Advertisement

Modeling of electrochemical properties of potential-induced defects in butane-thiol SAMs by using artificial neural network and impedance spectroscopy data

  • Adel Belayadi
  • Ahmed Mougari
  • Mokhtar Zabat
Original Paper
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is commonly used in studying solid–liquid interfacial properties. In this work, the electrochemical behavior of potential-induced defects in self-assembled CH3(CH2)3SH monolayer (SAM) electrodeposited on the surface of a mono-crystalline gold rod has been experimentally investigated and theoretically modeled. An equivalent electrical circuit with mixed kinetic and charge transfer is applied to analyze the impedance of the experimental data of the interface. The results are compared to those obtained with a second model calculation based on an artificial neural network (ANN) for predicting the electrochemical properties of the same interface. The proposed approach defines the equivalent circuit elements for the interface under study. The latter is based on adjusting the electrical parameters by using a detailed methodology proposed to build up the equivalent circuit. We illustrated the experimental and predicted numerical simulation of the corresponding model. Numerical simulation of the neural network model shows the impact of using equivalent circuits to describe the features of the materials under study. The results demonstrate a high performance in predicting and optimizing the equivalent circuit. The advantage of our adopted model appears by comparing our model results and experimental data analysis.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Neural network model Thiol SAMs Partial desorption Impedance spectroscopy Electrochemical properties 

References

  1. 1.
    Alar V, Žmak I, Runje B, Horvatić A (2016) Development of models for prediction of corrosion and pitting potential on AISI 304 stainless steel in different environmental conditions. Int J Electrochem Sci 11:7674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Youshia J, Ali ME, Lamprecht A (2017) Artificial neural network based particle size prediction of polymeric nanoparticles. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 119:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raja MAZ (2014) Solution of the one-dimensional Bratu equation arising in the fuel ignition model using ANN optimised with PSO and SQP. Connect Sci 26(3):195–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quan GZ, Wang T, Li YL, Zhan ZY, Xia YF (2016) Artificial neural network modeling to evaluate the dynamic flow stress of 7050 aluminum alloy. J Mater Eng Perform 25(2):553–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li H, Zhang Z, Liu Z (2017) Application of artificial neural networks for catalysis. Catalysts 7(10):306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kasdekar DK, Parashar V, Arya C (2018) Artificial neural network models for the prediction of MRR in electro-chemical machining. Mater Today Proc 5(1):772–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lazrak A, Boudehenn F, Bonnot S, Fraisse F, Leconte A, Papillon P, Souyri B (2016) Development of a dynamic artificial neural network model of an absorption chiller and its experimental validation. Renew Energy 86:1009–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Verpoort PC, MacDonald P, Conduit GJ (2018) Materials data validation and imputation with an artificial neural network. Comput Mater Sci 147:176–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Raja MAZ, Samar R (2014) Numerical treatment for nonlinear MHD Jeffery-Hamel problem using neural networks optimized with interior point algorithm. Neurocomputing 124:178–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raja MAZ, Khan JA, Chaudhary NI, Shivanian E (2015) Reliable numerical treatment of nonlinear singular Flierl–Petviashivili equations for unbounded domain using ANN, GAs and SQP. Appl Soft Comput 38:617–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raja MAZ, Farooq U, Chaudhary NI, Wazwaz AM (2016) Stochastic numerical solver for nanofluidic problems containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Appl Soft Comput 3:561–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raja MAZ, Samar R (2016) Bio-inspired computing platform for reliable solution of Bratu-type equations arising in the modeling of electrically conducting solids. Appl Math Model 40(11-12):5964–5977.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Colorado-Garrido D, Ortega-Toledo DM, Hernández JA, González-Rodríguez JG, Uruchurtu J (2009) Neural networks for Nyquist plots prediction during corrosion inhibition of a pipeline steel. J Solid State Electrochem 13(11):1715–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raja MAZ, Khan JA, Haroon T (2015) Stochastic numerical treatment for thin film flow of third grade fluid using unsupervised neural networks. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 48:26–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raja MAZ (2014) Stochastic numerical techniques for solving Troesch’s problem. Inf Sci 279:860–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nikoo M, Sadowski L, Nikoo M (2017) Prediction of the corrosion current density in reinforced concrete using a self-organizing feature map. Coatings 7(10):160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Belayadi A, Bourahla B, Mekideche-Chafa F (2017) Neurocomputing techniques to predict the 2d structures by using lattice dynamics of surfaces. Acta Phys Pol A 132(4):1314–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Belayadi A, Ait-gougam L, Bourahla B, Mekideche-Chafa F (2016) An approach based on neural computation to simulate the transition metals using tight binding measurements. Turk J Phys 40:231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Belayadi A, Ait-Gougam L, Mekideche-Chafa F (2015) Automatic pattern recognition with wavelet neural network. Copyright 2015 ACM 978–1–4503-3418-1/15/09…$15.00.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2832987.2833011
  20. 20.
    Poirier GE (1997) Characterization of organosulfur molecular monolayers on au (111) using scanning tunneling microscopy. Chem Rev 97(4):1117–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bain DC, Troughton EB, Tao YT, Evall J, Whitesides GM, Nuzzo RG (1989) Formation of monolayer films by the spontaneous assembly of organic thiols from solution onto gold. J Am Chem Soc 111(1):321–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yavuz A, Sohrabni N, Yilmaz A, Danışman MF (2017) Mixed carboranethiol self-assembled monolayers on gold surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 413:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kolodziej A, Fernandez-Trillo F, Rodriguez P (2018) Determining the parameters governing the electrochemical stability of thiols and disulfides self-assembled monolayer on gold electrodes in physiological medium. J Electroanal Chem 819:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steinberg S, Rubinstein I (1992) Photonic polymer systems: fundamentals: methods, and applications. Langmuir 8(4):1183–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sabatani E, Rubinstein I (1987) Organized self-assembling monolayers on electrodes 2- monolayer-based ultra micro electrodes for the study of very rapid electrode kinetics. J Phys Chem 9:6663–6669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maza E, Fernández H, Zon MA, Moressi MB (2017) Electrochemical determination of fisetin using gold electrodes modified with thiol self-assembled monolayers. J Electroanal Chem 790:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kislenko SA, Nikitina VA, Nazmutdinov R (2015) High energy chemistry. A molecular dynamics study of the ionic and molecular permeability of alkanethiol monolayers on the gold electrode surface. High Energy Chem 49:341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kislenko SA, Nikitina VA, Nazmutdinov RR (2015) When do defectless alkanethiol SAMs in ionic liquids become penetrable? A molecular dynamics study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(47):31947–31955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Finklea HO, Hanshew DD (1992) Electron-transfer kinetics in organized thiol monolayers with attached pentaammine (pyridine) ruthenium redox centers. J Am Chem Soc 114(9):3173–3181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zamborini FP, Crooks PM (1998) Corrosion passivation of gold by n-alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers: effect of chain length and end group. Langmuir 14(12):3279–3286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wold DJ, Haag R, Rampi MA, Frisbie DC (2012) Distance dependence of electron tunneling through self-assembled monolayers measured by conducting probe atomic force microscopy: unsaturated versus saturated molecular junctions. J Phys Chem B 106:2813–2816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sondag-Huethorst JAM, Schonenberger C, Fokkink LGJ (1994) Formation of holes in alkanethiol monolayers on gold. J Phys Chem 98(27):6826–6834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bondarenko AS, Ragoisha GA (2005) Progress in chemometrics research. Nova Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zabat M, Morin M (2013) Stability of created nano-holes from electrodeposited organic sams (thiols) on gold polycrystalline films. Adv Mater Res 626:514–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morrison SR (1980) Electrochemistry at semiconductors and oxidized metal electrodes. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Levie R (1967) In: Delahay P (ed) Electrochemical responses of porous and rough electrodes, advances in electrochemistry and electrochemical engineering. Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cachet C, Wiart R (1984) The pore texture of zinc electrodes by impedance measurements. Electrochim Acta 29(2):145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Macdonald JR (1984) Note on the parameterization of the constant-phase admittance element. Solid State Ionics 13(2):147–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Orazem M, Tribollet B (2008) Methods for representing impedance. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New JerseyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sharifi-Viand A, Mahjani MG, Jafarian M (2012) Investigation of anomalous diffusion and multifractal dimensions in polypyrrole film. J Electroanal Chem 67:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Metzler R, Klafter J (2000) The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Phys Rep 339(1):1–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ampazis N, Perantonis SJ (2002) Two highly efficient second-order algorithms for training feedforward networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 13(5):1064–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nguyen D, Widrow B (2015) Improving the learning speed of 2-layer neural networks by choosing initial values of the adaptive weights. Int Joint Conference on Neural Networks11–357-363Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Coating Materials and EnvironmentUniversity M. BougaraBoumerdesAlgeria
  2. 2.Laboratory of Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of Science and Technology H. BoumedienneAlgiersAlgeria

Personalised recommendations