Advertisement

The effect of carbonaceous materials on faradaic and charging current contribution in carbon paste electrodes investigated by chemometrics methods

  • S. Ahmadpour
  • J. TashkhourianEmail author
  • B. HemmateenejadEmail author
Original Paper
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Different carbon paste electrodes were prepared from carbonaceous materials including multi-walled carbon nanotubes (functionalized and pristine form), graphite powder, pencil graphite, and activated carbon. The electrochemical characteristics and different current contributions of these electrodes were quantitatively compared in K4[Fe(CN)6] and dopamine as two common benchmark redox system, using multivariate curve resolution–alternating least squares (MCR-ALS), as a powerful chemometrics technique. The total current of these electrochemical system recorded in potential-step mode was resolved to its three main current constituents including faradaic current, step charging current, and induced charging current. The contribution of each type of currents in total current was related to the structure and composition of the electrode as well as the nature of the analyte and supporting electrolyte. The focus of this study was on the contribution of faradaic current and nature of conductive phase in carbon paste electrodes. This approach can be effective for the identification of optimal electrode materials for voltammetric analysis and leads to new design criteria for carbon electrodes employed. The obtained results demonstrate that the nature of the conductive phase has a significant effect on faradaic current contribution. Results showed that activated carbon, as conductive phases, has the minimum contribution of faradaic current whereas functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube has the maximum contribution of faradaic current compared with other carbonaceous materials.

Keywords

MCR-ALS Faradaic current Multi-walled carbon nanotubes Activated carbon Pencil graphite Graphite 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of this work by Shiraz University Research Council.

Supplementary material

10008_2019_4422_MOESM1_ESM.docx (589 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 589 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Falcao EH, Wudl F (2007) Carbon allotropes: beyond graphite and diamond. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82(6):524–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hirsch A (2010) The era of carbon allotropes. Nat Mater 9(11):868–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Menendez-Diaz J, Martin-Gullon I (2006) Types of carbon adsorbents and their production. In: Interface science and technology, vol 7. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–47Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang G, Shao Z, Yu Z (2007) Comparisons of different carbon conductive additives on the electrochemical performance of activated carbon. Nanotechnology 18(20):205705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang LL, Zhao X (2009) Carbon-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes. Chem Soc Rev 38(9):2520–2531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frackowiak E, Beguin F (2001) Carbon materials for the electrochemical storage of energy in capacitors. Carbon 39(6):937–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCreery RL (2008) Advanced carbon electrode materials for molecular electrochemistry. Chem Rev 108(7):2646–2687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Apetrei C, Apetrei IM, Saja JAD, Rodriguez-Mendez ML (2011) Carbon paste electrodes made from different carbonaceous materials: application in the study of antioxidants. Sensors 11(2):1328–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Safavi A, Maleki N, Aghakhani Mahyari F, Doroodmand MM (2013) Comparative study of carbon ionic liquid electrodes based on different carbon allotropes as conductive phase. Fuller Nanotub Car N 21(6):472–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perati PR, Cheng J, Jandik P, Hanko VP (2010) Disposable carbon electrodes for liquid chromatographic detection of catecholamines in blood plasma samples. Electroanalysis 22(3):325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Özcan A, Şahin Y (2009) Selective and sensitive voltammetric determination of dopamine in blood by electrochemically treated pencil graphite electrodes. Electroanalysis 21(21):2363–2370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J, Kawde A-N, Sahlin E (2000) Renewable pencil electrodes for highly sensitive stripping potentiometric measurements of DNA and RNA. Analyst 125(1):5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang J, Kawde A-N (2001) Pencil-based renewable biosensor for label-free electrochemical detection of DNA hybridization. Anal Chim Acta 431(2):219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Majidi MR, Saadatirad A, Alipour E (2011) Voltammetric determination of hemoglobin using a pencil lead electrode. Electroanalysis 23(8):1984–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kariuki JK (2012) An electrochemical and spectroscopic characterization of pencil graphite electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 159(9):H747–H751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tashkhourian J, Hemmateenejad B, Ahmadpour S, Bayat ET (2017) A comparative study on the effect of ionic liquid composition on the contributions of faradaic current in ionic liquid carbon paste electrodes by chemometrics method. J Electroanal Chem 801:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tu J, Cai W, Shao X (2013) Direct separation of faradaic and double layer charging current in potential step voltammetry. Talanta 116:575–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Forster RJ (1994) Microelectrodes: new dimensions in electrochemistry. Chem Soc Rev 23(4):289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    He J, Ma X, Zhu Y, Li F, Tang X, Zhang X, Zhang M (2013) Facile fabrication of regular Au microband electrode arrays for voltammetric detection down to submicromolar level by hydrogel etching. Electrochem Commun 30:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shults W, Haga F, Mueller T, Jones H (1965) Chronopotentiometer with compensation for extraneous currents. Anal Chem 37(11):1415–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bos P, Van Dalen E (1973) Improvement of the chronopotentiometric method by the use of a potentiostat and a capacity-current addition device. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 45(2):165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Breczko J, Plonska-Brzezinska ME, Echegoyen L (2012) Electrochemical oxidation and determination of dopamine in the presence of uric and ascorbic acids using a carbon nano-onion and poly (diallyldimethylammonium chloride) composite. Electrochim Acta 72:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gulaboski R, Kokoškarova P, Mitrev S (2012) Theoretical aspects of several successive two-step redox mechanisms in protein-film cyclic staircase voltammetry. Electrochim Acta 69:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Safavi A, Hemmateenejad B, Honarasa F (2013) Chemometrics assisted resolving of net faradaic current contribution from total current in potential step and staircase cyclic voltammetry. Anal Chim Acta 766:34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abbaspour A, Tashkhourian J, Ahmadpour S, Mirahmadi E, Sharghi H, Khalifeh R, Shahriyari M (2014) Construction of a new selective coated disk electrode for Ag (I) based on modified polypyrrole-carbon nanotubes composite with new lariat ether. Mater Sci Eng C 34:326–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taurino I, Carrara S, Giorcelli M, Tagliaferro A, De Micheli G (2012) Comparison of two different carbon nanotube-based surfaces with respect to potassium ferricyanide electrochemistry. Surf Sci 606(3–4):156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Báez DF, Bollo S (2016) A comparative study of electrochemical performances of carbon nanomaterial-modified electrodes for DNA detection. Nanotubes or graphene? J Solid State Electrochem 20(4):1059–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lehman JH, Terrones M, Mansfield E, Hurst KE, Meunier V (2011) Evaluating the characteristics of multiwall carbon nanotubes. Carbon 49(8):2581–2602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prasad KS, Muthuraman G, Zen J-M (2008) The role of oxygen functionalities and edge plane sites on screen-printed carbon electrodes for simultaneous determination of dopamine, uric acid and ascorbic acid. Electrochem Commun 10(4):559–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceShiraz UniversityShirazIran

Personalised recommendations