Advertisement

Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 367–377 | Cite as

Suppressing volume change and in situ electrochemical atom force microscopy observation during the lithiation/delithiation process for CuO nanorod array electrodes

  • Yue Chen
  • Xihong Peng
  • Xinyue Fan
  • Qing Yu
  • Guiying Zhao
  • Yingbin Lin
  • Jiaxin LiEmail author
  • Zhigao HuangEmail author
Original Paper
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

A big challenge in the high-performance transition metal oxide anode for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is relieving the volume changes during the lithiation/delithiation. In this work, CuO nanorod array was produced via glancing angle deposition and directly used as anode materials for thin film electrodes of LIBs. The obtained CuO nanorod array anodes show good LIB performance with a capacity of 220 μAh/cm2/μm tested at 100 μA/cm2 after 80 cycles and excellent rate performance. The obtained properties for CuO nanorod array anodes were much better than thin film anodes without nanorod array structure. In addition, the in situ electrochemical atom force microscopy (EC-AFM) characterization has been used to reveal the enhanced mechanism of CuO nanorod array anodes. On the one hand, CuO nanorods within the electrodes may serve as the hosts for Li+, and ease intercalation by shortening Li+ ion diffusion pathways, resulting in the remarkable cycling stability and rate performance. On the other hand, the “breathing” of CuO nanorod array electrode clearly observed by in situ EC-AFM with the appearance and disappearance of cracks, demonstrated that the nanorod array may act as a buffering to alleviate the giant volume variations during the cycling. As a result, the remarkable stability of the CuO nanorod array electrode allowed its use in a full lithium-ion cell with a pervasive LiCoO2 thin film cathode. Additionally, we also observed the SEI formed on the surface of electrode during cycling, which may benefit the further studies on transition metal oxide as anodes for LIBs.

Keywords

CuO nanorod array Thin film electrode In situ EC-AFM Suppressing volume change 

Notes

Funding information

This study is financially supported by the Natural Science Foundations of China (Nos. 61574037, 11344008, 11204038) and Natural Science Foundations of Fujian Province (No. 2017J01035).

