Adsorption behavior of mercuric oxide clusters on activated carbon and the effect of SO2 on this adsorption: a theoretical investigation
- 54 Downloads
The release of mercury (Hg) species from coal-fired power plants has attracted increasing concern, and the development of an efficient and economical method to control Hg species emission from such plants is urgently required. Activated carbon is a compelling sorbent for the elimination of mercury species from flue gas, but the adsorption mechanism of mercuric oxide clusters on carbonaceous materials is still unclear. Therefore, the adsorption characteristics of mercuric oxide clusters on activated carbon were investigated systematically utilizing density functional theory in this work. It was found that mercuric oxide clusters are chemically adsorbed on activated carbon, and that the pre-adsorption of SO2 on the activated carbon leads to complicated mercuric oxide cluster adsorption behavior due to an irregular distribution of the electrostatic potential on the surface of the carbonaceous material. Thermodynamic analysis indicated that the adsorption energy of SO2 on activated carbon is lower than that of mercuric oxide clusters in the temperature range 298.15–1000 K. Competitive adsorption analysis suggested that mercuric oxide clusters are at least 108.11 times more likely than SO2 to be adsorbed on activated carbon.
KeywordsActivated carbon Mercuric oxide clusters SO2 Electrostatic potential Competitive adsorption
This work was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (2182066), the Natural Science Foundation of Heibei Province (B2018502067), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JB2015RCY03 and 2017XS121). The provision of access to TianHe-2 supercomputer computational resources of the Lvliang Supercomputer Center is acknowledged.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
- 12.Chu P, Laudal D, Brickett L, Lee C. Power plant evaluation of the effect of SCR technology on mercury. Conference Power plant evaluation of the effect of SCR technology on mercury. p 19–22Google Scholar
- 14.Feeley TJ, Brickett LA, O'Palko BA, Murphy JT (2010) Field testing of mercury control technologies for coal-fired power plants. National Energy Technology Laboratory (DOE), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 15.Li H, Wu CY, Li Y, Zhang J (2012) Superior activity of MnOx–CeO2/TiO2 catalyst for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury at low flue gas temperatures. Appl Catal B Environ 111(3):381–388Google Scholar
- 17.Li J, Yan N, Qu Z, Qiao S, Yang S, Guo Y, et al. (2009) Catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury over the modified catalyst Mn/α-Al2O3 at lower temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 44(1):426–431Google Scholar
- 23.Norell M (2012) Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired electric utility boilers: interim report including errata dated 3-21-02. US EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 30.Frisch MJ, Trucks G, Schlegel HB, Scuseria G, Robb M, Cheeseman J, et al. (2009) Gaussian 09, revision D.01, vol 27. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, p 34Google Scholar
- 32.Neese F (2012) The ORCA program system. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 2(1):73–78Google Scholar
- 39.Gao Z, Yang W (2016) Effects of CO/CO2/NO on elemental lead adsorption on carbonaceous surfaces. J Mol Model 22(7):166Google Scholar
- 40.Yang Y, Jing L, Zhang B, Feng L (2017) Mechanistic studies of mercury adsorption and oxidation by oxygen over spinel-type MnFe2O4. J Hazard Mater 321:154–161Google Scholar
- 43.Yang W, Gao Z, Liu X, Ding X, Yan W (2019) The adsorption characteristics of As2O3, Pb0, PbO and PbCl2 on single atom iron adsorbent with graphene-based substrates. Chem Eng J 361:304–313Google Scholar
- 51.Olson E, Laumb J, Benson S, Dunham G, Sharma R, Mibeck B, et al. (2003) An improved model for flue gas-mercury interactions on activated carbons. In: Proceedings of 2003 Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium. Energy & Environmental Research Center, Grand Forks, pp 19–22Google Scholar
- 60.Park J-H, Ahn J-W, Kim K-H, Son Y-S (2019) Historic and futuristic review of electron beam technology for the treatment of SO2 and NOx in flue gas. Chem Eng J 355:351–366Google Scholar