Advertisement

A study of a gravity compensation system for the spacecraft prototype test by using multi-robot system

  • Ayana Nakayama
  • Tomohiro Hirata
  • Katsuyoshi TsujitaEmail author
Original Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

In our research, we proposed a system using multi-robot as a gravity compensation system for a ground test of a spacecraft with a deployable structure. The advantage of the system is its low cost and versatility. When the robots support the beam at the nodes, we can expect to simulate the free vibration of the space structure using the proposed system under gravity. In this study, supporting a uniform, flexible beam with vibration was first implemented to verify the performance of the proposed system. Then we investigated the performance of the system applying to the mock-up model of a spacecraft with a deployable structure as a demonstration.

Keywords

Deployable space structure Prototype test Gravity compensation Multi-robot 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to Dr. Naoko Kishimoto who gave me very important advice and cooperation.

References

  1. 1.
    ”Mars 2020 Rover,” NASA, updated August 4, 2017, https://www.nasa.gov/mars2020. Accessed 10 Nov 2018
  2. 2.
    ”Orion Spacecraft,” NASA, updated March 26, 2019. https://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/orion/index.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2019
  3. 3.
    ”Launch schedule, Upcoming Launch Vehicle and Satellite Launches,” JAXA, http://global.jaxa.jp/projects/in_progress.html, updated: October 30, 2018. Accessed 10 Dec 2018
  4. 4.
    Paules G, Luther M (2000) NASA’s Earth science program-increasing science opportunity and payoff through small satellites. Acta Astronaut 46:61–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Esper J, Panetta PV, Ryschkewitsch M, Wiscombe W, Neeck S (2000) NASA-GSFC nano-satellite technology for Earth science missions. Acta Astronaut 46:287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fischer A, Pellegrino S (2000) Interaction between gravity compensation suspension system and deployable structure. J. Spacecr Rockets 37:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schultheiß Daniel, ”Gravity Compensation of Deployable Solar Arrays for Small Spacecraft,” http://www-civ.eng.cam.ac.uk/dsl/publications/Schultheiss_Diploma_paper.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2019
  8. 8.
    Xu Z, Guannan Y, Hai H, Xinsheng W (2010) Deployment analysis and test of a coilable mast for BUAA Student Micro-satellite, IEEE systems and control in aeronautics and astronautics (ISSCAA), 3rd international symposium, pp 1339–1332Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sawada H, Mori O, Okuizumi N, Shirasawa Y, Miyazaki Y, Natori M et al (2011) Mission report on the solar power sail deployment demonstration of IKAROS. In: 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conferenceGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greschik G, Mikulas MM (2002) Design study of a square solar sail architecture. J. Spacecr. Rockets 39:653–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meguro A (1993) A module concept for a cable-mesh deployable antenna. In: 27th aerospace mechanism symposium, NASA-CP-3205, pp 51–66Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meguro A, Mitsugi J (1995) Design and analysis of deployable modular mesh structures for a large space antenna. In: 6th European space mechanisms and tribology symposium, ESA-SP-374, pp 319–324Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schenk Mark, Viquerat Andrew D, Seffen Keith A, Guest Simon D (2014) Review of inflatable booms for deployable space structures: packing and rigidization. J. Spacecr. Rockets 51:762–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dean W, Sparks Jr, Juang JN (1992) ’Survey of experiments and experimental fascilities for control of flexible structures. J Guidance Control Dyn 15Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sparks DW, Juang J (1992) Survey of experiments and experimental facilities for control of flexible structures. J Guidance Control Dyn 15:801–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zwanenburg R (1995) The qualification test programme of the ENVISAT solar array mechanism. In: Sixth European space mechanisms and tribology symposium, pp 65–72Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Engineering Test Satellite VIII ”KIKU No.8” (ETS-VIII), JAXA, 2012. http://global.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/ets8/. Accessed 15 Sep 2018
  18. 18.
    Schwartz Jana L, Peck Mason A, Hall Christopher D (2003) Historical review of air-bearing spacecraft simulators. J Guidance Control Dyn 26:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nitta K, Tsujita K, Kishimoto N (2016) Development of a robotic gravity compensation system for the prototype test of spacecraft. In: IEEE/SICE int. conf. of symposium on system integration, pp 272–277Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abe M, Natori MC, Higuchi K, Shiogama Y (1998) Behavior of space membrane at retrieval phase. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng 598(I–44):247–256 (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Artificial Life and Robotics (ISAROB) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayana Nakayama
    • 1
  • Tomohiro Hirata
    • 1
  • Katsuyoshi Tsujita
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronic Systems EngineeringOsaka Institute of TechnologyOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations