Structure and function prediction of arsenate reductase from Deinococcus indicus DR1
Arsenic prevalence in the environment impelled many organisms to develop resistance over the course of evolution. Tolerance to arsenic, either as the pentavalent [As(V)] form or the trivalent form [As(III)], by bacteria has been well studied in prokaryotes, and the mechanism of action is well defined. However, in the rod-shaped arsenic tolerant Deinococcus indicus DR1, the key enzyme, arsenate reductase (ArsC) has not been well studied. ArsC of D. indicus belongs to the Grx-linked prokaryotic arsenate reductase family. While it shares homology with the well-studied ArsC of Escherichia coli having a catalytic cysteine (Cys 12) and arginine triad (Arg 60, 94, and 107), the active site of D.indicus ArsC contains four residues Glu 9, Asp 53, Arg 86, and Glu 100, and with complete absence of structurally equivalent residue for crucial Cys 12. Here, we report that the mechanism of action of ArsC of D. indicus is different as a result of convergent evolution and most likely able to detoxify As(V) using a mix of positively- and negatively-charged residues in its active site, unlike the residues of E. coli. This suggests toward the possibility of an alternative mechanism of As (V) degradation in bacteria.
KeywordsArsenate reductase Deinococcus indicus DR1 Mechanism of action Arsenic tolerance Molecular modeling
PAS, VA, and RMY acknowledge Jaypee University of Information Technology for providing research facilities to conduct this study. RP acknowledges Shiv Nadar University for providing research facilities and DC is supported by a doctoral research fellowship from Shiv Nadar University.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Naujokas MF, Anderson B, Ahsan H, Aposhian HV, Graziano JH, Thompson C, Suk WA (2013) The broad scope of health effects from chronic arsenic exposure: update on a worldwide public health problem. Environ Health Perspect 121(3):295–302. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205875 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 10.Klaassen CD, Casarett LJ, Doull J (2013) Casarett and Doull's toxicology: the basic science of poisons, vol xiii, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 19.Chauhan D, Srivastava PA, Yennamalli RM, Priyadarshini R (2017) Draft genome sequence of Deinococcus indicus DR1, a novel strain isolated from a freshwater wetland. Genome Announce 5(31). https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00754-17
- 26.Pronk S, Pall S, Schulz R, Larsson P, Bjelkmar P, Apostolov R, Shirts MR, Smith JC, Kasson PM, van der Spoel D, Hess B, Lindahl E (2013) GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29(7):845–854. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 28.Jabeen A, Mohamedali A, Ranganathan S (2019) Protocol for protein structure modelling. In: Ranganathan S, Gribskov M, Nakai K, Schönbach C (eds) Encyclopedia of bioinformatics and computational biology. Academic, Oxford, pp 252–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20477-9
- 29.Dwyer DS (2003) Molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations of membrane transporter proteins. In: Yan Q (ed) Membrane transporters: methods and protocols. Humana, Totowa, pp 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-387-9:335
- 30.Kokabu Y, Ikeguchi M (2013) Molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations of recombinase Rad51. Biophys J 104(7):1556–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.02.014
- 31.Zimmermann MT, Urrutia R, Oliver GR, Blackburn PR, Cousin MA, Bozeck NJ, Klee EW (2017) Molecular modeling and molecular dynamic simulation of the effects of variants in the TGFBR2 kinase domain as a paradigm for interpretation of variants obtained by next generation sequencing. PLoS One 12(2):e0170822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170822 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 38.Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije JGEM (1997) LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 18(12):1463–1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/(Sici)1096-987x(199709)18:12<1463::Aid-Jcc4>3.0.Co;2-H CrossRefGoogle Scholar