Comparison of recovery in pediatric patients: a retrospective study
- 22 Downloads
The recovery after general anesthesia is influenced by the choice of inhalational agent. Stimulations might make patient’s agitate. However, the recovery using no touch technique might be safer. In this study, we compared the recovery time, awakening end-tidal concentration, and respiratory complications among inhalational anesthetics in pediatric patients using no touch technique, retrospectively.
Material and methods
The subjects were pediatric patients aged 3 months to 11 years under general anesthesia using sevoflurane, isoflurane, or desflurane. Background, awakening end-tidal concentration, respiratory complications, the time of eye open, body movement, and extubation were recorded.
A total of 170 patients were included in the study. There were no respiratory complications during emergence. Awakening end-tidal concentration in desflurane was 0.98%, sevoflurane (0.39%), and isoflurane (0.25%). In patients received desflurane, the time of body movement, eye open, and extubation were significantly shorter than patients who received other anesthetics (p < 0.05).
The recovery from desflurane was significantly shorter among three inhalational anesthetics with no touch technique. In addition, no airway-related complication occurred.
The recovery from desflurane might be useful to predict emergence by end-tidal inhalational concentration.
KeywordsAnesthesia No touch technique Recovery Pediatric patients
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 1.Katoh T, Suguro Y, Ikeda T, Kazama T, Ikeda K (1993) Influence of age on awakening concentrations of sevoflurane and isoflurane. Anesth Analg 76(2):348–352Google Scholar
- 7.Lee JY, Lim BG, Park HY, Kim NS (2012) Sufentanil infusion before extubation suppresses coughing on emergence without delaying extubation time and reduces postoperative analgesic requirement without increasing nausea and vomiting after desflurane anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol 62(6):512–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Shan J, Sun L, Wang D, Li X (2015) Comparison of the neuroprotective effects and recovery profiles of isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane as neurosurgical pre-conditioning on ischemia/reperfusion cerebral injury. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 8(2):2001–2009Google Scholar