Advertisement

Theoretical investigation of the structure, detonation properties, and stability of bicyclo[3.2.1]octane derivatives

  • Mingran DuEmail author
  • Tifei Han
  • Feng Liu
  • Hongbo Wu
Original Paper
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

A series of nitro group and aza nitrogen atom derivatives, based on bicyclo[3.2.1]octane, were designed and studied by theoretical methods. The geometric structure calculations were performed at B3LYP/6-311G(d,p), B3P86/6-311G(d,p), B3LYP/6-31G(d), and B3PW91/6-31G(d,p) levels. The electrostatic potential analysis, heats of formation, densities, heats of sublimation, detonation performances, bond dissociation energies (BDEs), and impact sensitivities of the designed compounds were calculated by reasonable calculation methods to evaluate their comprehensive properties and establish the relationship between structure and performance. Results show that density and detonation properties always increase with the increasing number of nitro groups and aza nitrogen atoms. BDEs generally decrease with the increasing number of nitro groups. Except for BDEs of A9, B9, and D8, BDEs of all designed compounds are larger than 20 kcal mol–1 and meet the requirement for new high energy density compounds (HEDCs). Two theoretical prediction methods show all the designed compounds have an acceptable impact sensitivity. Detonation velocity and detonation pressure were predicted in the range of 5.24–9.59 km/s and 9.97–43.44 GPa, respectively. Eleven compounds have better detonation properties than HMX, and seven compounds meet the criteria for HEDCs. Taking thermal stability and impact sensitivity into consideration, four compounds (C9, E8, F8, and G7) may be considered as new potential HEDCs, and C9, E8, and F8 may have similar detonation properties to the famous CL-20.

Graphical abstract

Four new HEDCs with acceptable impact sensitivity (C9, E8 and F8 may have similar detonation properties to the famous CL-20)

Keywords

High-density energy compounds Density functional calculations Detonation properties Impact sensitivity Thermal stability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 5113402; 51604009) and Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant no. 1908085QA33).

Supplementary material

894_2019_4116_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12.3 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 12588 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Xiao HM, Xu XJ, Qiu L (2008) Theoretical design of high energy and density materials. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gao H, Shreeve JM (2011) Azole-based energetic salts. Chem Rev 111:7377–7436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang JY, Gong XD (2017) The effect of nitro groups on the structures and energetic properties of the derivatives composed of TATB and cubane. Struct Chem 28(3):645–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiao Y, Liu ZC, Zhu WH (2018) Searching for a new family of modified CL-20 cage derivatives with high energy and low sensitivity. Struct Chem 29(3):837–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rahm M, Dvinskikh SV, Furó I, Brinck T (2011) Experimental detection of trinitramide, N(NO2)3. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:1145–1148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu YQ, Huang FL, Zhang ZY (2012) Experiments and modeling of HMX granular explosives subjected to drop-weight impact. RSC Adv 2:4152–4163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chavez DE, Hiskey MA, Gilardi RD (2000) 3,3’-Azobis(6-amino-1,2,4,5-tetrazine):a novel high-nitrogen energetic material. Angew Chem Int Ed 39:1791–1793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chavez DE, Tappan BC, Mason BA, Parrish D (2009) Synthesis and energetic properties of bis-(triaminoguanidinium) 3,3’-dinitro-5,5’-azo-1,2,4-triazolate (TAGDNAT): a new high-nitrogen material. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 34:475–479Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang JY, Wang F, Gong XD (2013) A DFT study of cage compounds: 3, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12-hexanitro-3, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12-hexaazatetracyclo[5.5.1.12,6.04,9]dodecane and its derivatives as high energetic materials. Struct Chem 24(4):1339–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang J, Mitchell LA, Parrish DA, Shreeve JNM (2015) Enforced Layer-by-Layer Stacking of Energetic Salts towards High-Performance Insensitive Energetic Materials. J Am Chem Soc 137:10532–10535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keshavarz MH, Motamedoshariati H, Moghayadnia R, Nazari HR, Azarniamehraban J (2009) A new computer code to evaluate detonation performance of high explosives and their thermochemical properties, part I. J Hazard Mater 172:1218–1228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang RH, Guo Y, Sa RJ, Shreeve JM (2010) Nitroguanidine‐Fused Bicyclic Guanidinium Salts: A Family of High‐Density Energetic Materials. Chem –Eur J 16:8522–8529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xiang D, Zhu S, Qian H, Zhu WH (2019) Environmental degradability of 1,2,3,4-tetrazine-1,3-dioxide-functionalized FOX-7 derivatives with high energy and low sensitivity: a computational evaluation. Struct Chem 30:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang F, Wang GX, Du HC, Zhang JY, Gong XD (2011) Theoretical studies on the heats of formation, detonation properties, and pyrolysis mechanisms of energetic cyclic nitramines. J Phys Chem A 115:13858–13864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jin XH, Hu BC, Lu W, Gao SJ, Liu ZL, Lv CX (2014) Theoretical study on a novel high-energy density material 4,6,10,12-tetranitro-5,11-bis(nitroimino)-2,8-dioxa-4,6,10,12-tetraaza-tricyclo[7,3,0,03,7] dodecane. RSC Adv 4:6471–6477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang CC, Zhu WH, Xiao HM (2011) Density functional theory studies of energetic nitrogen-rich derivatives of substituted carbon-bridged diiminotetrazoles. Comput Theor Chem 967:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Qiu L, Xiao HM, Gong XD, Ju XH, Zhu WH (2006) Theoretical studies on the structures, thermodynamic properties, detonation properties, and pyrolysis mechanisms of spiro nitramines. J Phys Chem A 110:3797–3807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Joo YH, Twamley B, Garg S, Shreeve JM (2008) Energetic nitrogen-rich derivatives of 1,5-diaminotetrazole. Angew Chem Int Ed 47:6236–6239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang XW, Zhu WH, Xiao HM (2010) Comparative theoretical studies of energetic substituted carbon- and nitrogen-bridged difurazans. J Phys Chem A 114:603–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang JW, Du HC, Wang F, Gong XD, Huang YS (2011) DFT studies on a high energy density cage compound 4-trinitroethyl-2,6,8,10,12-pentanitrohezaazaisowurtzitane. J Phys Chem A 115:6617–6621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhu WH, Zhang CC, Wei T, Xiao HM (2011) Theoretical studies of furoxan-based energetic nitrogen-rich compounds. Struct Chem 22:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lai WP, Lian P, Yu T, Chang HB, Xue YQ (2011) Design and density functional theoretical study of three novel pyrazine-based high-energy density compounds. Comput Theor Chem 963:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pan Y, Li JS, Cheng BB, Zhu WH, Xiao HM (2012) Computational studies on the heats of formation, energetic properties, and thermal stability of energetic nitrogen-rich furazano[3,4-b]pyrazine-based derivatives. Comput Theor Chem 992:110–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhu WH, Yan QL, Li JS, Cheng BB, Shao YL, Xia XL, Xiao HM (2012) Prediction of the properties and thermodynamics of formation for energetic nitrogen-rich salts composed of triaminoguanidinium cation and 5-nitroiminotetrazolate-based anions. J Comput Chem 33:1781–1789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Du MR, Wang XG, Guo ZR (2016) Theoretical Design of Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane Derivatives for High-Energy Density Compounds with Low Impact Sensitivity. Comput Theor Chem 1095:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Du MR (2018) Computational study of the structure and properties of bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane derivatives for new high-energy density compounds with low impact sensitivity. J Mol Model 24(1):17Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JAJ, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2013) Gaussian 09, revision D.01. Gaussian, Inc., WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li XH, Zhang RZ, Zhang XZ (2010) Computational study of imidazole derivative as high energetic materials. J Hazard Mater 183:622–631Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zamani M, Keshavarz MH (2015) New NHNO2 substituted borazine-based energetic