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang WJ (2011) A review of the electrochemical performance of alloy anodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 196:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dar MA, Sang HN, Kim YS, Kim WB (2010) Synthesis, characterization, and electrochemical properties of self-assembled leaf-like CuO nanostructures. J Solid State Electrochem 14:1719–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang XL, Wang RZ, Xu D, Wang ZL, Wang HG, Xu JJ, Wu Z, Liu QC, Zhang Y, Zhang XB (2013) Homogeneous CoO on graphene for binder-free and ultralong-life lithium ion batteries. Adv Func Mater 23:4345–4353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang Y, Huang X, Lian J, Xu D, Wang L, Zhang X (2012) Self-assembly of ultrathin porous NiO nanosheets/graphene hierarchical structure for high-capacity and high-rate lithium storage. J Mater Chem 22:2844–2847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang H, Ma D, Huang X, Yun H, Zhang X (2012) General and controllable synthesis strategy of metal oxide/TiO2 hierarchical heterostructures with improved lithium-ion battery performance. Sci Rep 2:701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Z, Xu D, Wang H, Wu Z, Zhang X (2013) In situ fabrication of porous graphene electrodes for high-performance energy storage. ACS Nano 7:2422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hou J, Shao Y, Ellis M, Moore R, Yi B (2011) Graphene-based electrochemical energy conversion and storage: fuel cells, supercapacitors and lithium ion batteries. Phys Chem Chem Phy 13:15384–15402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang J, Takeda Y, Imanishi N, Capiglia C, Xie J, Yamamoto O (2002) SiOx-based anodes for secondary lithium batteries. Solid State Ionics 152:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Szczech J, Song J (2010) Nanostructured silicon for high capacity lithium battery anodes. Energy Environ Sci 4:56–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park C, Kim J, Kim H, Sohn H (2010) Li-alloy based anode materials for li secondary batteries. Chem Soc Rev 39:3115–3141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun MH, Qi K, Li XM, Huang QM, Wei JK, Xu Z, Wang WL, Bai XD (2016) Revealing the electrochemical lithiation routes of CuO nanowires by in-situ TEM. Chemelectrochem 3:1296–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pan Q, Jin H, Wang H, Yin G (2007) Flower-like CuO film-electrode for lithium ion batteries and the effect of surface morphology on electrochemical performance. Electrochim Acta 53:951–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin L, Martinez H, Poinot D, Pecquenard B, Le Cras F (2014) Direct observation of important morphology and composition changes at the surface of the CuO conversion material in lithium batteries. J Power Sources 248:861–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yuan W, Luo J, Yan ZG, Tan ZH, Tang Y (2017) High-performance CuO/Cu composite current collectors with array-pattern porous structures for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 226:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duan X, Huang H, Xiao S, Deng J, Zhou G, Li Q, Wang T (2016) 3D hierarchical CuO mesocrystals from ionic liquid precursors: towards better electrochemical performance for Li-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 4:8402–8411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang Y, Zhang W, Li M, Yang Z, Chen G, Wang Q (2013) Cosurfactant-mediated microemulsion to free-standing hierarchical CuO arrays on copper substrates as anodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 1:14368–14374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen LB, Lu N, Xu CM, Yu HC, Wang TH (2009) Electrochemical performance of polycrystalline CuO nanowires as anode material for Li ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 54:4198–4201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang ZY, Su FB, Madhavi S, Lou XW (2011) CuO nanostructures supported on Cu substrate as integrated electrodes for highly reversible lithium storage. Nanoscale 3:1618–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao XP, Bao JL, Pan GL, Zhu HY, Huang PX, Wu F, Song DY (2004) Preparation and electrochemical performance of polycrystalline and single crystalline CuO nanorods as anode materials for Li ion battery. J Phys Chem B 108:5547–5551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang QB, Wang JX, Xu DG, Wang ZX, Li XH, Zhang KL (2014) Facile large-scale synthesis of vertically aligned CuO nanowires on nickel foam: growth mechanism and remarkable electrochemical performance. J Mater Chem A 2:3865–3874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen X, Zhang NQ, Sun KN (2012) Facile fabrication of CuO mesoporous nanosheet cluster array electrodes with super lithium-storage properties. J Mater Chem 22:13637–13642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xiang JY, Tu JP, Zhang J, Zhong J, Zhang D, Cheng JP (2010) Incorporation of MWCNTs into leaf-like CuO nanoplates for superior reversible Li-ion storage. Electrochem Commun 12:1103–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang ZL, Che HW, Sun J, She XL, Chen H, Su FB (2013) Template-free synthesis of mesoporous hollow CuO microspheres as anode materials for Li-ion batteries. J Nanosci Nanotechno 13:1530–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park JC, Kim J, Kwon H, Song H (2009) Gram-scale synthesis of Cu2O nanocubes and subsequent oxidation to CuO hollow nanostructures for lithium-ion battery anode materials. Adv Mater 21:803–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gangaja B, Chandrasekharan S, Vadukumpully S, Nair SV, Santhanagopalan D (2017) Surface chemical analysis of CuO nanofiber composite electrodes at different stages of lithiation/delithiation. J Power Sources 340:356–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen K, Xue D, Komarneni S (2015) Beyond theoretical capacity in Cu-based integrated anode: insight into the structural evolution of CuO. J Power Sources 275:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pandey GP, Klankowski SA, Liu T, Wu J, Li J (2017) Toward highly stable solid-state unconventional thin-film battery-supercapacitor hybrid devices: interfacing vertical core-shell array electrodes with a gel polymer electrolyte. J Power Sources 342:1006–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang WX, Ma G, Gu HY, Yang ZH, Cheng H (2015) A new lithium-ion battery: CuO nanorod array anode versus spinel LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 cathode. J Power Sources 273:561–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yoon M, Lee S, Lee D, Kim J, Moon J (2017) All-solid-state thin film battery based on well-aligned slanted LiCoO2 nanowires fabricated by glancing angle deposition. Appl Surf Sci 412:537–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen Y, Zhang L, Zhang HT, Zhong KH, Zhao GY, Chen GL, Lin YB, Chen SY, Huang ZG (2018) Band gap manipulation and physical properties of preferred orientation CuO thin films with nano wheatear array. Ceram Int 44:1134–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen C, Dong Y, Li S, Jiang Z, Wang Y, Jiao L (2016) Rapid synthesis of three-dimensional network structure CuO as binder-free anode for high-rate sodium ion battery. J Power Sources 320:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xiang JY, Tu JP, Huang XH, Yang YZ (2008) A comparison of anodically grown CuO nanotube film and Cu2O film as anodes for lithium ion batteries. J Solid State Electrochem 12:941–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Souza EA, Landers R, Cardoso LP, Cruz TGS, Tabacniks MH, Gorenstein A (2006) Evaluation of copper oxide thin films as electrodes for microbatteries. J Power Sources 155:358–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu XD, Liu GY, Wang LJ, Li YP, Ma YP, Ma JM (2016) Morphology- and facet-controlled synthesis of CuO micro/nanomaterials and analysis of their lithium ion storage properties. J Power Sources 312:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Martin L, Martinez H, Poinot D, Pecquenard B, Le Cras F (2013) Comprehensive X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of the conversion reaction mechanism of CuO in lithiated thin film electrodes. J Phys Chem C 117:4421–4430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Xiang JY, Tu JP, Zhang L, Zhou Y, Wang XL, Shi SJ (2010) Self-assembled synthesis of hierarchical nanostructured CuO with various morphologies and their application as anodes for lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources 195:313–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rossen E, Reimers JN, Dahn JR (1993) Synthesis and electrochemistry of spinel LT-LiCoO2. Solid State Ionics 62:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tintignac S, Baddour-Hadjean R, Pereira-Ramos JP, Salot R (2012) High performance sputtered LiCoO2 thin films obtained at a moderate annealing treatment combined to a bias effect. Electrochim Acta 60:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Verrelli R, Scrosati B, Sun YK, Hassoun J (2014) Stable, high voltage Li0.85Ni0.46Cu0.1Mn1.49O4 spinel cathode in a lithium-ion battery using a conversion-type CuO anode. Acs Appl Mater Inter 6:5206–5211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Höweling A, Glatthaar S, Nötzel D, Binder JR (2015) Evidence of loss of active lithium in titanium-doped LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 /graphite cells. J Power Sources 274:1267–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kim JH, Pieczonka NPW, Li Z, Wu Y, Harris S, Powell BR (2013) Understanding the capacity fading mechanism in LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 /graphite Li-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 90:556–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vidu R, Quinlan FT, Stroeve P (2002) Use of in situ electrochemical atomic force microscopy (EC-AFM) to monitor cathode surface reaction in organic electrolyte. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:6546–6554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shen C, Hu G, Cheong LZ, Huang S, Zhang JG, Wang D (2018) Direct observation of the growth of lithium dendrites on graphite anodes by operando EC-AFM. Small Methods 2:1700298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yang F (2011) Criterion for insertion-induced microcracking and debonding of thin films. J Power Sources 196:465–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang CP, Ma ZS, Wang Y, Lu CS (2016) Failure prediction of high-capacity electrode materials in lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 163:A1157–A1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Beaulieu LY, Eberman KW, Turner RL, Krause LJ, Dahn JR (2001) Colossal reversible volume changes in lithium alloys. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 4:A137–A140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Beaulieu LY, Cumyn VK, Eberman KW, Krause LJ, Dahn JR (2001) A system for performing simultaneous in situ atomic force microscopy/optical microscopy measurements on electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Rev Sci Instrum 72:3313–3319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yue Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xihong Peng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xinyue Fan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qing Yu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guiying Zhao
    • 1
    • 3
  • Yingbin Lin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jiaxin Li
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Zhigao Huang
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Physics and Energy, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Manipulation and New Energy MaterialsFujian Normal UniversityFuzhouChina
  2. 2.Fujian Provincial Engineering Technical Research Centre of Solar-Energy Conversion and Stored EnergyFuzhouChina
  3. 3.Fujian Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for Optoelectronic Semiconductors and Efficient DevicesXiamenChina

Personalised recommendations