Retentive characteristics of individual and prefabricated polyvinylsiloxane overdenture attachments: alternative treatment options for geriatric patients
- 153 Downloads
Stud attachments are often too adhesive and too susceptible to damage for use in geriatric patients, especially when implants are angulated. This study aimed to evaluate alternative anchoring systems comprising individual and prefabricated polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) attachments.
Materials and methods
A total of 182 specimens with individual PVS (IPVS) attachments (Shore hardness [SH] 25, SH50, SH65], prefabricated PVS (PPVS) attachments (SM green, yellow, and red), and Locator attachments (LR blue) were fabricated (n = 7 per group). Retention force was measured using the following parameters: insertion/removal (100, 200, 500, 1000, and 5000 cycles), thermal undulation (10,000 cycles at 5–55 °C; one implant per specimen), implant angulation (0°, 5°, and 10° convergence and divergence; two implants per specimen), and artificial saliva.
Insertion/removal and thermal undulation caused no changes in retention force in SM green and IPVS subgroups; conversely, LR blue, SM red, and SM yellow attachments exhibited significant decreases in retention force of up to 66% (all P ≤ 0.001). Implant angulation produced relevant changes in retention force only in LR blue attachments. Artificial saliva caused a general decrease in retention force.
Retention force of low-retentive PVS attachments proved to be comparatively immune to dislocation and thermal undulation, as well as to implant angulation up to 10°.
Low-retentive PVS attachments could be a treatment option if reduced denture retention is required and/or if angulated implants are in place. Clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the materials’ durability under oral conditions.
KeywordsPolyvinylsiloxane Implants Attachments Overdenture Geriatric dentistry
The authors thank Bredent Medical, Senden, Germany, for supporting this study by providing materials.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, formal consent was not required.
- 5.Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, Swain MV (2009) Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features. Int J Prosthodont 22:429–440Google Scholar
- 7.Kronstrom M, Carlsson GE (2017) An international survey among Prosthodontists of the use of mandibular implant-supported dental prostheses. J Prosthodont. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12603
- 12.Petropoulos VC, Smith W, Kousvelari E (1997) Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:176–185Google Scholar
- 13.Rutkanas V, Mizutani H (2004) Retentive and stabilizing properties of stud and magnetic attachments retaining manibular overdenture. Stomatol 6:85–90Google Scholar
- 14.Chung KH, Whiting D, Kronstrom M, Chan D, Wataha J (2011) Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading. Int J Prosthodont 24:127–129Google Scholar
- 16.Wolf K, Ludwig K, Hartfil H, Kern M (2009) Analysis of retention and wear of ball attachments. Quintessence Int 40:405–412Google Scholar
- 18.Engelhardt F, Zeman F, Behr M, Hahmel S (2016) Prosthetic complications and maintenance requirements in locator-attached implant-supported overdentures: a retrospective study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 24:31–35Google Scholar
- 19.Gent AM (1958) On the relation between indentation hardness and Young’s modulus. IRI Trans 34:46–57Google Scholar
- 29.Setz JM, Wright PS, Ferman AM (2000) Effects of attachment type on the mobility of implant-stabilized overdentures—an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 13:494–499Google Scholar
- 32.Taylor RL, Bulad K, Verran J, McCord JF (2008) Colonization and deterioration of soft denture lining materials in vivo. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 16(2):50–55Google Scholar