Advertisement

Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 73–79 | Cite as

A high-temperature electrochemical sensor based on CaZr0.95Sc0.05O3–δ for humidity analysis in oxidation atmospheres

  • Anatoly S. Kalyakin
  • Julia G. Lyagaeva
  • Alexander Yu. Chuikin
  • Alexander N. VolkovEmail author
  • Dmitry A. MedvedevEmail author
Original Paper
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

A way of in situ water vapor partial pressure determination in oxidizing atmospheres and high temperatures is proposed in this work, utilizing a new and simple amperometric-type sensor design made of ZrO2- and CaZrO3-based electrolytes. These electrolyte membranes allow conduction of oxygen-anions and protons, resulting in full water decomposition on account of the applied potential through an external electrical circuit. At a certain range of applied voltages, a limiting current condition is observed. By plotting the limiting current against temperature and water vapor partial pressure, the functional dependences are obtained, which could be used as the calibration curves for analytical reasons. The proper operation of the developed sensor is confirmed by changing water vapor partial pressures (0.003–0.110 atm) in air and temperatures (675–750 °C). It is found that the sensor’s reading is stable, reproducible, and corresponds to the theoretically predicted values, confirming the test success. The obtained results allow extending the field of possible applications of oxide materials with proton conduction nature.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

CaZrO3 Perovskite Humidity sensor Proton-conducting materials 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The characterization of materials was carried out at the Shared Access Center “Composition of Compounds” of the Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry (Yekaterinburg, Russia (http://www.ihte.uran.ru/?page_id=3142)). This work is supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Mega-grant, contract no. 14.Z50.31.0001).

References

  1. 1.
    Kochetova N, Animitsa I, Medvedev D, Demin A, Tsiakaras P (2016) Recent activity in the development of proton-conducting oxides for high-temperature applications. RSC Adv 6(77):73222–73268Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haugsrud R (2016) High temperature proton conductors – fundamentals and functionalities. Diffus Found 8:31–79Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yaroslavtsev AB (2016) Solid electrolytes: main prospects of research and development. Russ Chem Rev 85(11):1255–1276Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Medvedev DA, Lyagaeva JG, Gorbova EV, Demin AK, Tsiakaras P (2016) Advanced materials for SOFC application: strategies for the development of highly conductive and stable solid oxide proton electrolytes. Prog Mater Sci 75:38–79Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hossain S, Abdalla AM, Jamain SNB, Zaini JH, Azad AK (2017) A review on proton conducting electrolytes for clean energy and intermediate temperature-solid oxide fuel cells. Renew Sust Energ Rev 79:750–764Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sunarso J, Hashim SS, Zhu N, Zhou W (2017) Perovskite oxides applications in high temperature oxygen separation, solid oxide fuel cell and membrane reactor: a review. Prog Energy Combust Sci 61:57–77Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Danilov N, Lyagaeva J, Vdovin G, Medvedev D, Demin A, Tsiakaras P (2017) Electrochemical approach for analyzing electrolyte transport properties and their effect on protonic ceramic fuel cell performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 43:26874–26884Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu S, Chuang KT, Luo J-L (2016) Double-layered perovskite anode with in situ exsolution of a Co–Fe alloy to cogenerate ethylene and electricity in a proton-conducting ethane fuel cell. ACS Catal 6(2):760–768Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carpanese MP, Panizza M, Viviani M, Mercadelli E, Sanson A, Barbucci A (2015) Study of reversible SOFC/SOEC based on a mixed anionic-protonic conductor. J Appl Electrochem 45(7):657–665Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Danilov N, Lyagaeva J, Vdovin G, Pikalova E, Medvedev D (2018) Electricity/hydrogen conversion by the means of a protonic ceramic electrolysis cell with Nd2NiO4+δ-based oxygen electrode. Energy Convers Manag 172:129–137Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang S, Wen Y, J Zhang YL, Ye X, Zn W (2018) Electrochemical performance and stability of cobalt-free Ln1.2Sr0.8NiO4 (Ln = La and Pr) air electrodes for proton-conducting reversible solid oxide cells. Electrochim Acta 267:269–277Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vourros A, Kyriakou V, Garagounis I, Vasileiou E, Stoukides M (2017) Chemical reactors with high temperature proton conductors as a main component: Progress in the past decade. Solid State Ionics 306:76–81Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cardoso SP, Azenha IS, Lin Z, Portugal I, Rodrigues AE, Silva CM (2018) Inorganic membranes for hydrogren separation. Sep Purif Rev 47(3):229–266Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morejudo SH, Zanon R, Escolastico S, Yuste I, Malerød-Fjeld H, Vestre PK, Coors WG, Martínez A, Norby T, Serra JM, Kjølseth C (2016) Direct conversion of methane to aromatics in a catalytic co-ionic membrane reactor. Science 353(6299):563–566Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Volkov A, Gorbova E, Vylkov A, Medvedev D, Demin A, Tsiakaras P (2017) Design and applications of potentiometric sensors based on proton-conducting ceramic materials. A brief review. Sens Actuators B Chem 244:1004–1015Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duan C, Hook D, Chen Y, Tong J, O'Hayre R (2017) Zr and Y co-doped perovskite as a stable, high performance cathode for solid oxide fuel cells operating below 500 °C. Energy Environ Sci 10(1):176–182Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bae K, Jang DY, Choi HJ, Kim D, Hong J, Kim B-K, Lee J-H, Son J-W, Shim JH (2017) Demonstrating the potential of yttrium-doped barium zirconate electrolyte for high-performance fuel cells. Nat Commun 8:14553Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saini DS, Ghosh A, Tripathy S, Sharma SK, Kumar A, Bhattacharya D (2018) Improved conductivity of spark plasma sintered ho-substituted BaZrO3 electrolyte ceramics for IT-SOFCs. ACS Appl Energy Mater 1(7):3469–3478Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yajima T, Iwahara H, Uchida H (1991) Protonic and oxide ionic conduction in BaCeO3-based ceramics – effect of partial substitution for Ba in BaCe0.9O3−α with ca. Solid State Ionics 47(1-2):117–124Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang C, Zhao H (2010) Electrical conduction behavior of Sr substituted proton conductor Ba1−xSrxCe0.9Nd0.1O3−δ. Solid State Ionics 181(33-34):1478–1485Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lyagaeva J, Danilov N, Korona D, Farlenkov A, Medvedev D, Demin A, Animitsa I, Tsiakaras P (2017) Improved ceramic and electrical properties of CaZrO3-based proton-conducting materials prepared by a new convenient combustion synthesis method. Ceram Int 43(9):7184–7192Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gorelov VP, Balakireva VB, Kuz’min AV, Plaksin SV (2014) Electrical conductivity of CaZr1−x (x=0.01–0.20) in dry and humid air. Inorg Mater 50(5):495–502Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dunyushkina LA, Smirnov SV, Kuimov VM, Gorelov VP (2014) Electrical conductivity of CaZr0.9Y0.1O3−δ films deposited from liquid solutions. Int J Hydrog Energy 39(32):18385–18391Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Iwahara H, Uchida H, Kondo J (1983) Galvanic cell-type humidity sensor using high temperature-type proton conductive solid electrolyte. J Appl Electrochem 13(3):365–370Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katahira K, Matsumoto H, Iwahara H, Koide K, Iwamoto T (2000) A solid electrolyte steam sensor with an electrochemically supplied hydrogen standard using proton-conducting oxides. Sensors Actuators B Chem 67(1-2):189–193Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sammes N, Phillips R, Smirnova A (2004) Proton conductivity in stoichiometric and sub-stoichiometric yttrium doped SrCeO3 ceramic electrolytes. J Power Sources 134(2):153–159Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yajima T, Iwahara H (1991) CaZrO3-type hydrogen and steam sensors: trial fabrication and their characteristics. Sensors Actuators B Chem 5(1-4):145–147Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    André RS, Zanetti SM, Varela JA, Longo E (2014) Synthesis by a chemical method and characterization of CaZrO3 powders: potential application as humidity sensors. Ceram Int 40(10):16627–16634Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang J, Wen Z, Chi X, Han J, Wu X, Wen T-L (2012) Proton conducting CaZr0.9In0.1O3–δ ceramic membrane prepared by tape casting. Solid State Ionics 225:291–296Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dai L, Wang L, Shao G, Li Y (2012) A novel amperometric hydrogen sensor based on nano-structured ZnO sensing electrode and CaZr0.9In0.1O3−δ electrolyte. Sensors Actuators B Chem 173:85–92Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang D, Li SL, Li WJ, Li JG, Liu J, Xu T (2013) Studying on hot pressure casting process of CaZr0.9In0.1O3–α tubes for hydrogen sensor in aluminum melt. Adv Mater Res 706–708:301–303Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kondo M, Muroga T, Katahira K, Oshima T (2008) Application of proton conductors to hydrogen monitoring for liquid metal and molten salt systems. J Power Energy Syst 2(2):590–597Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Park CO, Akbar SA, Weppner W (2003) Ceramic electrolytes and electrochemical sensors. J Mater Sci 38(23):4639–4660Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gopel W, Reinhardt G, Rosch M (2000) Trends in the development of solid state amperometric and potentiometric high temperature sensors. Solid State Ionics 136–137:519–531Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Marrero TR, Mason EA (1972) Gaseous diffusion coefficients. J Phys Chem Ref Data 1(1):3–118Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gorelov VP, Balakireva VB, Kuz’min AV (2016) Partial conductivities in perovskites CaZr1–xScxO3–α (x = 0.03–0.20) in an oxidation atmosphere. Phys Solid State 58(1):12–18Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Løken A, Kjølseth C, Haugsrud R (2014) Electrical conductivity and TG-DSC study of hydration of Sc-doped CaSnO3 and CaZrO3. Solid State Ionics 267:61–67Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Huang W, Li Y, Li H, Ding Y, Ma B (2016) Preparation and ionic conduction of CaZr1xScxO3–α ceramics. Ceram Int 42(12):13404–13410Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Medvedev D, Kalyakin A, Volkov A, Demin A, Tsiakaras P (2017) Electrochemical moisture analysis by combining oxygen- and proton-conducting ceramic electrolytes. Electrochem Commun 76:55–58Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Electrochemical Devices Based on Solid Oxide Proton Electrolytes, Institute of High Temperature ElectrochemistryYekaterinburgRussia
  2. 2.Ural Federal UniversityYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations