, Van Ierland EC (2017) Estimation of river flood damages in Jakarta. Nat Hazards 86:1059–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wooldridge J (2003) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach, 2d edn. Thompson and Southwestern, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  42. World Bank (2011) Climate change, disaster risk and the urban poor: cities building resilience for a changing world. World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  43. World Bank (2016) Feature story: keeping Indonesia’s capital safer from floods. World Bank, Jakarta. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2016/01/08/keeping-indonesias-capital-safer-from-floods. Accessed 8 Jan 2016
  44. World Resources Institute (2015) World’s 15 countries with the most people exposed to river floods. http://www.wri.org/blog/2015/03/world%E2%8%99s-15-countries-most-people-exposed-river-floods. Accessed 14 Mar 2016
  45. Yusuf AA, Koundouri P (2005) Willingness to pay for water and location bias in hedonic price analysis: evidence from the Indonesian housing market. Environ Dev Econ 10(6):821–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yusuf A et al (2009) Does clean air matter in developing countries’ megacities? a hedonic price analysis of the Jakarta housing market, Indonesia. Ecol Econ 68(5):1398–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arndt‐Corden Department of Economics, Crawford School of Public PolicyAustralian National UniversityActonAustralia

Personalised recommendations