Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 22, Issue 7, pp 2487–2493 | Cite as

Treatment of symptomatic benign migratory glossitis: a systematic review

  • Wladimir Gushiken de Campos
  • Camila Vieira Esteves
  • Lígia Gonzaga Fernandes
  • Carina Domaneschi
  • Celso Augusto Lemos Júnior
Review

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the results of all published studies on symptomatic benign migratory glossitis and evaluate the best available treatment.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published up to September 2017, with no time restriction. We considered only articles published in English that evaluated the treatment of symptomatic benign migratory glossitis in children and adults. The protocol for this systematic review was registered at the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) as CRD42017074096.

Results

Of the 840 identified studies, 11 were included in our sample. Multiple treatment modalities were described for the treatment of symptomatic benign migratory glossitis.

Conclusions

There is a very low level of evidence for the treatment of symptomatic benign migratory glossitis, with substantial methodological heterogeneity among the evaluated studies. In summary, we could identify no specific treatment for symptomatic benign migratory glossitis.

Clinical relevance

In clinical practice, at the outpatient clinic of oral medicine, we attend to many patients diagnosed with benign migratory glossitis, with varying intensity of pain ranging from mild to severe. Treating this disease is a formidable challenge for clinicians. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of benign migratory glossitis to identify the best evidence-based treatment available for this condition. We believe that this article may be useful in guiding clinicians on the choice of treatment.

Keywords

Benign migratory glossitis Geographic tongue Treatment Exfoliatio areata linguae 

Notes

Funding

The work was supported by the Department of Stomatology, College of Dentistry, University of São Paulo in São Paulo, Brazil.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Supplementary material

784_2018_2553_MOESM1_ESM.doc (62 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 62.5 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Sigal MJ, Mock D. (1992) Symptomatic benign migratory glossitis: report of two cases and literature review. Pediatr Dent [Internet].14(6):392–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1303549
  2. 2.
    Redman RS. (1964 )Nutritional deficiencies and geographic tongue. J Chronic Dis [Internet] ;17(7):627–30. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021968164900864
  3. 3.
    Purani JM, Purani HJ. Treatment of geographic tongue with topical tacrolimus. BMJ Case Rep. 2014 Aug;2014:bcr-2013-201268Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jainkittivong A, Langlais RP (2005) Geographic tongue: characteristics of 188 cases. J Contemp Dent Pract 6(1):123–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ishibashi M, Tojo G, Watanabe M, Tamabuchi T, Masu T, Aiba S (2010) Geographic tongue treated with topical tacrolimus. J Dermatol Case Rep 4(4):57–59PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Najafi S, Gholizadeh N, Akhavan Rezayat E, Kharrazifard MJ (2016) Treatment of symptomatic geographic tongue with triamcinolone acetonide alone and in combination with retinoic acid: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent (Tehran) 13(1):23–28Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abe M, Sogabe Y, Syuto T, Ishibuchi H, Yokoyama Y, Ishikawa O (2007) Successful treatment with cyclosporin administration for persistent benign migratory glossitis. J Dermatol 34(5):340–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Assimakopoulos D, Patrikakos G, Fotika C, Elisaf M (2002) Benign migratory glossitis or geographic tongue: an enigmatic oral lesion. Am J Med 113(9):751–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bánóczy J, Szabó L, Csiba Á.(1975) Migratory glossitis: a clinical-histologic review of seventy cases. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol [Internet] 39(1–2):118–9. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030422075904016
  10. 10.
    Zegarelli E V, Kutscher AH, Silvers HF, Beube FE, Stern IB, Berman CL, et al. (1960) Triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of acute and chronic lesions of the oral mucous membranes: preliminary report. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol [Internet]. Feb;13(2):170–5. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030422060904266
  11. 11.
    Goswami M, Verma A, Verma M (2012) Benign migratory glossitis with fissured tongue. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 30(2):173–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar T, Arora N, Kataria A, Sharma D.(2016) Ozone as healing touch in a case of benign migratory glossitis. SRM J Res Dent Sci [Internet].7(1):48. Available from: http://www.srmjrds.in/text.asp?2016/7/1/48/176475
  13. 13.
    Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, DeBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schünemann HJ (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):383–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tajmirriahi A.(2014) The prevalence of geographic tongue and the effect of oral zinc sulphate (case report: Tehran, Iran). Adv Environ Biol [Internet] 8(10):571–3. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84904437245&partnerID=40&md5=4ee40624f63a27650614f20f8baa32d6
  15. 15.
    Institute JB.(2014) Reviewers’ ManualGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Redman RS (1970) Prevalence of geographic tongue, fissured tongue, median rhomboid glossitis, and hairy tongue among 3,611 Minnesota schoolchildren. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol 30(3):390–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Darwazeh AMG, Almelaih AA (2011) Tongue lesions in a Jordanian population. Prevalence, symptoms, subject’s knowledge and treatment provided. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 16(6):745–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miloǧlu O, Göregen M, Akgül HM, Acemoǧlu H (2009) The prevalence and risk factors associated with benign migratory glossitis lesions in 7619 Turkish dental outpatients. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology 107(2):29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Espelid M, Bang G, Johannessen AC, Leira JI, Christensen O (1991) Geographic stomatitis: report of 6 cases. J oral Pathol Med Off Publ Int Assoc Oral Pathol Am Acad Oral Pathol 20(9):425–428Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hietanen J, Salo OP, Kanerva L, Juvakoski T (1984) Study of the oral mucosa in 200 consecutive patients with psoriasis. Scand J Dent Res 92(1):50–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raghoebar GM, de Bont LG, Schoots CJ (1988) Erythema migrans of the oral mucosa. Report of two cases. Quintessence Int 19(11):809–811PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Stomatology, School of DentistryUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations