Advertisement

Extremophiles

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 903–916 | Cite as

Bacterial and archaeal profiling of hypersaline microbial mats and endoevaporites, under natural conditions and methanogenic microcosm experiments

  • José Q. García-Maldonado
  • Alejandra Escobar-Zepeda
  • Luciana Raggi
  • Brad M. Bebout
  • Alejandro Sanchez-Flores
  • Alejandro López-Cortés
Original Paper

Abstract

Bacterial and archaeal community structure of five microbial communities, developing at different salinities in Baja California Sur, Mexico, were characterized by 16S rRNA sequencing. The response of the microbial community to artificial changes in salinity–sulfate concentrations and to addition of trimethylamine was also evaluated in microcosm experiments. Ordination analyses of the microbial community structure showed that microbial composition was distinctive for each hypersaline site. Members of bacteria were dominated by Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria phyla, while Halobacteria of the Euryarchaeota phylum was the most represented class of archaea for all the environmental samples. At a higher phylogenetic resolution, methanogenic communities were dominated by members of the Methanosarcinales, Methanobacteriales and Methanococcales orders. Incubation experiments showed that putative hydrogenotrophic methanogens of the Methanomicrobiales increased in abundance only under lowest salinity and sulfate concentrations. Trimethylamine addition effectively increased the abundance of methylotrophic members from the Methanosarcinales, but also increased the relative abundance of the Thermoplasmata class, suggesting the potential capability of these microorganisms to use trimethylamine in hypersaline environments. These results contribute to the knowledge of microbial diversity in hypersaline environments from Baja California Sur, Mexico, and expand upon the available information for uncultured methanogenic archaea in these ecosystems.

Keywords

Hypersaline microbial mats Microbial diversity Methanogenesis Microcosm incubations 454 pyrosequencing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by CONACYT grant 105969-Z (2008–2014) to ALC and by grants to BMB by NASA’s Exobiology program. We are grateful with Exportadora de Sal, S.A. for access to the Guerrero Negro field site. We thank to Adrian Mungia for technical assistance in the library prep and 454 pyrosequencing. We thank ‘Unidad de Secuenciación Masiva y Bioinformática’ at the ‘Laboratorio Nacional de Apoyo Tecnológico a las Ciencias Genómicas’, CONACyT #260481, Instituto de Biotecnología/UNAM for computational resources used for the bioinformatics analyses. We are thankful to Santiago Cadena Rodríguez for lab assistance and for his contributions on the interpretations of the results. We are very appreciative of many helpful discussions with Cheryl Kelley and for the field assistance of Angela M. Detweiler.

Supplementary material

792_2018_1047_MOESM1_ESM.png (232 kb)
Supplementary Figure S1. Composition of the methanogenic archaeal community in relative abundance at genus level. The environmental samples from natural hypersaline microbial mats and endovaporitic communities from Laguna San Ignacio (LSI) and Exportadora de Sal S.A. de C.V. (ESSA) in Guerrero Negro, are intercalated with the samples from the microcosms experiments with a decreased salinity–sulfate concentrations (LOW suffix) or trimethylamine additions (TMA suffix). Notably, sample ESSA-A9-LOW was completely absent from methanogenic archaea. Sample LSI-S3-TMA was discarded because of low sequencing yield. (PNG 232 kb)
792_2018_1047_MOESM2_ESM.html (435 kb)
Supplementary Material S2. Interactive abundance charts showing the relative abundance of bacteria at the genus level. A different Krona chart is displayed separately for the environmental samples from natural hypersaline microbial mats and endovaporitic communities from Laguna San Ignacio (LSI) and Exportadora de Sal S.A. de C.V. (ESSA) in Guerrero Negro, and for the samples in microcosm experiments incubated 23 days in a low salinity (LOW suffix) or trimethylamine (TMA suffix). Sample LSI-S3-TMA was discarded because of low sequencing yield. (HTML 434 kb)

References

  1. Adam PS, Borrel G, Brochier-Armanet C, Gribaldo S (2017) The growing tree of Archaea: New perspectives on their diversity, evolution and ecology. ISME J 11:2407–2425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W et al (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Antón J, Peña A, Santos F et al (2008) Distribution, abundance and diversity of the extremely halophilic bacterium Salinibacter ruber. Saline Syst 4:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bengtsson-Palme J, Hartmann M, Eriksson KM et al (2015) METAXA2: improved identification and taxonomic classification of small and large subunit rRNA in metagenomic data. Mol Ecol Resour 15:1403–1414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boone DR, Whitman WB, Koga Y (2001) Order III. Methanosarcinales ord. nov. In: Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds) Bergey´s manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 268–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borrel G, McCann A, Deane J et al (2017) Genomics and metagenomics of trimethylamine-utilizing Archaea in the human gut microbiome. ISME J 11:2059–2074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Castelle CJ, Wrighton KC, Thomas BC et al (2015) Genomic expansion of domain Archaea highlights roles for organisms from new phyla in anaerobic carbon cycling. Curr Biol 25:690–701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Ordination of samples by multi-dimensional scaling (MDS). In: Clarke KR and Warwick RM (eds) Change in marine communities: An approach to the statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Plymouth, UK, pp 45–57Google Scholar
  9. Des Marais DJ (1990) Microbial mats and the early evolution of life. Trends Ecol Evol 5:140–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Engelbrektson A, Kunin V, Wrighton KC et al (2010) Experimental factors affecting PCR-based estimates of microbial species richness and evenness. ISME J 4:642–647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans PN, Parks DH, Chadwick GL et al (2015) Methane metabolism in the archaeal phylum Bathyarchaeota revealed by genome-centric metagenomics. Science 350:434–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernández-Gómez B, Richter M, Schüler M et al (2013) Ecology of marine Bacteroidetes: a comparative genomics approach. ISME J 7:1026–1037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. García-Maldonado JQ, Bebout BM, Celis LB, López-Cortés A (2012) Phylogenetic diversity of methyl-coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) gene and methanogenesis from trimethylamine in hypersaline environments. Int Microbiol 15:33–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. García-Maldonado JQ, Bebout BM, Everroad RC, López-Cortés A (2015) Evidence of novel phylogenetic lineages of methanogenic Archaea from hypersaline microbial mats. Microb Ecol 69:106–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Han R, Zhang X, Liu J, Long Q, Chen L, Lui D, Zhu D (2017) Microbial community structure and diversity within hypersaline Keke Salt Lake environments. Can J Microbiol 63:895–908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris JK, Caporaso JG, Walker JJ et al (2013) Phylogenetic stratigraphy in the Guerrero Negro hypersaline microbial mat. ISME J 7:50–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jahnke LL, Orphan VJ, Embaye T et al (2008) Lipid biomarker and phylogenetic analyses to reveal archaeal biodiversity and distribution in hypersaline microbial mat and underlying sediment. Geobiology 6:394–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelley C, Poole J, Tazaz AM et al (2012) Substrate limitation for methanogenesis in hypersaline environments. Astrobiology 12:89–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelley C, Nicholson BE, Beaudoin CS et al (2014) Trimethylamine and organic matter additions reverse substrate limitation effects on the δ13C values of methane produced in hypersaline microbial mats. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:7316–7323CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelley CA, Chanton JP, Bebout BM (2015) Rates and pathways of methanogenesis in hypersaline environments as determined by 13C-labeling. Biogeochemistry 126:329–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King GM (1988) Methanogenesis from methylated amines in a hypersaline algal mat. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:130–136PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Knoll AH (1985) The distribution and evolution of microbial life in the late Proterozoic era. Ann Rev Microbiol 39:391–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lazar CS, Parkes RJ, Cragg BA et al (2011) Methanogenic diversity and activity in hypersaline sediments of the centre of the Napoli mud volcano, Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Environ Microbiol 13:2078–2091CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ley RE, Harris JK, Wilcox J et al (2006) Unexpected diversity and complexity of the Guerrero Negro hypersaline microbial mat. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3685–3695CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Li W, Godzik A (2006) CD-HIT: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22:1658–1659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R et al (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1363–1371CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Lydvo S (2015) Investigation of the putative iron reducing capabilities of Lokiarchaeota. Dissertation, University of BergenGoogle Scholar
  29. Mcgenity TJ (2010) Methanogens and methanogenesis in hypersaline environments. In: Timmis KN (ed) Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 665–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2014) Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Najjari A, Elshahed MS, Cherif A, Youssef NH (2015) Patterns and determinants of halophilic Archaea (Class Halobacteria) diversity in tunisian endorheic salt lakes and sebkhet systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:4432–4441CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Narasingarao P, Podell S, Ugalde JA et al (2012) De novo metagenomic assembly reveals abundant novel major lineage of Archaea in hypersaline microbial communities. ISME J 6:81–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM (2011) Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web browser. BMC Bioinform 12:385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oremland RS, Polcin S (1982) Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1270–1276PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Oren A (2011) Thermodynamic limits to microbial life at high salt concentrations. Environ Microbiol 13:1908–1923CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Oren A (2013) Salinibacter: an extremely halophilic bacterium with archaeal properties. FEMS Microbiol Lett 342:1–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Orphan VJ, Jahnke LL, Embaye T et al (2008) Characterization and spatial distribution of methanogens and methanogenic biosignatures in hypersaline microbial mats of Baja California. Geobiology 6:376–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ortiz-Alvarez R, Casamayor EO (2016) High occurrence of Pacearchaeota and Woesearchaeota (Archaea superphylum DPANN) in the surface waters of oligotrophic high-altitude lakes. Environ Microbiol Rep 8:210–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Paul K, Nonoh JO, Mikulski L, Brune A (2012) “Methanoplasmatales” Thermoplasmatales-related Archaea in termite guts and other environments, are the seventh order of methanogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:8245–8253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Podell S, Ugalde JA, Narasingarao P et al (2013) Assembly-driven community genomics of a hypersaline microbial ecosystem. PLoS One 8:e61692CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Poulsen M, Schwab C, Borg Jensen B et al (2013) Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen. Nat Commun 4:1428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K et al (2007) SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35:7188–7196CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Reeburgh W (2007) Oceanic methane biogeochemistry. Chem Rev 107:486–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rinke C, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A et al (2013) Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499:431–437CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Robertson CE, Spear JR, Harris JK, Pace NR (2009) Diversity and stratification of archaea in a hypersaline microbial mat. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1801–1810CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F (2016) VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4:e2584.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2584 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Sahl JW, Pace NR, Spear JR (2008) Comparative molecular analysis of endoevaporitic microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6444–6446CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith JM, Green SJ, Kelley C et al (2008) Shifts in methanogen community structure and function associated with long-term manipulation of sulfate and salinity in a hypersaline microbial mat. Environ Microbiol 10:386–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sørensen KB, Canfield DE, Teske AP, Oren A (2005) Community composition of a hypersaline endoevaporitic microbial mat community composition of a hypersaline endoevaporitic microbial mat. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7352–7365CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Sorokin DY, Makarova KS, Abbas B et al (2017) Discovery of extremely halophilic, methyl-reducing Euryarchaea provides insights into the evolutionary origin of methanogenesis. Nat Microbiol 2:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sousa FL, Neukirchen S, Allen JF et al (2016) Lokiarchaeon is hydrogen dependent. Nat Microbiol 1:14–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spang A, Ettema TJG (2017) Archaeal evolution: the methanogenic roots of Archaea. Nat Microbiol 2:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Spang A, Saw JH, Jørgensen SL et al (2015) Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature 521:173–179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Spear JR, Ley RE, Berger AB, Pace NR (2003) Complexity in natural microbial ecosystems: the Guerrero Negro experience. Biol Bull 204:168–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Vanwonterghem I, Evans PN, Parks DH et al (2016) Methylotrophic methanogenesis discovered in the archaeal phylum Verstraetearchaeota. Nat Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.170 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Ventosa A, de la Haba RR, Sánchez-Porro C, Papke RT (2015) Microbial diversity of hypersaline environments: a metagenomic approach. Curr Opin Microbiol 25:80–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Vogt JC, Abed RMM, Albach DC, Palinska KA (2017) Bacterial and archaeal diversity in hypersaline cyanobacterial mats along a transect in the intertidal flats of the Sultanate of Oman. Microb Ecol 2:1–17Google Scholar
  59. Whitman WB, Bowen TL, Boone DR (2006) The methanogenic bacteria. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E (eds) The prokaryotes, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 165–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wong HL, Ahmed-cox A, Burns BP (2016) Molecular ecology of hypersaline microbial mats: current insights and new directions. Microorganisms 6:2–15Google Scholar
  61. Wong HL, Visscher PT, White RA III, Smith DL, Patterson MM, Burns BP (2017) Dynamics of archaea at fine spatial scales in Shark Bay mat microbiomes. Sci Rep 7:46160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Youssef NH, Rinke C, Stepanauskas R et al (2015) Insights into the metabolism, lifestyle and putative evolutionary history of the novel archaeal phylum “Diapherotrites”. ISME J 9:447–460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhuang G, Elling FJ, Nigro LM et al (2016) Multiple evidence for methylotrophic methanogenesis as the dominant methanogenic pathway in hypersaline sediments from the Orca Basin, Gulf of Mexico. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 187:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Q. García-Maldonado
    • 1
  • Alejandra Escobar-Zepeda
    • 2
  • Luciana Raggi
    • 3
  • Brad M. Bebout
    • 4
  • Alejandro Sanchez-Flores
    • 2
  • Alejandro López-Cortés
    • 5
  1. 1.CONACYT - Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad MéridaYucatánMexico
  2. 2.Unidad Universitaria de Secuenciación Masiva y Bioinformática, Instituto de BiotecnologíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexicoMexico
  3. 3.CONACYT - Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad Michoacana San Nicolás de HidalgoMoreliaMexico
  4. 4.Exobiology Branch, Ames Research CenterNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationMoffett FieldUSA
  5. 5.Laboratorio de Geomicrobiología y BiotecnologíaInstituto Politécnico Nacional 195, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, Playa Palo de Santa Rita SurLa PazMexico

Personalised recommendations