Advertisement

Theoretical investigation into the influence of molar ratio on mixture system: α, γ, δ-HMX molecules coexisting with β-HMX crystal

  • Ye-Bai Shi
  • Liang-Fei Bai
  • Ben-Qiong Liu
  • Guan-Yun Yan
  • Jian-Ming Song
  • Chao-Qiang Huang
  • Guang-Ai Sun
  • Jian Gong
  • Xin JuEmail author
Original Paper
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was conducted to research the effect of molar ratios for α/β-HMX, γ/β-HMX, and δ/β-HMX(octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine) mixture systems on thermal stability, sensitivity, and mechanical properties of explosives, and the computing models were established by Materials Studio (MS). The binding energies, the maximum trigger bond length (LN–NO2), cohesive energy density as well as mechanical properties of the mixture systems and the pure β-HMX crystal were obtained and contrasted. The results demonstrate that the molar ratios have great influence on the binding capacity of molecules between α, γ, δ-HMX, and β-HMX in the mixture systems. The binding energies decrease with the increase of molecular molar ratio and have the maximum values at the 1:1 M ratio. The maximum trigger bond length does not change apparently after mixing, while the cohesive energy density (CED) increases as the molar ratio increases but are all smaller than the pure β-HMX crystal, demonstrating that the sensitivity of the mixture systems increases. The mechanical properties decrease after mixture, which illustrates that the mechanical properties of the pure crystal are superior to the mixture systems.

Keywords

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation Molar ratio Mixture system HMX 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant No.U1730244, No.11775195, and No.11405152. We also would like to acknowledge the Project from the China Academy of Engineering Physics No.ESHT-KY-2015-71. The calculation resources in the Simulation Center of CAEP are appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu J, Hao G, Rong Y, Xiao L, Jiang W, Li F, Jing C, Gao H, Chen T, Ke X (2017) Application and properties of nanometric HMX in PBX. Combust Explos Shock Waves 53:744–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xiong SL, Chen SS, Jin SH, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Li LJ (2017) Molecular dynamic simulations on TKX-50/HMX cocrystal. RSC Adv 7:6795–6799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Myint PC, Nichols AL (2017) Thermodynamics of HMX polymorphs and HMX/RDX mixtures. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:387–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li YX, Chen SS, Ren FD, Jin SH (2017) Theoretical insight into the influence of molecular ratio on the stability, mechanical property, solvent effect and cooperativity effect of HMX/DMI cocrystal explosive - theoretical insight into the influence of molecular ratio on the stability, mechanical property, solvent effect and cooperativity effect of HMX/DMI cocrystal explosive. Chin J Struct Chem 36:562–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu YZ, Lai WP, Ma YD, Yu T, Kang Y, Ge ZX (2017) Face-dependent solvent adsorption: a comparative study on the interfaces of HMX crystal with three solvents. (Report) J Phys Chem B 121:7140–7146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Song KP, Ren FD, Zhang SH, Shi WJ (2016) Theoretical insights into the stabilities, detonation performance, and electrostatic potentials of cocrystals containing α- or β-HMX and TATB, FOX-7, NTO, or DMF in various molar ratios. J Mol Model 22:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang X, Xiao J (2017) Molecular dynamics simulation studies of the ε-CL-20/HMX co-crystal-based PBXs with HTPB. Struct Chem 28:1645–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun T, Xiao JJ, Liu Q, Zhao F, Xiao HM (2014) Comparative study on structure, energetic and mechanical properties of a ε-CL-20/HMX cocrystal and its composite with molecular dynamics simulation. J Mater Chem A 2:13898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yan T, Wang JH, Liu YC, Zhao J, Yuan JM, Guo JH (2015) Growth and morphology of 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraazacy-clooct ane (HMX) crystal. J Cryst Growth 430:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hang GY, Yu WL, Wang T, Li Z (2016) Determination of the effects of water adsorption on the sensitivity and detonation performance of the explosive JOB-9003 by molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Model 22:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guo YN, Wang YL (2017) Effects of air humidity on properties of JO-9159 explosive by molecular dynamics simulation. Key Eng Mater 727-727:455–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Han G, Li QF, Gou RJ, Zhang SH, Ren FD, Wang L, Guan R (2017) Growth morphology of CL-20/HMX cocrystal explosive: insights from solvent behavior under different temperatures. J Mol Model 23:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cady HH, Larson AC, Cromer DT (1963) The crystal structure of α-HMX and a refinement of the structure of β-HMX. Acta Cryst 16:617–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choi CS, Boutin HP (1970) A study of the crystal structure of β-cyclotetramethylene tetranitramine by neutron diffraction. Acta Crystallogr Sect B 26:1235–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gitany R, Anderson GD, McEwen RS (1974) The crystal and molecular structure of pseudoivalin bromoacetate. Acta Crystallogr Sect B 30:1900–1904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Main P, Cobbledick RE, Small RWH (1985) Structure of the fourth form of 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraazacyclooctane (γ-HMX), 2C4H8N8O8.0.5H2O. Acta rystallogr Sect C Crysta Struct Commun 41:1351–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Han G, Gou RJ, Ren FD, Zhang SH, Wu CL, Zhu SF (2017) Theoretical investigation into the influence of molar ratio on binding energy, mechanical property and detonation performance of 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazacyclo octane (HMX)/1-methyl-4,5-dinitroimidazole (MDNI) cocrystal explosive. Comput Theor Chem 1109:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sun H (1998) COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications - overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. J Phys Chem B 102:7338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McQuaid MJ, Sun H, Rigby D (2004) Development and validation of COMPASS force field parameters for molecules with aliphatic azide chains. J Comput Chem 25:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li YX, Chen SS, Ren FD (2015) Theoretical insights into the structures and mechanical properties of HMX/NQ cocrystal explosives and their complexes, and the influence of molecular ratios on their bonding energies. J Mol Model 21:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wei YJ, Ren FD, Shi WJ, Zhao Q (2016) Theoretical insight into the influences of molecular ratios on stabilities and mechanical properties, solvent effect of HMX/FOX-7 cocrystal explosive. J Energ Mater 34:426–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Qiu L, Xiao HM (2009) Molecular dynamics study of binding energies, mechanical properties, and detonation performances of bicyclo-HMX-based PBXs. J Hazard Mater 164:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Andersen HC (1980) Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J Chem Phys 72:2384–2393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, Dinola A, Haak JR (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81:3684–3690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Allen MP (1987) Computer simulation of liquids. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ewald PP (1921) Calculation of optic and electrostatic lattice potential. Ann Phys 64:253–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Palmer SJP, Field JE, Huntley JM (1993) Deformation, strengths and strains to failure of polymer bonded explosives. Proc Royal Soc: Math Phys Sci (1990–1995) 440:399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xiao JJ (2013) Molecular dynamics of energetic materials. Science Press Beijing, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xiao JJ, Wang WR, Chen J, Ji GF, Zhu W, Xiao HM (2012) Study on structure, sensitivity and mechanical properties of HMX and HMX-based PBXs with molecular dynamics simulation. Comput Theor Chem 999:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pospíšil M, Vávra P, Concha M, Murray J, Politzer P (2010) A possible crystal volume factor in the impact sensitivities of some energetic compounds. J Mol Model 16:895–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu Y, Gong X, Wang L, Wang G, Xiao H (2011) Substituent effects on the properties related to detonation performance and sensitivity for 2,2′,4,4′,6,6′-hexanitroazobenzene derivatives. J Phys Chem A 115:1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weiner JH, Milstein F (1984) Statistical mechanics of elasticity. J Appl Mech 51:707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wu JL (1993) Mechanics of elasticity. Tongji University Press, ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pugh SF (1954) XCII. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals. London, Edinburgh, Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 45:823–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Watt JP, Davies GF, O’Connell RJ (1976) The elastic properties of composite materials. Rev Geophys 14:541–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Grimme S (2006) Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J Comput Chem 27:1787–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Parrinello M, Rahman A (1982) Strain fluctuations and elastic constants. J Chem Phys 76:2662–2666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xu XJ, Xiao HM, Xiao JJ, Zhu W, Huang H, Li JL (2006) Molecular dynamics simulations for pure epsi-CL-20 and epsi-Cl-20-based PBXs. J Phys Chem B 110:7203–7207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pettifor DG (1992) Theoretical predictions of structure and related properties of intermetallics. Mater Sci Technol 8:345–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hang GY, Yu WL, Wang T, Wang JT, Li Z (2017) Theoretical insights into the effects of molar ratios on stabilities, mechanical properties, and detonation performance of CL-20/HMX cocrystal explosives by molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Model 23:30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Neutron Physics and Institute of Nuclear Physics and ChemistryChina Academy of Engineering Physics (CAEP)MianyangChina

Personalised recommendations