Advertisement

Effects of centric mandibular splint therapy on orofacial pain and cerebral activation patterns

  • Marius Ernst
  • A. Elisa Schenkenberger
  • Martin Domin
  • Bernd Kordass
  • Martin LotzeEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the effects on pain, movement kinematics, and cerebral representation by a 3-month mandibular splint therapy.

Material and methods

Thirteen patients with temporo-mandibular joint disease (TMD) and moderate pain intensity were investigated before (PRE), within (after 2 weeks, POST1) and after a period of 12 weeks (POST2) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of representation of occlusal movements on natural teeth and on an individually fitted mandibular splint. In addition, kinematic investigations of jaw movements, muscle electromyography and pain ratings using a pain diary (VAS-scale 0–100) were measured.

Results

Although the patient’s pain ratings decreased about 60%, kinematic and electromyographic characteristics over therapy were not significantly altered. Over therapy, we observed a decrease of fMRI activation magnitude in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) and insular cortex during occlusion. Left hemispheric anterior insula and the cerebellar fMRI activation decrease were associated with decrease in pain over time.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this pilot study, a reduction in both discriminative (primary and secondary somatosensory cortex) and affective (anterior insula) areas for pain processing suggest that altered pain anticipation is critical for the therapeutic effects of mandibular splint therapy after TMD.

Clinical relevance

A 3-month mandibular splint therapy moderately decreases pain and anticipatory anterior insular activation.

Keywords

Temporo-mandibular joint disease Functional splint therapy fMRI EMG Kinematography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank “Fundamental” for preparing the individual adjusted splints. L.M. and K.B. were supported by the “Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft” (LO 795/25-1; KO 1598/6-1).

Funding information

Fundamental prepared the individual adjusted splints. L.M. and K.B. were supported by the “Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft” (LO 795/25-1; KO 1598/6-1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    John M, Hirsch C, Reiber T, Demand T, Implications PH (2001) Häufigkeit , Bedeutung und Behandlungs- bedarf kraniomandibulärer Dysfunktionen. Z Gesundheitswiss J Public Heal 9:136–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schindler HJ, Hugger A, Kordaß B, Türp JC (2014) Splint therapy for temporomandibular disorders: basic principles Grundlagen der Schienentherapie bei Myoarthropathien des Kausystems. Z Kraniomandibuläre Funktion 6:207–230Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Macfarlane TV, Kenealy P, Kingdon HA, Mohlin BO, Pilley JR, Richmond S et al (2009) Twenty-year cohort study of health gain from orthodontic treatment: temporomandibular disorders. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop [Internet]. American Association of Orthodontists 135:692.e1–692.e8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Al-Ani Z, Gray RJ, Davies SJ, Sloan P, Glenny A-M (2005) Stabilization splint therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular myofascial pain: a systematic review. J Dent Educ 69:1242–1250Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ommerborn MA, Kollmann C, Handschel J, Depprich RA, Lang H, Raab WHM (2010) A survey on German dentists regarding the management of craniomandibular disorders. Clin Oral Investig 14:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pficer JK, Dodic S, Lazic V, Trajkovic G, Milic N, Milicic B (2017) Occlusal stabilization splint for patients with temporomandibular disorders: meta-analysis of short and long term effects. PLoS One 12:1–21Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lickteig R, Lotze M, Kordass B (2013) Successful therapy for temporomandibular pain alters anterior insula and cerebellar representations of occlusion. Cephalalgia 33:1248–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zonnenberg AJJ, Mulder J (2014) The efficacy of a specific stabilization splint. Cranio - J Craniomandib Pract 32:68–74Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linsen SS, Stark H, Klitzschmüller M (2013) Reproducibility of condyle position and influence of splint therapy on different registration techniques in asymptomatic volunteers. Cranio 31:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    He SS, Li F, Song F, Wu S, Chen JY, He N et al (2014) Spontaneous neural activity alterations in temporomandibular disorders: a cross-sectional and longitudinal resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience 278:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Otsuka T, Watanabe K, Hirano Y, Kubo K, Miyake S, Sato S et al (2009) Effects of mandibular deviation on brain activation during clenching: an fMRI preliminary study. Cranio - J Craniomandib Pract 27:88–93Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lotze M, Lucas C, Domin M, Kordass B (2012) The cerebral representation of temporomandibular joint occlusion and its alternation by occlusal splints. Hum Brain Mapp 33:2984–2993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takahashi T, Miyamoto T, Terao A, Yokoyama A (2007) Cerebral activation related to the control of mastication during changes in food hardness. Neuroscience 145:791–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede RD, Zubieta JK (2005) Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain 9:463–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schiffman EL, Ohrbach R, Truelove E et al (2010) The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. V: methods used to establish and validate revised axis I diagnostic algorithms. J Orofac Pain 24:63–78Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, Munro C, Wilson B, Grimshaw WJ et al (1997) The chronic pain grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research. Pain 71:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kropmans TJB, Dijkstra PU, Van Veen A, Stegenga B, De Bont LGM (1999) The smallest detectable difference of mandibular function impairment in patients with a painfully restricted temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res 78:1445–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Linsen SS, Stark H, Matthias A (2012) Changes in condylar position using different types of splints with and without a chinstrap: a case-control study. Cranio - J Craniomandib Pract 30:25–31Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kordass B, Hugger A, Bernhardt O (2012) Correlation between computer-assisted measurements of mandibular opening and closing movements and clinical symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction. Int J Comput Dent [Internet] 15:93–107Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brown CA, Seymour B, El-Deredy W, Jones AKP (2008) Confidence in beliefs about pain predicts expectancy effects on pain perception and anticipatory processing in right anterior insula. Pain [Internet]. International Association for the Study of Pain 139:324–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Friebel U, Eickhoff SB, Lotze M (2011) Coordinate-based meta-analysis of experimentally induced and chronic persistent neuropathic pain. Neuroimage [Internet]. Elsevier Inc. 58:1070–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dubé AA, Duquette M, Roy M, Lepore F, Duncan G, Rainville P (2009) Brain activity associated with the electrodermal reactivity to acute heat pain. Neuroimage [Internet]. Elsevier Inc. 45:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gerstner GE, Gracely RH, Deebajah A, Ichesco E, Quintero A, Clauw DJ et al (2012) Posterior insular molecular changes in myofascial pain. J Dent Res 91:485–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ichesco E, Quintero A, Clauw D, Peltier S, Sundgren PM, Gerstner GE et al (2012) Altered functional connectivity between the insula and the cingulate cortex in patients with TMD – a pilot study. Headache 52:441–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Takada T, Miyamoto T (2004) A fronto-parietal network for chewing of gum: a study on human subjects with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Lett 360:137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tamura T, Kanayama T, Yoshida S, kawasaki T (2003) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human jaw movements. J Oral Rehabil 30:614–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Onozuka M, Fujita M, Watanabe K, Hirano Y, Niwa M, Nishiyama K et al (2002) Mapping brain region activity during chewing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Dent Res [Internet] 81:743–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shinagawa H, Ono T, Honda E, Sasaki T, Taira M, Iriki A et al (2004) Chewing-side preference is involved in differential cortical activation patterns during tongue movements after bilateral gum-chewing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Dent Res 83:762–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kordass B, Lucas C, Huetzen D, Zimmermann C, Gedrange T, Langner S et al (2007) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of brain activity during chewing and occlusion by natural teeth and occlusal splints. Ann Anat 189:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu ZJ, Yamagata K, Kasahara Y, Ito G (1999) Electromyographic examination of jaw muscles in relation to symptoms and occlusion of patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. J Oral Rehabil 26:33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Manfredini D, Cocilovo F, Favero L, Ferronato G, Tonello S, Guarda-Nardini L (2011) Surface electromyography of jaw muscles and kinesiographic recordings: diagnostic accuracy for myofascial pain. J Oral Rehabil 38:791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Santana-Mora U, Cudeiro J, Mora-Bermúdez MJ, Rilo-Pousa B, Ferreira-Pinho JC, Otero-Cepeda JL et al (2009) Changes in EMG activity during clenching in chronic pain patients with unilateral temporomandibular disorders. J Electromyogr Kinesiol [Internet] Elsevier Ltd 19:e543–e549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Holmgren K, Sheikholeslam A, Riise C, Kopp S (1990) The effects of an occlusal splint on the electromyographic activities of the temporal and masseter muscles during maximal clenching in patients with a habit of nocturnal bruxism and signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 17:447–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Al-Saleh MAQ, Armijo-Olivo S, Flores-Mir C, Thie NMR (2012) Electromyography in diagnosing temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc 143:351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Macfarlane TV, Kenealy P, Kingdon HA, Mohlin BO, Pilley JR, Richmond S, Shaw WC (2009) Twenty-year cohort study of health gain from orthodontic treatment: temporomandibular disorders. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 135:692e1–692e8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Functional Imaging Unit, Center of Diagnostic Radiology and NeuroradiologyUniversity Medicine GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
  2. 2.Department of Dental Radiology, Centre of Dentistry and Oral HealthUniversity Medicine GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
  3. 3.Department of Clinical Dental CAD/CAM and CMD-Treatment, Centre of Dentistry and Oral HealthUniversity Medicine GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany

Personalised recommendations