Advertisement

Modeling cobalt–nitrogen compounds as catalysts for dissociation of H2O

  • Frank J. OwensEmail author
Original Paper
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

It has been shown experimentally that cobalt bonded to a nitrogen-doped graphene sheet can catalyze H removal from H2O. Density functional theory has been employed to obtain the minimum energy structure of H2O bonded to the cobalt–nitrogen graphene structure. The bond dissociation energy to remove an H atom from this structure was calculated to be 0.3 eV, which compared with the calculated value of 4.2 eV for the free H2O molecule, indicates this material can catalyze H2O dissociation. The agreement of the prediction of the theoretical model with the experimental observation lends support for the approach based on using bond dissociation energies. The model has been employed to show that a simpler structure, CN–Co, perhaps easier to synthesize, can also be an effective catalyst for the production of H from H2O.

Keywords

Density functional theory Bond dissociation energy Catalyst Cobalt bonded to N-doped graphene and CN 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Fei H et al (2015). Nat Commun 6:8668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang A, Zhang T (2016). Nat Energy 1:15019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoo JS, Abild-Pedersen F, Norkov JK, Studt JK (2014). ACS Catal 4:1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu LL, Chen C, Zhao L, Wang Y, Wang X (2017). Carbon 115:773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghuman KK, Yadau S, Singh CV (2015). J Phys Chem C119:6518Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiang K, Xu K, Zou S, Cai WB (2014). J Am Chem Soc 136:4861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yoo JS, Zhao Z, Norskov JK, Studt F (2015). ACS Catal 5:6579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Francis M (2002) Materials todayGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fazio G, Ferrighi L, Perilli D, Di Valentin C (2016). Int J Quantum Chem 116:1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halder A, Curtis LA, Fortunelli A, Vajada S (2018). J Chem Phys 148:110901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frisch MJ et al Gaussian 03, revision B.04, Pittsburg PA, Gaussian Inc.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller M, Owens FJ (2012). Comput Theor Chem 989:86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Irikura KK (1998). J Phys Chem 102:9031CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsHunter College of the City University of New YorkNew York CityUSA

Personalised recommendations