Density functional calculations of nickel, palladium and cadmium adsorption onto (10,0) single-walled carbon nanotube

  • Ali Aghashiri
  • Forough Kalantari FotoohEmail author
  • Saeedeh Hashemian
Original Paper


Adsorption of three heavy metals (Ni, Pd, Cd) onto (10,0) single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) was investigated using density functional theory (DFT). Metals were adsorbed to both inside and outside of SWCNT and their structures and electronic properties [e.g., band structures and density of states (DOS)] were calculated and compared. The effects of substituting one carbon atom of the nanotube with these metals were also investigated. Formation energy results showed that adsorption inside and outside the nanotube is energetically favored. Significant changes were observed in the electronic properties of SWCNT after Ni and Pd adsorptions, and the nanotube changes from being a semi-conductor to a metallic conductor. However, the conductivity did not change markedly after Cd adsorption, indicating its physical adsorption to the nanotube. Spin polarized calculations showed that nickel adsorption inside and outside SWCNT induces magnetization of the system. Different electronic properties were obtained after adsorption of Pd atoms to different sides of SWCNT. Partial DOS were also applied to interpret the changes in electronic properties more precisely.


Density functional theory Carbon nanotube Heavy metals Band structure Density of states Adsorption Doping 



  1. 1.
    Lu C, Chiu H (2006) Adsorption of zinc(II) from water with purified carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng Sci 61(4):1138–1145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou Q, Wang C, Fu Z, Zhang H, Tang Y (2014) Adsorption of formaldehyde molecule on Al-doped vacancy-defected single-walled carbon nanotubes: a theoretical study. Comput Mater Sci 82:337–344. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baghemiyani TA, Kalantari Fotooh F (2017) Interaction of Lead metal with single walled AlN nanotube: a computational study. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 27(5):1274–1280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bastos M, Camps I (2014) First-principles calculations of nickel, cadmium, and lead adsorption on a single-walled (10,0) carbon nanotube. J Mol Model 20(2):1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhuang HL, Zheng GP, Soh AK (2008) Interactions between transition metals and defective carbon nanotubes. Comput Mater Sci 43(4):823–828. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Du XJ, Zhang JM, Wang SF, Xu KW, Ji V (2009) First-principle study on energetics and electronic structure of a single copper atomic chain bound in carbon nanotube. Eur Phys J B 72(1):119. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamadanian M, Tavangar Z, Noori B (2014) Modification of conductive properties of (10,0) zigzag single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) by alkali metals absorption. J Mol Struct 1076:49–54. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lvova L, Mastroianni M, Pomarico G, Santonico M, Pennazza G, Di Natale C, Paolesse R, D’Amico A (2012) Carbon nanotubes modified with porphyrin units for gaseous phase chemical sensing. Sensors Actuators B Chem 170:163–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Talla JA (2012) First principles modeling of boron-doped carbon nanotube sensors. Physica B 407(6):966–970. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dhall S, Jaggi N, Nathawat R (2013) Functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes based hydrogen gas sensor. Sens Actuators, A 201:321–327. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamadanian M, Fotooh FK (2014) Density functional study of Al/N co-doped (10,0) zigzag single-walled carbon nanotubes as CO sensor. Comput Mater Sci 82:497–502. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nguyen TTH, Le VK, Le Minh C, Nguyen NH (2017) A theoretical study of carbon dioxide adsorption and activation on metal-doped (Fe, co, Ni) carbon nanotube. Comput Theor Chem 1100:46–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larijani MM, Safa S (2014) Increase of hydrogen storage capacity of CNTs by using transition metal, metal oxide-CNT nanocomposites. Acta Phys Pol A 126(3):732–736. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rossetti I, Ramis G, Gallo A, Di Michele A (2015) Hydrogen storage over metal-doped activated carbon. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(24):7609–7616. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wanno B, Tabtimsai C (2014) A DFT investigation of CO adsorption on VIIIB transition metal-doped graphene sheets. Superlattice Microst 67:110–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kong H, Li H-Y, Lin G-D, Zhang H-B (2011) Pd-decorated CNT-promoted Pd-Ga2O3 catalyst for hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. Catal Lett 141:886. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liang X, Xie J, Liu Z (2015) A novel Pd-decorated carbon nanotubes-promoted Pd-ZnO catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Catal Lett 145(5):1138–1147. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh AK, Kumar V, Briere TM, Kawazoe Y (2002) Cluster assembled metal encapsulated thin nanotubes of silicon. Nano Lett 2(11):1243–1248. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang Q, Liu YJ, Zhao JX (2013) Theoretical study on the encapsulation of Pd3-based transition metal clusters inside boron nitride nanotubes. J Mol Model 19(3):1143–1151. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim H-S, Lee H, Han K-S, Kim J-H, Song M-S, Park M-S, Lee J-Y, Kang J-K (2005) Hydrogen storage in Ni nanoparticle-dispersed multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 109(18):8983–8986. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jin L, Zhao X, Qian X, Dong M (2018) Nickel nanoparticles encapsulated in porous carbon and carbon nanotube hybrids from bimetallic metal-organic-frameworks for highly efficient adsorption of dyes. J Colloid Interface Sci 509:245–253. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Paolo G, Stefano B, Nicola B, Matteo C, Roberto C, Carlo C, Davide C, Guido LC, Matteo C, Ismaila D, Andrea Dal C, Stefano de G, Stefano F, Guido F, Ralph G, Uwe G, Christos G, Anton K, Michele L, Layla M-S, Nicola M, Francesco M, Riccardo M, Stefano P, Alfredo P, Lorenzo P, Carlo S, Sandro S, Gabriele S, Ari PS, Alexander S, Paolo U, Renata MW (2009) QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J Phys Condens Matter 21(39):395502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perdew JP, Wang Y (1992) Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 45(23):13244–13249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hamann DR, Schlüter M, Chiang C (1979) Norm-conserving pseudopotentials. Phys Rev Lett 43(20):1494–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ahmadi A, Beheshtian J, Hadipour NL (2011) Interaction of NH3 with aluminum nitride nanotube: electrostatic vs. covalent. Physica E 43(9):1717–1719. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Durgun E, Dag S, Ciraci S, Gülseren O (2004) Energetics and electronic structures of individual atoms adsorbed on carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 108(2):575–582. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Yazd BranchIslamic Azad UniversityYazdIran

Personalised recommendations