materials with high detonation performance. Compt Mater Sci 97:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yu Q, Wang Z, Yang H, Wu B, Lin Q, Ju X, Lu C, Cheng G (2015) N-Trinitroethyl-substituted azoxyfurazan: high detonation performance energetic materials. RSC Adv 5:27305–27312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang GX, Shi CH, Gong XD, Xiao HM (2009) Theoretical investigation on structures, densities, detonation properties, and the pyrolysis mechanism of the derivatives of HNS. J Phys Chem A 113:1318–1326Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fan XW, Ju XH, Xiao HM, Qiu L (2006) Theoretical studies on heats of formation, group interactions, and bond dissociation energies in neopentyl difluoroamino compounds. J Mol Struct( THEOCHEM) 801:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lide DR (2003-2004) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Curtiss LA, Redfern PC, Raghavachari K (2007) Gaussian-4 theory. J Chem Phys 126:084108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bulat FA, Toro-Labbé A, Brinck T, Murray JS, Politzer P (2010) Quantitative analysis of molecular surfaces: areas, volumes, electrostatic potentials and average local ionization energies. J Mol Model 16:1679–1691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Politzer P, Murray JS (2001) Computational prediction of condensed phase properties from statistical characterization of molecular surface electrostatic potentials. Fluid Phase Equilib 185:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Byrd EFC, Rice BM (2006) Improved prediction of heats of formation of energetic materials using quantum mechanical calculations. J Phys Chem A 110:1005–1013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Politzer P, Martinez J, Murray JS, Concha MC, Toro-Labbé A (2009) An electrostatic interaction correction for improved crystal density prediction. Mol Phys 107:2095–2101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kamlet MJ, Jacobs SJ (1968) Chemistry of detonations. I. A simple method for calculating detonation properties of C–H–N–O explosives. J Chem Phys 48:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Politzer P, Murray JS (2014) Impact sensitivity and crystal lattice compressibility/free space. J Mol Model 20:2223–2230Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mathieu D (2013) Toward a Physically Based Quantitative Modeling of Impact Sensitivities. J Phys Chem A 117:2253–2259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mathieu D, Alaime T (2014) Predicting Impact Sensitivities of Nitro Compounds on the Basis of a Semi-empirical Rate Constant. J Phys Chem A 118:9720–9726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mathieu D, Alaime T (2015) Impact sensitivities of energetic materials: Exploring the limitations of a model based only on structural formulas. J Mol Graphics Modell 62:81–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mathieu D (2016) Physics-Based Modeling of Chemical Hazards in a Regulatory Framework: Comparison with Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) Methods for Impact Sensitivities. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:7569–7577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mathieu D (2017) Sensitivity of Energetic Materials: Theoretical Relationships to Detonation Performance and Molecular Structure. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:8191–8201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang R, Jiang J, Pan Y, Cao H, Cui Y (2009) Prediction of Impact Sensitivity of Nitro Energetic Compounds by Neural Network Based on Electrotopological-State Indicies. J Hazard Mater 166:155–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Xu J, Zhu L, Fang D, Wang L, Xiao S, Liu L, Xu W (2012) QSPR Studies of Impact Sensitivity of Nitro Energetic Compounds Using Three-Dimensional Descriptors. J Mol Graphic Model 36:10–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Prana V, Fayet G, Rotureau P, Adamo C (2012) Development of validated QSPR models for impact sensitivity of nitroaliphatic compounds. J Hazard Mater 235–236:169–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fayet G, Rotureau P (2014) Development of simple QSPR models for the impact sensitivity of nitramines. J Loss Prev Process Ind 30:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhang C (2009) Review of the Establishment of Nitro Charge Method and its Application. J Hazard Mater 161:21–28Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bondarchuk SV (2017) Impact sensitivity of crystalline phenyl diazonium salts: A first‐principles study of solidstate properties determining the phenomenon. Int J Quantum Chem 117:e25430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Keshavarz MH (2013) A New General Correlation for Predicting Impact Sensitivity of Energetic Compounds. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 38:754–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Keshavarz MH, Motamedoshariati H, Moghayadnia R, Ghanbarzadeh M (2014) Prediction of Sensitivity of Energetic Compounds with a New Computer Code. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 39:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Keshavarz MH, Pouretedal HR, Semnani A (2007) Novel correlation for predicting impact sensitivity of nitroheterocyclic energetic molecules. J Hazard Mater 141:803–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zeman S, Jungoá M (2016) Sensitivity and Performance of Energetic Materials. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 41:426–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Scott A, Radom L (1996) Harmonic Vibrational Frequencies: An Evaluation of Hartree−Fock, Møller−Plesset, Quadratic Configuration Interaction, Density Functional Theory, and Semiempirical Scale Factors. J Phys Chem 100:16502–16513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Owens FJ (1996) Calculation of energy barriers for bond rupture in some energetic molecules. J Mol Struct (Theochem) 370:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zhang J, Xiao HM (2002) Computational studies on the infrared vibrational spectra, thermodynamic properties, detonation properties, and pyrolysis mechanism of octanitrocubane. J Chem Phys 116:10674–10683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chung G, Schmidt MW, Gordon MS (2000) An Ab initio study of potential energy surfaces for N Isomers. J Phys Chem A 104:5647–5650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Akhavan J (2011) The chemistry of explosives, 3rd edn., Royal Society of Chemistry, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical EngineeringAnhui University of Science and TechnologyHuainanChina

Personalised recommendations