Advertisement

Journal of Molecular Modeling

, 25:265 | Cite as

Theoretical study of gallium nitride nanocage as a carrier for 5-fluorouracil anticancer drug

  • Nuha WazzanEmail author
  • Kamal A. Soliman
  • W. S. Abdel Halim
Original Paper
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, the possible interactions between 5-fluorouracil (5FU) as an anticancer drug and gallium nitride (Ga12N12) nanocage (NC) in aqueous solution have been investigated using DFT/CPCM/B3LYP-D/6-31G(d,p) level of theory. Eleven different orientations were used to mimic the 5FU adsorbed on Ga12N12 (5FU@GaNNC). To investigate the interaction mechanism between the two components, the adsorption energies and thermodynamic parameters, the electronic properties such as the energies and orbitals distribution of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), the HOMO-LUMO energy gaps (Eg), the density of states (DOS), partial DOS (PDOS), and the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) have been calculated and compared. The natural bond orbitals (NBOs) and the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) calculations have been applied for understanding chemical interactions and chemical bonding. Additionally, some quantum molecular descriptors were calculated for the understanding of molecular reactivity. Main results revealed that (1) the key factor that leads to stabilization of the formed complex/s is the relocation of one of the H atoms that originally belonging to one of the N atoms in 5FU to one of the nearest Ga atoms in GaNNC and (2) the adsorption energies for the eleven adsorbed systems are relatively larger compared with reported similar systems indicating from a theoretical point of view, a probable chemisorption type of adsorption and the privilege of GaNNC as a carrier for 5FU drug.

Graphical abstract

Simulation of the most stable adsorbed system of 5-fluorouracil anticancer drug on Gallium nitride nanocage

Keywords

Drug delivery 5-fluorouracil drug Gallium nitride nanocage DFT calculations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Nuha Wazzan acknowledges King Abdulaziz University’s High-Performance Computing Center (Aziz Supercomputer) (http://hpc.kau.edu.sa) for supporting the computation for the work described in this paper.

Funding information

This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. 397-247-1440. The authors, therefore, gratefully acknowledge the DSR technical and financial support.

Supplementary material

894_2019_4147_MOESM1_ESM.docx (694 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 693 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Jahani M et al (2019) L-arginine/5-fluorouracil combination treatment approaches cells selectively: rescuing endothelial cells while killing MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells. Food Chem Toxicol 123:399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Milczarek M et al (2018) Autophagic cell death and premature senescence: new mechanism of 5-fluorouracil and sulforaphane synergistic anticancer effect in MDA-MB-231 triple negative breast cancer cell line. Food Chem Toxicol 111:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Metterle L, Nelson C, Patel N (2016) Intralesional 5-fluorouracil (FU) as a treatment for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC): a review. J Am Acad Dermatol 74(3):552–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leon O et al (2015) Phase I study of cetuximab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced anal cancer. Eur J Cancer 51(18):2740–2746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uetsuka H et al (2003) Inhibition of inducible NF-κB activity reduces chemoresistance to 5-fluorouracil in human stomach cancer cell line. Exp Cell Res 289(1):27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chandran SP et al (2017) Nano drug delivery strategy of 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Pract 4(2):45–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sauraj et al (2019) Lipophilic 5-fluorouracil prodrug encapsulated xylan-stearic acid conjugates nanoparticles for colon cancer therapy. Int J Biol Macromol 128:204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patra JK et al (2018) Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnol 16(1):71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ali Z, Savas B (2013) Stability of GaN nanocages. EPL (Europhys Lett) 103(1):16003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Javan MB et al (2016) A DFT study on the interaction between 5-fluorouracil and B12N12 nanocluster. RSC Adv 6(106):104513–104521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ravaei I, Haghighat M, Azami SM (2019) A DFT, AIM and NBO study of isoniazid drug delivery by MgO nanocage. Appl Surf Sci 469:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu Y-C et al (2004) Hollow boron nitride (BN) Nanocages and BN-Nanocage-encapsulated nanocrystals. Chem Eur J 10(15):3667–3672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bezi Javan M et al (2016) Interaction of B12N12 nano-cage with cysteine through various functionalities: a DFT study. Superlattice Microst 100:24–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hosseinian A et al (2017) A density functional theory study on the interaction between 5-fluorouracil drug and C24 fullerene. J Clust Sci 28(5):2681–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hazrati MK, Javanshir Z, Bagheri Z (2017) B24N24 fullerene as a carrier for 5-fluorouracil anti-cancer drug delivery: DFT studies. J Mol Graph Model 77:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frisch MJ (2009) Gaussian 09 programmer’s reference. GaussianGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dennington R, Keith T, Millam J (2009) GaussView. In: Mission S (ed) Semichem Inc: KSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhurko G, Zhurko D (2009) Chemcraft program, Academic version 1.8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baei MT, Tazikeh Lemeski E, Soltani A (2017) DFT study of the adsorption of H2O2 inside and outside Al12N12 nano-cage. Russ J Phys Chem A 91(8):1527–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baei MT et al (2014) A computational study of adenine, uracil, and cytosine adsorption upon AlN and BN nano-cages. Phys B Condens Matter 444:6–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shayan K, Nowroozi A (2018) Boron nitride nanotubes for delivery of 5-fluorouracil as anticancer drug: a theoretical study. Appl Surf Sci 428:500–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hazrati MK, Bagheri Z, Bodaghi A (2017) Application of C30B15N15 heterofullerene in the isoniazid drug delivery: DFT studies. Phys E: Low-Dimens Syst Nanostruct 89:72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98(7):5648–5652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B 37(2):785–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Duverger E et al (2014) Quantum study of boron nitride nanotubes functionalized with anticancer molecules. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16(34):18425–18432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boys SF, Bernardi F (1970) The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors. Mol Phys 19(4):553–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abdolahi N et al (2018) Adsorption of celecoxib on B12N12 fullerene: spectroscopic and DFT/TD-DFT study. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 204:348–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gorelsky SI (2015) Program for molecular orbital analysisGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gorelsky SI, Lever ABP (2001). J Organomet Chem 635:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Parr RG, Pearson RG (1983) Absolute hardness: companion parameter to absolute electronegativity. J Am Chem Soc 105(26):7512–7516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parr RG, Szentpály LV, Liu S (1999) Electrophilicity index. J Am Chem Soc 121(9):1922–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boese AD, Martin JML (2004) Development of density functionals for thermochemical kinetics. J Chem Phys 121(8):3405–3416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Takano Y, Houk KN (2005) Benchmarking the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM) for aqueous solvation free energies of neutral and ionic organic molecules. J Chem Theory Comput 1(1):70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Scalmani G, Frisch MJ (2010) Continuous surface charge polarizable continuum models of solvation. I. General formalism. J Chem Phys 132(11):114110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lu T, Chen F (2012) Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J Comput Chem 33(5):580–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Blicharska B, Kupka T (2002) Theoretical DFT and experimental NMR studies on uracil and 5-fluorouracil. J Mol Struct 613(1):153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beheshtian J, Ravaei I (2016) Hydrogen storage by BeO nano-cage: a DFT study. Appl Surf Sci 368:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xu H et al (2018) Theoretical study of boron nitride nanotubes as drug delivery vehicles of some anticancer drugs. Theor Chem Accounts 137(7):104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Soltani A et al (2015) A DFT study of 5-fluorouracil adsorption on the pure and doped BN nanotubes. J Phys Chem Solids 86:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vatanparast M, Shariatinia Z (2018) AlN and AlP doped graphene quantum dots as novel drug delivery systems for 5-fluorouracil drug: theoretical studies. J Fluor Chem 211:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pearson RG (1990) Hard and soft acids and bases—the evolution of a chemical concept. Coord Chem Rev 100:403–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vatanparast M, Shariatinia Z (2018) Computational studies on the doped graphene quantum dots as potential carriers in drug delivery systems for isoniazid drug. Struct Chem 29(5):1427–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Glendening ED, Landis CR, Weinhold F (2012) Natural bond orbital methods. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Comput Mol Sci 2(1):1–42Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mahdavifar Z, Poulad M (2014) Theoretical prediction of ozone sensing using pristine and endohedral metalloboron B80 fullerenes. Sensors Actuators B Chem 205:26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Du J et al (2016) The hydrogen storage on heptacoordinate carbon motif CTi72+. Int J Hydrog Energy 41(26):11301–11307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Soltani A et al (2017) Interaction of hydrogen with Pd- and co-decorated C24 fullerenes: density functional theory study. Synth Met 234:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Galy J et al (2017) Stereochemistry of nitrogen E lone pair in NH3E, NOFE, N2O3E2, AgNO2E, and NCl3E. C R Chim 20(4):446–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Soltani A et al (2018) Adsorption of chemical warfare agents over C24 fullerene: effects of decoration of cobalt. J Alloys Compd 735:2148–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vijayakumar B, Kannappan V, Sathyanarayanamoorthi V (2016) DFT analysis and spectral characteristics of celecoxib a potent COX-2 inhibitor. J Mol Struct 1121:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Soltani A et al (2018) Theoretical studies of hydrazine detection by pure and Al defected MgO nanotubes. Phys E: Low-Dimens Syst Nanostruct 97:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemistry Department, Faculty of ScienceKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceBenha UniversityBenhaEgypt
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt
  4. 4.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of TabukTabukKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations