Advertisement

Comparison of recovery in pediatric patients: a retrospective study

  • Masanori TsukamotoEmail author
  • Takashi Hitosugi
  • Takeshi Yokoyama
Short Communication
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

The recovery after general anesthesia is influenced by the choice of inhalational agent. Stimulations might make patient’s agitate. However, the recovery using no touch technique might be safer. In this study, we compared the recovery time, awakening end-tidal concentration, and respiratory complications among inhalational anesthetics in pediatric patients using no touch technique, retrospectively.

Material and methods

The subjects were pediatric patients aged 3 months to 11 years under general anesthesia using sevoflurane, isoflurane, or desflurane. Background, awakening end-tidal concentration, respiratory complications, the time of eye open, body movement, and extubation were recorded.

Results

A total of 170 patients were included in the study. There were no respiratory complications during emergence. Awakening end-tidal concentration in desflurane was 0.98%, sevoflurane (0.39%), and isoflurane (0.25%). In patients received desflurane, the time of body movement, eye open, and extubation were significantly shorter than patients who received other anesthetics (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The recovery from desflurane was significantly shorter among three inhalational anesthetics with no touch technique. In addition, no airway-related complication occurred.

Clinical relevance

The recovery from desflurane might be useful to predict emergence by end-tidal inhalational concentration.

Keywords

Anesthesia No touch technique Recovery Pediatric patients 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Katoh T, Suguro Y, Ikeda T, Kazama T, Ikeda K (1993) Influence of age on awakening concentrations of sevoflurane and isoflurane. Anesth Analg 76(2):348–352Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin TC, Lu CC, Hsu CH, Wu GJ, Lee MS, Ho ST (2013) Duration effect of desflurane anesthesia and its awakening time and arterial concentration in gynecologic patients. Clinics 68(10):1305–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lin TC, Lu CC, Hsu CH, Pergolizz JV Jr, Chang CC, Lee MS, Ho ST (2016) Awakening arterial blood and end-tidal concentrations of isoflurane in female surgical patients. Medicine 95(30):e4370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim MK, Baek CW, Kang H, Choi GJ, Park YH, Yang SY, Shin HY, Jung YH, Woo YC (2016) Comparison of emergence after deep extubation using desflurane or desflurane with remifentanil in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a randomized trial. J Clin Anesth 28:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nordmann GR, Read JA, Sale SM, Stoddart PA, Wolf AR (2006) Emergence and recovery in children after desflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia: effect of anaesthetic duration. Br J Anaesth 96(6):779–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Welborn LG, Hannallah RS, Norden JM, Ruttimann UE, Callan CM (1996) Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg 83(5):917–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee JY, Lim BG, Park HY, Kim NS (2012) Sufentanil infusion before extubation suppresses coughing on emergence without delaying extubation time and reduces postoperative analgesic requirement without increasing nausea and vomiting after desflurane anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol 62(6):512–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsukamoto M, Yamanaka H, Yokoyama T (2018) Age-related differences in recovery from inhalational anesthesia: a retrospective study. Aging Clin Exp Res 30(12):1523–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sheta SA, Abdelhalim AA, Nada E (2011) Evaluation of “no touch” extubation technique on airway-related complications during emergence from general anesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth 5(2):125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsui BC, Wagner A, Cave D, Elliott C, El-Hakim H, Malherbe S (2004) The incidence of laryngospasm with a “no touch” extubation technique after tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Anesth Analg 98(2):327–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sale SM, Read JA, Stoddart PA, Wolf AR (2006) Prospective comparison of sevoflurane and desflurane in formerly premature infants undergoing inguinal herniotomy. Br J Anaesth 96(6):774–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mori N, Nagata H, Ohta S, Suzuki M (1996) Prolonged sevoflurane inhalation was not nephrotoxic in two patients with refractory status asthmaticus. Anesth Analg 83(1):189–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brioni JD, Varughese S, Ahmed R, Bein B (2017) A clinical review of inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane: from early research to emerging topics. J Anesth 31(5):764–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sakai EM, Connolly LA, Klauck JA (2005) Inhalation anesthesiology and volatile liquid anesthetics: focus on isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane. Pharmacotherapy 25(12):1773–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shan J, Sun L, Wang D, Li X (2015) Comparison of the neuroprotective effects and recovery profiles of isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane as neurosurgical pre-conditioning on ischemia/reperfusion cerebral injury. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 8(2):2001–2009Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R, Sakima N, Parker SD, Fleisher LA (2004) Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 98(3):632–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Saudan S, Petak F, Hantos Z, Habre W (2008) Desflurane but not sevoflurane impairs airway and respiratory tissue mechanics in children with susceptible airways. Anesthesiology 108(2):216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masanori Tsukamoto
    • 1
    Email author
  • Takashi Hitosugi
    • 2
  • Takeshi Yokoyama
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Dental AnesthesiologyKyushu University HospitalFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Faculty of Dental ScienceKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations