Comparison of an indirect impression scanning system and two direct intraoral scanning systems in vivo
- 38 Downloads
This in vivo study aimed to compare the marginal discrepancies of zirconia copings manufactured on the basis of two direct intraoral scanning systems and the indirect digitization of a conventional impression.
Materials and methods
A total of 63 teeth in 23 patients were prepared to receive full-coverage crowns. Subsequently, these teeth were intraorally scanned using CEREC AC Omnicam and Cara TRIOS and a conventional impression was taken with the scannable PVS Flexitime Fast & Scan. The conventional impression was then extraorally digitized using a D700 laboratory scanner. The zirconia copings were manufactured on the basis of the resulting datasets. Silicone replicas of the copings were produced and sectioned for the measurement of the marginal discrepancy under a digital microscope.
The statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the two intraoral scanners, the CEREC AC Omnicam (86.09 μm ± 61.46 μm) and the Cara TRIOS (88.95 μm ± 54.46 μm). However, the discrepancies of the zirconia copings obtained from the laboratory scans of conventional impressions (143.29 μm ± 100.71 μm) showed significant differences. Both intraoral scanners achieved a marginal discrepancy below 100 μm, whereas the laboratory scan exhibited considerably higher values.
The intraoral scanners tested allow for the production of single-tooth-restorations with an adequate marginal fit, whereas the production of restorations on the basis of the scan of a conventional impression led to vast marginal gaps.
The method of digitizing a conventional impression using a laboratory scanner seemed to have reached its limits in the clinical environment.
KeywordsImpression scan Intraoral scanner Digital impression Marginal discrepancy
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Johannes Herrmann of Giessen, Germany, for his statistical advice.
The work was supported by the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standard.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 9.Dreyer Jorgensen K (1956) Prüfergebnisse zahnärztlicher Gußverfahren. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 13:461–468Google Scholar
- 12.Petrie CS, Walker MP, O'Mahony AM, Spencer P (2003) Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions. J Prosthet Dent 90:365–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022391303005158 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB (2008) Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 29 494(496):498–505Google Scholar
- 15.Ahrberg D, Lauer HC, Ahrberg M, Weigl P (2015) Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 20:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1504-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH (2013) Evaluation of the marginal and internal gap of metal-ceramic crown fabricated with a selective laser sintering technology: two- and three-dimensional replica techniques. J Adv Prosthodont 5:179–186. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.179 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Kühmstedt P and Hintersehr J (2008) Optische 3D-Messtechnik im Dentalbereich digital_dental news 9:40–45Google Scholar
- 36.Hollenbeck K, Attin T and Van der Poel M (2012) Dental lab 3D scanners - how they work and what works best. 3Shape technology research, Copenhagen. http://www.3shapedental.com/restoration/education-video/cases/white-papers/dental-lab-3d-scanners/. Accessed Acces date 2015