Advertisement

Pathways: augmenting interoperability across scholarly repositories

  • Simeon Warner
  • Jeroen Bekaert
  • Carl Lagoze
  • Xiaoming Liu
  • Sandy Payette
  • Herbert Van de Warner
REGULAR PAPER

Abstract

In the emerging eScience environment, repositories of papers, datasets, software, etc., should be the foundation of a global and natively-digital scholarly communications system. The current infrastructure falls far short of this goal. Cross-repository interoperability must be augmented to support the many workflows and value-chains involved in scholarly communication. This will not be achieved through the promotion of single repository architecture or content representation, but instead requires an interoperability framework to connect the many heterogeneous systems that will exist.

We present a simple data model and service architecture that augments repository interoperability to enable scholarly value-chains to be implemented. We describe an experiment that demonstrates how the proposed infrastructure can be deployed to implement the workflow involved in the creation of an overlay journal over several different repository systems (Fedora, aDORe, DSpace and arXiv).

Keywords

Digital Object Resource Description Framework Service Request Scholarly Communication Semantic Registry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams, S.L., Seaman, D.: Towards a global digital format registry. In 69th IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) General Conference and Council, Berlin, Germany, August 2003. http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla69/papers/128e-Abrams_Seaman.pdf [Accessed 29 June 2006]Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amazon S3 - Simple Storage Service. http://aws.amazon.com/s3 [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Atom Publishing Protocol. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt [Accessed 30 June 2006]Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised), W3C Recommendation, February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/ [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bekaert, J.: Standards-Based Interfaces for Harvesting and Obtaining Assets from Digital Repositories. PhD thesis, Ghent University, Belgium, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/4833Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bekaert, J., Van de Sompel, H.: A Standards-based Solution for the Accurate Transfer of Digital Assets. D-Lib Magazine, 11(6), June 2005. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june05/bekaert/06bekaert.htmlGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bekaert, J., Hochstenbach, P., Balakireva, L., Van de Sompel, H.: Using MPEG-21 DIP and NISO OpenURL for the Dynamic Dissemination of Complex Digital Objects in the Los Alamos National Laboratory Digital Library. D-Lib Magazine, 10(2), February 2004. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february04/bekaert/02bekaert.htmlGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bekaert, J., Hochstenbach, P., Van de Sompel, H.: Using MPEG-21 DIDL to Represent Complex Digital Objects in the Los Alamos National Laboratory Digital Library. D-Lib Magazine, 9(11), 2005. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november03/bekaert/11bekaert.htmlGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema, W3C Recommendation, February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/ [Accessed 29 June 2006]Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The China Digital Museum Project: A DSpace federation. http://wiki.dspace.org/ChinaDigitalMuseumProject [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    CrossRef.org: DOIs for Research Content. http://www.crossref.org/ [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Darlington, J.: PRONOM – A Practical Online Compendium of File Formats. RLG DigiNews, 7(5), October 2003. http://www.rlg.org/legacy/preserv/diginews/v7_n5_feature2.htmlGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van de Sompel, H.: Roadblocks, June 2003. http://www.sis.pitt. edu/∼dlwkshop/paper_sompel.html [Accessed 27 June 2006]Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van de Sompel, H., Beit-Arie, O.: Open Linking in the Scholarly Information Environment Using the OpenURL Framework. D-Lib Magazine, 7(3), March 2001. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/vandesompel/03vandesompel. htmlGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vande Sompel H., Bekaert J., Liu X., Balakireva L. and Schwander T. (2005). aDORe: A Modular, Standards-Based Digital Object Repository. The Computer Journal 48(5): 514–535. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxh114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van de Sompel, H., Lagoze, C., Bekaert, J., Liu, X., Payette, S., Warner, S.: An Interoperable Fabric for Scholarly Value Chains. D-Lib Magazine, 12(10), 2006, doi:10.145/october2006-vandesompel. http://dx.doi.org/10.145/october2006-vandesompelGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van de Sompel, H., Nelson, M.L., Lagoze, C., Warner, S.: Resource Harvesting within the OAI-PMH Framework. D-Lib Magazine, 10(12), 2004. doi:10.1045/december2004-vandesompel. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december04/vandesompel/12vandesompel.htmGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van de Sompel, H., Payette, S., Erickson, J., Lagoze, C., Warner, S.: Rethinking scholarly communication: Building the system that scholars deserve. D-Lib Magazine, 10(9), 2004. doi:10.1045/september2004-vandesompel http://www.dlib. org/dlib/september04/vandesompel/09vandesompel.htmlGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DLF Aquifer - Asset action experimentation. http://rama.grainger.uiuc.edu/assetactions/index.asp [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Information and documentation - The Dublin Core metadata element set, ISO (ISO 15836) and ANSI/NISO (Z39.85-2001), 2001. http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39-85.pdf [Accessed 29 June 2006]Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    EduSource Communication Layer (ECL). http://ecl.iat. sfu.ca/#LORNET [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ellson, J.: WebDot Home Page. http://www.site.uottawa. ca:4333/webdot/ [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hitchcock, S., Bergmark, D., Brody, T., Gutteridge, C., Carr, L., Hall, W., Lagoze, C., Harnad, S.: Open citation linking: The way forward. D-Lib Magazine, 8(10), October 2002. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october02/hitchcock/10hitchcock.htmlGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hunter, J., Choudhury, S.: A Semi-Automated Digital Preservation System based on Semantic Web Services. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital libraries (JCDL2004), pp. 269–278, Tucson, Arizona, USA, June 2004. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/996350.996415Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    IDEAlliance and PRISM Working Group. PRISM: Publishing Requirements for Industry Standard Metadata, Version 1.2h, September 2003. http://www.prismstandard.org/PAM_1.0/ PRISM_1.2h.pdf [Accessed 29 June 2006]Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    IMSCP: The IMS Content Packaging Specification. http://www. imsproject. org/content/packaging/ [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Isaac Newton to Robert Hooke in a letter dated 5th February 1676. Written as “If have seen further it is by standing on ye sholders[sic] of Giants.”. Quote reproduced in Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton, Richard S. Westfall, Cambridge, 1980, p 274. Amusingly, many forms of this phrase are (mis)attributed to Newton. The phrase draws on the much older metaphor of “dwarfs standing on the shoulders of giants” and hence being able to see further by virtue of their vantage point rather than statureGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jacobs, I., Walsh, N.(eds): Architecture of the World Wide Web, Volume One, December 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/ [Accessed 29 June 2006]Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jerez, H., Manepalli, G., Blanchi, C., Lannom, L.W.: ADL-R: The First Instance of a CORDRA Registry. D-Lib Magazine, 12(2), February 2006. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february06/jerez/02jerez.htmlGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    JSR 170: Content Repository for JavaTM technology API. http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=170 [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kahn, R., Wilensky, R.: A framework for distributed digital object services. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 6(2), April 2006. doi:10.1007/s00799-005-0128-x. Original 1995 report at: http://www.cnri.reston.va.us/cstr/arch/k-w.htmlGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax, W3C Recommendation, February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/ [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kraan, W., Mason, J.: Issues in Federating Repositories: A Report on the First International CORDRA Workshop. D-Lib Magazine, 11(3), March 2005. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march05/kraan/03kraan.htmlGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lagoze, C., Van de Sompel, H., Nelson, M., Warner, S.: The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting, version 2.0, June 2002. http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/openarchivesprotocol.htm [Accessed 29 June 2006]Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Live Clipboard Technical Introduction. http://spaces.msn.com/editorial/rayozzie/demo/liveclip/liveclipsample/techPreview.html [Accessed 2006-06-25]Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nutch: Open-source web search software built on lucence and java. http://lucene.apache.org/nutch/ [Accessed 29 June 2006]Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    The Library of Congress. METS: Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard. http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, UBCIM Publications, New Series, 1998. http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdfGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System, CCSDS Secretariat, NASA, July 2002 http://ssdoo.gsfc.nasa. gov/nost/wwwclassic/documents/pdf/CCSDS-650.0-B-1.pdfGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Open Service Interface Definitions (OSIDs). http://www.okiproject.org/ [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    SRW/U Record Update service. http://srw.cheshire3. org/docs/update/ [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Atkins, D., et al.: National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure, Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyber-infrastructure, 2003. http://www.communitytechnology.org/nsf_ci_report/Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Waters, D.J.: Cyberinfrastructure and the Humanities. http://www.cni.org/tfms/2003b.fall/handouts/Fall2003Handouts/H- Watersplenary.doc [Accessed 27 June 2006]Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    WebDAV: Web-based Distributed Authoring and Versioning. http://www.graphviz.org/webdot [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    XFDU: XML Formatted Data Unit. http://sindbad.gsfc.nasa. gov/xfdu/ [Accessed 29 June 2006]Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    ANSI/NISO Z39.88 - 2004 The OpenURL Framework for Context-Sensitive Services, 2004. http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/ Z39_88_final_ANSIpending.pdf [Accessed 28 June 2006]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simeon Warner
    • 1
  • Jeroen Bekaert
    • 2
  • Carl Lagoze
    • 1
  • Xiaoming Liu
    • 3
  • Sandy Payette
    • 1
  • Herbert Van de Warner
    • 3
  1. 1.Computing and Information ScienceCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringGhent UniversityGentBelgium
  3. 3.Research LibraryLos Alamos National LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA

Personalised recommendations